How Jorge Ruiz’s Deadly Automobile Crash Case Examined Alabama’s Justice System — ProPublica

When 19-year-old Jorge Ruiz walked into the Autauga County Jail in handcuffs on Oct. 28, 2018, he wasn’t a typical suspect. He was misplaced and in massive hassle in a deeply conservative a part of Alabama.

That morning, he’d been driving about 70 miles per hour in a 55 zone when he crossed the middle line of a two-lane rural freeway. His Ford pickup collided head-on with a Honda Civic, killing the girl behind the wheel. Paramedics took Ruiz to the hospital, the place a blood check discovered a hint quantity of alcohol. At simply 0.016, it was beneath the authorized threshold for intoxication.

However relatively than charging him with manslaughter, which generally could be probably the most excessive cost introduced underneath the circumstances, police went additional. They arrested him for homicide.

To assist such a homicide cost, prosecutors are supposed to indicate {that a} defendant’s conduct shows “excessive indifference” — habits so reckless that somebody is prone to die, as when an individual fires a gun right into a crowd or steers a ship into a bunch of swimmers. Suspects charged with homicide after automotive crashes typically are documented to have blood alcohol ranges greater than twice the authorized restrict and 10 instances the extent present in Ruiz’s blood, in keeping with a assessment of Alabama circumstances from the final 20 years by ProPublica. Many others had prior DUIs or had been driving 100 miles per hour or extra. On this case, the suspect had a clear felony historical past and wasn’t even going quick sufficient to be ticketed for aggravated rushing.

Ruiz’s trial lawyer mentioned that as quickly as he began speaking to the district lawyer’s workplace, the case felt totally different. Throughout the three counties in Alabama’s nineteenth Circuit Court docket, solely a handful of individuals have been charged with homicide for a automotive accident within the span of a decade — and most wound up taking a plea deal for a lesser cost.

However this time round, the prosecutor’s supply may hardly be thought of a deal in any respect: {The teenager} must plead responsible to homicide, and it will be blind plea, which means he must hope for mercy from the court docket in his sentencing. “In my 30 years of practising regulation, I’ve by no means been supplied a deal like that,” Ruiz’s court-appointed lawyer, Richard Vigorous, mentioned.

The lead prosecutor finally budged, however solely a bit of. He wouldn’t scale back the cost, however he would suggest that {the teenager} spend 30 years in jail.

That’s longer than some other sentence handed down since at the very least 2004 for a automotive crash fatality in Alabama’s nineteenth Circuit Court docket, which incorporates Autauga, Chilton and Elmore counties. A person who fled the scene of a deadly crash — and had a 0.09 blood alcohol stage 9 hours later — acquired a 15-year sentence in 2017. A girl who had thrice the authorized restrict of alcohol in her system acquired 23 years in 2007 after she killed a College of Alabama scholar.

For defendants who had been youngsters after they precipitated deadly automotive accidents, the courts might be much more lenient. In 2012, a Madison County decide granted youthful offender standing to a person who was 19 when he was charged with homicide for a drunk driving crash that killed a highschool sophomore in Huntsville. The driving force, who had a blood alcohol stage of 0.15, was sentenced to a yr in jail and two on probation.

Vigorous had a tough time squaring his shopper’s fees with the outcomes of his blood check and recorded pace. Alabama’s homicide statute doesn’t require a driver to be legally intoxicated, and other people have confronted homicide fees for killing somebody by racing or fleeing police. However neither utilized right here. Vigorous reasoned that for homicide to suit, {the teenager} would have needed to be deliberately driving into oncoming visitors.

He thought his shopper may beat the cost and instructed him to not plead responsible. Years later, attorneys concerned within the case would try and make clear what was so totally different about it — and on one truth particularly that they believed eclipsed all of the others.

He was a Mexican immigrant.

---

The case in opposition to Ruiz was, as one authorized professional put it, “an ideal storm of horrible info.”

The night time earlier than the accident, he stayed up late after ingesting at a music competition in Birmingham. On the scene of the crash, police discovered beer cans in his truck. He was within the nation on a short lived work visa and didn’t have a driver’s license. He spoke little English, counting on his 17-year-old cousin to translate his Miranda rights and the string of questions from police.

The one cause Ruiz was in Autauga County was to go to his prolonged household after ending a monthslong job in Georgia and South Carolina clearing brush from energy traces. He was days away from returning to Mexico.

