ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of energy. Signal as much as obtain our largest tales as quickly as they’re revealed.
Officers in a big North Texas county determined this week to chop greater than 100 Election Day polling websites and cut back the variety of early voting places, amid rising concern about GOP efforts to restrict voting entry forward of subsequent 12 months’s midterm elections.
The three-2 vote on Tuesday by commissioners in Tarrant County, which incorporates Fort Price, got here someday after President Donald Trump vowed to finish the usage of mail-in ballots. The president lacks the unilateral energy to determine how particular person states run elections, however his declaration speaks to long-brewing and unfounded claims by some conservatives that the nation’s electoral system is insecure and susceptible to widespread fraud. Trump has repeatedly and falsely asserted that he received the 2020 presidential election as a substitute of Joe Biden.
Tarrant County Decide Tim O’Hare, who heads up the commissioners court docket, has additionally raised quite a few questions in regards to the safety of native elections, serving to to launch an electoral integrity unit within the county after he turned decide in 2022. As of final summer season, nonetheless, the unit had acquired fewer than 100 allegations of voter fraud. He and fellow Republican commissioners additionally reduce funding to supply free bus rides to the polls for low-income residents. “I don’t consider it’s the county authorities’s duty to attempt to get extra folks out to the polls,” O’Hare mentioned on the time. And commissioners prohibited outdoors organizations from registering voters inside county buildings after Tarrant County GOP leaders raised issues about what they mentioned had been left-leaning teams holding registration drives. (ProPublica and The Texas Tribune have beforehand written about O’Hare’s political affect in North Texas.)
On Tuesday, O’Hare voted with the 2 Republican commissioners on the court docket to cut back the variety of polling websites within the county to 216, down from 331 in 2023. The choice additionally reduce down the variety of early voting websites.
County officers mentioned the transfer was to economize, as they traditionally see low voter turnout in nonpresidential elections.
All through the assembly, O’Hare repeatedly emphasised that the cuts had been meant to make the election extra environment friendly. He argued that each the swap to county-wide voting in 2019, which permits voters to solid a poll at any polling web site within the county, and the anticipated low turnout made the cuts applicable.
“I might enterprise to guess 99% of the general public can’t title a single factor on (the 2025 poll),” he mentioned in the course of the assembly.
Fewer voting websites means fewer voters, Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor on the College of Houston, instructed the Report.
“Should you transfer a polling place farther away from somebody’s home, then they’re much less more likely to vote since you’ve elevated the price of voting,” mentioned Rottinghaus, who has studied ballot placement and its affect on turnout. “The price will be your time. It may be your fuel.”
The county’s transfer falls in keeping with a nationwide development that typically sees Republican-led states and localities “restrain and prohibit” how voting operates — usually within the title of discouraging unlawful voting or, in Tarrant County’s latest case, reducing prices, Rottinghaus mentioned. This might appear like decreasing voting places or shortening early voting hours, he mentioned.
Texas has led a number of efforts to make going to the polls harder, he mentioned, comparable to making mail-in ballots more durable to acquire and requiring photograph IDs when casting a poll.
No single legislation dramatically impacts voter turnout, Rottinghaus mentioned, reasonably, it’s the collective of ever-changing insurance policies that may discourage folks from voting.
“The extra you progress round how voting happens, just like the hours and the places, the more durable it’s for voters to know precisely what they’re speculated to do and when,” he mentioned. “A confused voter is often a nonvoter.”
This isn’t the primary time Tarrant County has been on the forefront of fixing political headwinds. Earlier this summer season, the commissioners, led by O’Hare, voted alongside get together strains to redraw the county precincts; such modifications often occur after the decennial census reasonably than in the course of the last decade. O’Hare admitted the purpose of the redrawn maps was to favor Republican candidates.
“That is about Republican versus Democrat, interval,” O’Hare instructed Dallas tv station WFAA forward of the commissioners’ June 3 vote. “If it passes with one of many maps that I might wish to see go, it’s a really robust chance that we’ll have three Republicans on the Commissioners Court docket.”
In July, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott added redistricting to the agenda of a particular legislative session — a step he was apparently reluctant to take till he acquired a name from Trump to debate the problem, the Tribune reported. The proposal has sparked a nationwide combat over the redrawing of congressional maps. On Wednesday, the GOP-led Texas Home took an preliminary vote adopting a brand new map designed to extend the variety of Republican seats within the U.S. Congress.
Abbott has additionally fanned issues about allegations of unlawful voting, final 12 months saying the removing of greater than 1 million ineligible voters from the state’s rolls, together with greater than 6,500 potential noncitizens. An investigation by ProPublica, the Tribune and Votebeat, nonetheless, discovered that the variety of alleged noncitizens the governor cited was probably inflated and, in some circumstances, unsuitable.
