Democrats on the Home Judiciary Committee are launching a assessment Friday of the ouster of federal prosecutor Erik Siebert, per week after he resigned as U.S. legal professional for the Japanese District of Virginia, and a day after Siebert’s alternative signed an indictment of former FBI Director James Comey. Prosecutors had expressed concern about Siebert’s attainable ouster over his failure to convey a case in opposition to one other Trump adversary, New York Legal professional Common Letitia James.
President Trump, in a social media publish after Siebert’s departure from the workplace, had pressed U.S. Legal professional Common Pam Bondi about prosecutions in opposition to political foes together with Comey, James and Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California, calling them “responsible as hell.”
Mr. Trump praised one in all his personal former protection legal professionals, Lindsey Halligan, calling her “a very good lawyer,” and informed Bondi within the publish, “We won’t delay any longer.”
Halligan was sworn in as interim U.S. legal professional for the Japanese District of Virginia on Monday, changing Siebert within the workplace. She has no prior expertise as a prosecutor.
Al Drago / Bloomberg/Getty
Three days after Halligan took over the important thing prosecutorial position, Comey was indicted on two counts — one rely of creating false statements and one rely of obstruction of justice, associated to Senate testimony he gave nearly 5 years in the past. The indictment bears Halligan’s signature alone. Comey denies wrongdoing.
In a letter despatched Friday to Bondi, Home Judiciary Committee Democrats requested copies of Siebert’s efficiency evaluations, they usually’re looking for data that may present any backchannel communication between the White Home and Justice Division officers over the Comey matter.
The letter from the panel’s Democrats requests “all communications between any official or worker on the Justice Division and any official or worker on the White Home, together with President Trump, concerning prosecution referrals to the Justice Division involving present or former public officers, together with however not restricted to Letitia James, James Comey, Senator Adam Schiff, and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook dinner, from January 20, 2025, to the current.”
Earlier than she turned an interim U.S. legal professional, Halligan was a Trump White Home aide who was additionally his protection lawyer.
Committee Democrats are additionally requesting data about Halligan. Their letter to the Justice Division asks for “All paperwork concerning the choice and appointment of Lindsey Halligan as U.S. Legal professional for the Japanese District of Virginia, together with her software supplies, any vetting paperwork, any communications about her {qualifications}, and any guarantees or commitments she could have made to the White Home or the Justice Division concerning prosecuting any particular people.”
As a result of they’re within the minority and lack congressional subpoena authority, Democrats’ requests for paperwork aren’t prone to be granted by the Trump administration. However their letter presents them with the chance to register their dismay with the administration’s actions.
Within the letter to Bondi, Home Judiciary Committee rating member Jamie Raskin wrote, “President Trump — with you as a keen accomplice — is obliterating centuries of prosecutorial independence and steering the Justice Division into harmful new territory.”
Mr. Trump had expressed his displeasure with Siebert, saying Friday: “I would like him out.”
The president criticized Siebert as a result of he had the assist of each of Virginia’s Democratic senators, Tim Kaine and Mark Warner.
A U.S. legal professional nominee requires the backing of the 2 senators who symbolize the state to advance by the Senate Judiciary Committee. It appears unlikely Kaine and Warner would assist Halligan. Each senators informed the Washington Put up they’d assessment her nomination, however Kaine stated that neither of them has backed a U.S. legal professional nominee who lacks prosecutorial or Justice Division expertise.