The lady he killed was named Marlena Hayes. She was a 29-year-old nurse who’d simply completed the night time shift at Prattville Baptist Hospital. She wasn’t even purported to be working at the moment. She’d deliberate to see her brother carry out that weekend with the marching band on the College of West Alabama. Ultimately, although, she took the shift as a favor to a colleague.

Newspapers and TV stations in central Alabama rapidly picked up the story. Some referred to Ruiz as an unlawful immigrant regardless that he’d been within the U.S. on a six-month H-2B visa, that are permitted when employers can’t discover sufficient American staff. One in every of these articles appeared within the Montgomery Advertiser, the biggest newspaper within the space.

When Vigorous was assigned to the case, he felt compelled to indicate that his shopper had been within the U.S. legally. Ruiz’s visa had solely lapsed when he was in jail. Vigorous tracked down the Montgomery Advertiser reporter on the Autauga County courthouse to indicate him that Ruiz’s visa had been legitimate when he was arrested. However even after that, the newspaper didn’t acknowledge that he was within the nation legally on the time of the crash. “The Montgomery Advertiser stands behind our reporting,” the newspaper mentioned in a press release launched by means of its guardian firm, Gannett.

Within the years main as much as Ruiz’s arrest, Alabama had established itself as a very unwelcoming place for foreigners. In 2011, then-Gov. Robert Bentley signed a invoice that criminalized on a regular basis actions like transporting, using and renting properties to undocumented immigrants.

On the time, historians and authorized specialists apprehensive the regulation may usher in a brand new period of racial injustice much like Jim Crow that will be enforced by the police and courts. However the impression of the immigration regulation stays largely unknown as a result of Alabama prisons don’t accumulate ethnicity knowledge and subsequently don’t know what number of inmates are Hispanic. In 2013, the state agreed to not implement a lot of the provisions as a part of a lawsuit.

“The HB 56 laws introduced nativism and xenophobia into the political mainstream in Alabama” wrote historian Raymond Mohl. On the peak of the controversy over the regulation, a congressman from north Alabama mentioned that to stop unlawful immigration to the state, he would do “something in need of capturing them.”

Again then, these harsh insurance policies made Alabama an outlier. However with the election of President Donald Trump in 2016, the state’s positions began going mainstream. Alabama even equipped one of many foremost architects of Trump’s first-term immigration coverage: U.S. Sen. Jeff Classes, a fierce champion of border crackdowns, was tapped to be Trump’s lawyer normal.

Ruiz was arrested practically two years into Trump’s first time period. On the time, Alabama was rising extra crimson whilst a blue wave nationally elected dozens of Democrats to Congress. In Alabama, Republicans swept statewide workplace that yr and expanded their majority within the Legislature.

Some members of Ruiz’s prolonged household had began transferring to Alabama from Mexico practically 15 years earlier and stayed within the space even after the political winds turned in opposition to them. Sandra Ruiz, his 17-year-old cousin, moved from Texas to Autauga County at age 2 and had lived close to Prattville, a suburb of Montgomery, practically all her life. She knew that a few of her neighbors may very well be blind to, and even hostile to, individuals from Mexico. She and her household had been afraid for Jorge Ruiz when he was arrested and adopted the police to the station. Investigators allowed the highschool senior to translate their questions and Ruiz’s responses.

A decide granted Ruiz bond in March 2019, 4 months after he was jailed. Ruiz’s members of the family in Alabama offered tamales and arranged a raffle of an ornate belt buckle to boost funds for bail. They posted the cash to free him.

They usually started to attend.

---

Within the weeks and months main as much as Ruiz’s trial, Choose Invoice Lewis made a number of selections that, in keeping with Ruiz’s lawyer, put his shopper at an obstacle.

One of many first issues Lewis did was revoke Ruiz’s bond. Due to a technicality, Ruiz’s household by no means recovered the $5,000 they’d paid to get him out of jail. The information protection that adopted the choice sparked intense, and infrequently misinformed, debate on-line concerning the case, and Vigorous apprehensive that bias would have an effect on potential jurors. Not lengthy after Ruiz’s bond was revoked, the decide obtained a letter within the mail from an area resident. The author thanked him and requested Lewis to “do all the things in your energy to get justice for Marlena.” The letter went on to explain Ruiz as “on this nation illegally” and “working his automobile drunk.”

A few week later, Lewis denied Ruiz’s utility for youthful offender standing. That meant he wouldn’t be eligible for a sentence capped at three years. Lewis didn’t reply to a listing of questions from ProPublica, together with one about not granting Ruiz youthful offender standing.