Considerations In regards to the Cuts
Greater than three dozen audio system at Tuesday’s assembly denounced the transfer to chop polling websites and early voting places, with some elevating issues that it amounted to the suppression of Black, Hispanic and college-age voters. A number of audio system referred to as the cuts a extra excessive model of O’Hare’s failed effort to take away eight early voting places at faculties final 12 months. Just one individual spoke in favor of the reductions.
Sabrina Ball, who opposed decreasing the polling websites, mentioned she has labored as an election decide in Republican Commissioner Manny Ramirez’s district in northwest Tarrant County. She mentioned she’s seen firsthand folks working exhausting to search out the time to get to a polling location and vote.
“You’re not saving cash. You’re sacrificing democracy to avoid wasting a buck,” she mentioned.
The 2 Democratic commissioners, Roderick Miles Jr. and Alisa Simmons, voted in opposition to the modifications after unsuccessfully making an attempt to delay the choice.
“All people deserves the correct to have a spot that they’re comfy with and aware of to go and to solid their vote,” mentioned Miles, who represents predominantly Black neighborhoods that noticed a discount in voting places. He later added, “To dismantle or take these rights away from us that we labored exhausting to get is unacceptable at any degree.”
Simmons mentioned it was inappropriate to cut back voting places as Tarrant County’s inhabitants grows. She identified that the Republican members of the Commissioners Court docket used that progress as a cause to redistrict the county’s precincts midcycle this 12 months — a change that might considerably enhance the possibilities of a GOP candidate defeating her in 2026.
A Texas legislation handed in Might reduces the county’s minimal Election Day voting places to 212 — rolling again a 2023 requirement of 347.
Credit score:
Drew Shaw/Fort Price Report
Tarrant County Election Administrator Clinton Ludwig mentioned the websites meet the state’s new “naked minimal,” with “just a little little bit of wiggle room” in case sure deliberate places fall by means of. He instructed commissioners that the initially proposed cuts aimed to avoid wasting about $1 million.
He mentioned he based mostly the reductions on voter turnout in 2023, which noticed about 12.5% registered voters solid ballots, he mentioned. Areas’ accessibility and skill to securely retailer voting info had been additionally thought of, Ludwig mentioned.
He mentioned that no commissioner had any affect on the record and that no partisan evaluation was taken into consideration.
Ludwig and O’Hare’s workplace didn’t instantly reply to requests to remark following the vote. O’Hare has additionally not responded to ProPublica and the Tribune’s earlier reporting about him, declining a number of interview requests and refusing to reply questions, although a spokesperson despatched the newsrooms a record of eight of his main accomplishments, together with reducing county spending and reducing native property tax charges.
Rottinghaus mentioned some counties “yo-yo” 12 months to 12 months within the variety of polling locations they’ve. Elections comparable to November’s sometimes have fewer places than presidential and midterm ones, he mentioned. Nonetheless, Tarrant County’s discount appears “aggressive,” he mentioned.
As soon as the variety of polling locations goes down, it often stays down, Rottinghaus mentioned.
“You’re going to typically see that very same quantity proceed for a minimum of the close to time period,” he mentioned.
Although he finally voted to cut back polling places, Ramirez pushed again on the preliminary record of cuts to early voting websites, a few of which he mentioned had been established and fashionable with voters. Ramirez mentioned the county should steadiness entry and effectivity. Commissioners then added again 9 early voting places. O’Hare was the lone vote in opposition to that transfer, saying a few of these websites had traditionally low turnout.
“The method for the place you place these voting websites must be scientific,” Ramirez instructed the Report forward of the vote. “It ought to be population-based and proximity to extra site-based.”
A number of Fort Price Metropolis Council members urged their constituents to talk in opposition to the hassle within the lead-up to the vote.
Council member Carlos Flores, who represents components of northwest Fort Price, issued a press release in opposition to the vote, saying fewer websites negatively affect numerous communities. In a press release to the Report, he added that restricted polling places and inconvenient voting procedures contribute to low turnout.
Mia Corridor, who represents southwest Fort Price, despatched a information launch to her district on Monday, decrying the proposed cuts in components of her district which are predominantly Black or Hispanic.
“These communities have lengthy fought for equitable entry to the poll field, and eradicating their polling places is solely unacceptable,” Corridor wrote. “Whereas I perceive the pressures of state rules and budgetary constraints, disenfranchising total communities isn’t a suitable response.”
Drew Shaw is a authorities accountability reporter for the Fort Price Report. Contact him at [email protected].