However because the trial neared, Lewis took a number of steps to try to maintain bias out of the courtroom. He gave particular directions to the prosecution and the protection, barring any point out of Ruiz’s immigration standing and directing attorneys concerned within the case to name him “George.”

The decide’s efforts couldn’t erase the apparent distinction between Ruiz and nearly everybody else within the courtroom: the language barrier. “Longtime courthouse observers don’t recall a case in Prattville the place an interpreter was used at trial,” the Montgomery Advertiser reported.

The district lawyer had charged Ruiz underneath the reckless homicide part of the statute, reserved for offenders who unintentionally trigger a loss of life. Courts have discovered that driving and not using a license, a misdemeanor that in Alabama carries a fantastic of $10 to $100, doesn’t represent underlying recklessness for fees like manslaughter or homicide. Prosecutors solely briefly introduced up at Ruiz’s trial that he didn’t have a license. What made the case quantity to homicide, the prosecutor mentioned all through the case, was that Ruiz was each rushing and had crossed the middle line.

Ruiz’s use of alcohol additionally performed a central position within the trial, regardless that he hadn’t been charged with DUI — and regardless that the prosecutors conceded that the proof didn’t assist that cost. A toxicologist testified that nearly 4 hours had handed between the crash and the blood check on the hospital. He mentioned the common elimination price for alcohol is 0.015 proportion factors an hour. That testimony instructed Ruiz’s blood alcohol stage would have been increased than 0.07 on the time of the accident.

If the prosecutors may scientifically affirm that determine, it will have been sufficient to cost Ruiz with DUI as a result of the authorized intoxication threshold is decrease for underage drivers. However such estimates have been described as unreliable by some scientists and authorized specialists, with one calling them no higher than a “wild guess.” Some states have imposed increased bars than Alabama for the admission of such proof, and at the very least one, Massachusetts, doesn’t enable it in any respect if the blood alcohol studying was, like Ruiz’s, beneath 0.03.

Vigorous produced no professional to dispute the toxicologist. Actually, he known as just one witness, Ruiz’s date the night time of the competition, who testified that Ruiz rode together with her to her condominium after the competition, at round 1:30 a.m., and slept on the sofa till he left at round 5 a.m.

Vigorous mentioned in his closing argument that the proof failed to indicate that Ruiz’s habits was so openly harmful that it amounted to homicide.

“This was an individual who was driving residence and fell asleep behind the wheel,” Vigorous mentioned.

Then-Chief Assistant District Lawyer C.J. Robinson mentioned there was no proof Ruiz fell asleep. “In Alabama, we acknowledge that you are able to do one thing so harmful that it may kill anyone, and it is best to understand what you’re doing is that harmful,” he mentioned throughout closing arguments. “I undergo you that anybody’s life was in peril, and subsequently it was reckless homicide.”

Jurors had been instructed that, as an alternative choice to homicide, additionally they may contemplate the lesser fees of manslaughter or criminally negligent murder. They deliberated for lower than an hour.

The foreman introduced responsible verdicts on three counts: minor in possession of alcohol, driving and not using a license and homicide.

Three weeks later, everybody gathered once more for the sentencing. Robinson invited members of Hayes’ household to talk about their loss.

The household, together with associates, had come to each listening to. Hayes’ mom, Laura Liveoak, had spoken out on social media about her grief, describing how her daughter had texted her proper earlier than she left work that morning, asking what the climate was like. Liveoak mentioned in a Fb video: “It’s arduous to be the guardian of a sufferer, understanding that she’ll by no means be a mom. I’ll by no means be a grandmother to the candy little redheaded children that she in all probability would have had.” She declined to remark for this story.

Liveoak instructed the decide how a lot her daughter beloved being a nurse: a lot that she spent a few of her days off visiting sufferers. She’d lately purchased a home in a close-by city, Deatsville, and adopted two German shepherds who turned the middle of her world. She’d texted her mother proper earlier than she left work that morning. Her final message was about her canines.

Then it was Ruiz’s flip. He spoke for the primary time in court docket.

“I wish to say that I’m sorry to the household,” Ruiz mentioned. “I wouldn’t have wished for this to occur. I want that this could have solely been a dream.”

Lewis peered down from the bench at Ruiz.

“That is America,” Lewis mentioned. “It’s the best nation on the planet and now we have the fitting to trial on this nation. I’d by no means penalize you for exercising that proper, however Mr. Vigorous talked about acceptance of accountability, contrition, regret. I haven’t seen any of that from you.”

He sentenced Ruiz to the utmost attainable punishment, longer even than the 50 years requested by prosecutors: 99 years.

The court docket went quiet. Even the prosecutor was shocked.

Years later, Robinson remembered that second. “That was not one thing that I had anticipated,” he mentioned.

---

In 2023, 4 years after the sentencing, a human rights lawyer from Mexico reached out to the Southern Middle for Human Rights, a nonprofit regulation middle in Atlanta that focuses on felony justice. He allow them to know that the Mexican Consulate had been following Ruiz’s case from the time he was arrested by means of the slow-moving appeals course of. His 99-year sentence had shocked them, they usually wished to discover a lawyer within the U.S. who may steer the more and more sophisticated enchantment.

Ruiz’s household had cobbled collectively cash for a personal lawyer, who filed motions to problem his conviction and sentence. However that they had run out of funds. Ruiz was making ready to symbolize himself when the attorneys from the middle stepped in.

“I used to be like, ‘We have to assist this child,’” SCHR lawyer Paulina Lucio-Maymon mentioned. “In any other case, he’s simply gonna find yourself forgotten by the system.”

The Mexican Consulate related Lucio-Maymon and her colleague Michael Admirand with household from Prattville, who in flip related the attorneys with household in Ruiz’s hometown, José María Pino Suárez, within the Mexican state of Durango. Many within the small group knew Ruiz. As a younger boy, he had helped his grandfather work a shared plot of farmland and handle his livestock. He dropped out after center college to assist his household and obtained his visa to return to the U.S. within the spring of 2018. He wanted to make more cash after his mom’s sudden loss of life.

“He was all the time making an attempt to verify everybody was taken care of,” mentioned his cousin, Sandra Ruiz.

Within the U.S., he was a part of an all-immigrant crew of short-term visa staff employed by a contractor for the ability firm. The group trudged by means of Georgia and South Carolina backcountry, their ft snagging on roots and vines as they cleared vegetation from energy traces. They typically walked for 10 to 12 hours a day whereas carrying heavy canisters of weed-killing chemical compounds, and Ruiz suffered warmth stroke twice, one in every of Ruiz’s fellow staff testified in an enchantment listening to. Staff wore out their footwear each eight days, the employee mentioned.

Ruiz wished to spend his previous couple of weeks within the U.S. visiting household in Prattville earlier than returning to Mexico. He missed his daughter, Noeli, and had begun planning for her third birthday.

None of that historical past had been introduced at his sentencing listening to. His lawyer additionally failed to focus on his clear felony file in Mexico.

In September 2019, lower than a month after he handed down that 99-year sentence, Lewis had issued an uncommon order. He eliminated Vigorous from the case regardless of there being no movement searching for his elimination. Lewis decided Ruiz had acquired insufficient illustration.

Lewis cited an offhand remark Vigorous made on the sentencing listening to. In response to the decide admonishing Ruiz for not being contrite, Vigorous instructed the decide that the choice to take Ruiz’s case to trial “could also be extra of a mirrored image of my unhealthy recommendation to him than his personal acceptance of accountability.” Lewis wrote that he noticed that as an admission that Vigorous was questioning his personal illustration of Ruiz. (Vigorous later instructed ProPublica he was making an attempt to “deflect a few of Choose Lewis’ criticism of Jorge onto me” and lamented how “that one sentence has been used as a cudgel in opposition to me and a software to scapegoat me on this case.”)

Within the hearings and filings that adopted, Lewis continued to specific considerations concerning the data that had not been introduced at trial or sentencing.

“The Court docket, when rendering a sentence on this case ought to have as a lot data as attainable,” Lewis wrote in a newer order. “Mr. Vigorous failed to supply any, regardless of gaining access to many various sources of knowledge that would have affected the Defendant’s sentence.”

Vigorous did present some proof at Ruiz’s sentencing, calling his aunt and cousin to testify. The Alabama Court docket of Legal Appeals later rejected a declare of ineffective help of counsel in opposition to him.

In a press release to ProPublica, Vigorous wrote that he believed he competently defended Ruiz. He mentioned that he solely known as one trial witness as a result of he felt the state had not confirmed his shopper’s guilt. He pointed to the state’s specialists, who testified that Ruiz had a really low stage of alcohol in his system and drifted slowly into oncoming visitors, which, in keeping with Vigorous, confirmed Ruiz didn’t deliberately jerk the automotive throughout the middle line. “Essentially the most highly effective witness is one which known as by the opposition who proves your case,” Vigorous wrote.

He additionally described the case as “probably the most traumatic” he’s encountered in his 30 years as an lawyer. “I’ve made the regulation my life’s work, and Jorge’s case precipitated me to query nearly all the things I believed concerning the authorized system,” he wrote.

When Lucio-Maymon and Admirand first took on Ruiz’s case, they appealed each his homicide conviction and his 99-year sentence. Lewis rejected their problem of Ruiz’s conviction however agreed the sentence deserved one other look.

To make their case for a shorter sentence, Ruiz’s attorneys compiled details about different deadly automotive crash circumstances. His former attorneys had appealed his conviction to the Alabama Court docket of Legal Appeals and misplaced. The one notable dissent on the panel of judges was penned by Republican Choose J. William Cole, who wrote that the info didn’t assist a homicide conviction.

“Ruiz had consumed alcohol earlier than the accident, however he was not decided to be legally intoxicated, nor was he charged with driving drunk,” Cole wrote. “Though he crossed to the unsuitable aspect of the street, there was no proof that he was racing or driving in a grossly wanton method.”

Admirand and Lucio-Maymon regarded on the 4 circumstances cited within the determination to uphold his conviction. The drivers in these circumstances had blood alcohol ranges that ranged from 0.16 to 0.3 — from double to just about quadruple the extent of felony intoxication. Their sentences ranged from 12 to 25 years in jail.

The attorneys created a easy graph that in contrast these sentences and blood alcohol ranges. Though Ruiz had the bottom quantity of alcohol in his system, his sentence was by far the longest.

After Lewis granted a brand new sentencing listening to, Admirand and Lucio-Maymon felt hopeful. That disparity — together with testimony from Ruiz’s family and friends in Mexico — may assist sway the decide towards mercy, they believed. They mentioned they even began speaking with the district lawyer’s workplace with the purpose of creating a deal, although Robinson mentioned he remembered these conversations otherwise. He recalled that he agreed to hearken to proof about Ruiz’s background however wouldn’t contemplate decreasing the cost and could be hard-pressed to suggest lower than 50 years.

“They did initially specific some openness to dialogue on this case,” Admirand mentioned. “After which one thing modified.”

---

Though Lewis had presided over Ruiz’s trial and granted him a resentencing listening to, he was not behind the bench at when Ruiz was set to be resentenced in 2024. By then, Lewis had been appointed to the Alabama Court docket of Civil Appeals.

The case was transferred to Sibley Reynolds, who had retired from the bench however nonetheless took circumstances as wanted. When Admirand and Lucio-Maymon arrived early on Aug. 14, 2024, to organize, they discovered the decide sitting within the courtroom, paging by means of a purple binder that they had by no means seen earlier than. It contained footage of Hayes and letters from associates, members of the family and even just a few native officers.

Every of the handfuls of letters urged the decide to uphold Ruiz’s 99-year sentence. Prosecutors requested the decide for 50 years. Lucio-Maymon and Admirand, citing a number of sentences from circumstances throughout the nineteenth Circuit Court docket, had been searching for 10 years.

Admirand mentioned he watched as Reynolds carried the binder with him to the bench. The listening to he oversaw was quick however eventful. At one level, Ruiz addressed Hayes’ household.

“I’m profoundly sorry for having precipitated you this ache,” he mentioned. “I wish to say I’m sorry or forgive me, the best way I’ve requested God to do on daily basis in the course of the nearly six years.”

Admirand introduced all of the proof he believed had been lacking from Ruiz’s first sentencing listening to in 2019. He instructed the decide concerning the circumstances that they had present in the identical judicial district with sentences that ranged from one to 25 years. And he introduced mitigating elements — witnesses who testified about Ruiz’s character and work ethic.

His attorneys additionally performed a collection of movies of members of the family in Mexico, accompanied by dramatic music.

When Robinson, who had been elected district lawyer in 2022, began to make his argument in opposition to Ruiz, he invoked a patriotic anthem as a kind of rebuttal. He mentioned the sufferer’s household was prepared to maneuver on and that he was going to make a case for them “courtesy of the crimson, white and blue.”

It was a reference to the title of the Toby Keith music “Courtesy of the Purple, White and Blue,” which incorporates lyrics like, “We’ll put a boot in your ass, it’s the American approach.” Robinson would later inform ProPublica the remark was taken out of context and was meant as a critique of the music within the video, which he described as “manipulative.”

Shortly after, Hayes’ mom requested the decide to uphold the unique sentence.

“I’m asking for the 99 years that Choose Lewis noticed match to present,” she mentioned. “Marlena’s life is price that and a lot extra.”

On the finish of the listening to, the decide introduced his determination: He would scale back Ruiz’s sentence to 50 years.

He didn’t supply a proof for why he selected what’s nonetheless an unusually lengthy sentence. Admirand suspected the rationale is perhaps discovered within the purple binder. He objected to the decide contemplating it with out the protection having seen it. He then requested for a duplicate of the fabric.

“I imply, it’s actually letters from the sufferer’s household,” mentioned Assistant District Lawyer Mandy Johnson in response to the objection.

When Admirand learn it proper after the listening to, he discovered rather more than that, together with notes from native public officers and incorrect details about the case. He mentioned that, extra alarmingly, there have been letters that included language he thought of biased. One letter mentioned that if Ruiz was launched early and deported, he would absolutely return to the U.S.

“He’ll once more commit crimes,” the letter mentioned. “He’ll once more be a draw on our judicial system and society itself. He’ll as soon as once more be an pointless risk to all our lives, together with yours.”

“Fry him!” demanded one other one.

Excerpts of Letters Reviewed by the Choose in a Sentencing Listening to

Obtained by ProPublica. Highlights added by ProPublica.

The binder introduced a chance to problem what Admirand had come to imagine was an underlying bias that permeated the case from the primary moments after the crash, when a state trooper threatened to take Ruiz to jail if he didn’t communicate English. In September 2024, he and Lucio-Maymon filed a movement for a brand new trial, arguing that the letters contained improper references to Ruiz’s nationality, together with racially derogatory claims. In February, the Mexican Consulate filed an amicus temporary in assist of the enchantment, solely the second time in 5 years it has accomplished that in a felony case in america.

“Ruiz’s equal safety rights had been violated from the second this prosecution started,” the enchantment mentioned. “From his earliest interactions with regulation enforcement by means of the resentencing proceedings, Ruiz was handled extra harshly than different equally located defendants due to his race. The Court docket ought to treatment this injustice.”

In June, Ruiz’s attorneys recognized one other 17 automotive crash circumstances over 15 years that had been heard within the nineteenth Circuit Court docket. Most defendants acquired sentences of lower than 15 years in jail, even in circumstances involving a number of fatalities or excessive blood alcohol ranges. Just one, Ruiz, had a sentence longer than 25 years. Robinson argued these circumstances had been totally different, although not due to the defendant’s race. Defendants in most of them had accepted plea offers. He didn’t acknowledge that each one of these plea offers had been extra lenient than the one supplied to Ruiz.

Lewis didn’t reply to questions, together with ones about alleged bias within the case. In response to ProPublica’s questions, Robinson wrote that neither he nor the district lawyer’s workplace “handled Jorge Ruiz extra harshly than different equally located defendants due to his race.”

Although the district lawyer’s workplace didn’t cost Ruiz with DUI, Robinson wrote that alcohol “was illegally consumed at a price a lot increased than legally permissible for Ruiz to be working a automobile.” He additionally wrote, “I don’t assess circumstances utilizing a least frequent denominator method. I do my greatest to judge them based mostly on a totality of the circumstances method.”

In August, the Alabama Court docket of Legal Appeals requested for extra data from Reynolds about his reasoning behind the 50-year sentence. Admirand and Lucio-Maymon have requested the court docket to take Reynolds off the case, arguing that he improperly reviewed the purple binder materials. Reynolds didn’t reply to ProPublica’s questions.

Hayes’ members of the family have been outspoken about their loss. At each listening to, they tick off the milestones Hayes has missed. Her brother’s commencement. Her sister’s wedding ceremony. The births of nieces and nephews.

Ruiz’s members of the family are quietly marking off their very own record. His daughter’s kindergarten commencement, her First Communion. The 9-year-old nonetheless doesn’t fairly comprehend the place he has gone.

Ruiz has discovered a bit of English however nonetheless struggles with the language. He mentioned by means of his attorneys that he’s by no means been in a position to adequately convey how unhealthy he feels concerning the accident. It’s not simply the language barrier, but additionally that his position in Hayes’ loss of life left him so distraught that he felt like “my life didn’t matter anymore.”

Nonetheless, the listening to final yr that lowered his sentence kindled some optimism. He mentioned that when he first confronted the prospect of 99 years behind bars, the one factor he may take into consideration was by no means seeing his daughter once more. After the listening to, his outlook modified.

“That gave me again hope that in the future I’ll be capable of see my household once more,” Ruiz mentioned.