As 2025 enters its remaining months, Disney inches nearer to the announcement the complete leisure trade has been ready for — who will take over for Bob Iger as the corporate’s subsequent CEO.
Disney has publicly said it’ll title Iger’s successor in early 2026. Two inside candidates stand out because the probably contenders: Disney Leisure co-chairman Dana Walden and Disney Experiences chairman Josh D’Amaro. Walden brings many years of Hollywood experience; D’Amaro labored in client merchandise earlier than his elevation within the theme parks division all the best way as much as working the unit when its earlier chief, Bob Chapek, was named Disney CEO in 2020.
Given Walden’s and D’Amaro’s complementary talent units — and given latest momentum behind co-CEO appointments each in media and past — the Disney board might decide to pick each to collectively exchange Iger.
It is a technique rival Netflix has equally — and successfully — used since 2020, when Reed Hastings named Ted Sarandos his co-CEO. Three years later, Hastings relinquished that publish and moved on to grow to be the corporate’s govt chairman, elevating Greg Peters into his spot as co-CEO.
Final 12 months, Iger referred to as Sarandos and requested him about Netflix’s co-CEO mannequin, CNBC has confirmed, based mostly on interviews with folks conversant in the matter. That decision was first reported by the Wall Road.
Netflix’s success has contributed to a latest co-CEO wave. Final month, Spotify named Alex Norstrom and Gustav Soderstrom as co-CEOs to exchange founder Daniel Ek; Oracle named Clay Magouyrk and Mike Sicilia to collectively lead the corporate; and Comcast tapped president Mike Cavanagh to hitch longtime CEO Brian Roberts within the chief function.
However whereas a twin CEO construction might superficially make sense for Disney, firm insiders and company governance consultants warn there are concerns particular to the Mouse Home that might make such a dynamic unwise.
The Netflix technique
Netflix has a selected set of circumstances that make a co-CEO construction workable.
For starters, Sarandos and co-CEO Peters have completely different areas of ardour, in keeping with folks conversant in Netflix’s management types, who requested to stay unnamed as a result of the small print are non-public. That is allowed the 2 leaders to make selections with out stepping on one another’s toes.
If Sarandos and Peters disagree on one thing, they work it out by deferring to the chief who’s extra passionate concerning the reply. That usually means Sarandos wins out if it is a content material or artistic choice, and Peters triumphs if the choice is extra product- or technology-based. A Netflix spokesperson declined to remark.
If there is a gray space, the co-CEOs can all the time fall again on Hastings, the corporate’s co-founder and CEO of 25 years. Peters and Sarandos labored collectively below Hastings for a few years. That consolation stage — and Netflix’s famously un-hierarchical company tradition — have helped preserve a twin CEO construction with out turf wars and whereas serving shareholders, Sarandos instructed Iger, in keeping with the folks acquainted.
Since Peters stepped in as co-CEO in January 2023, Netflix shares have gained about 275%.
Disney’s alternative
At first look, Walden and D’Amaro current an analogous dynamic to Sarandos and Peters. Walden’s experience is Hollywood, and D’Amaro’s is parks and client merchandise. Iger might theoretically advance to the chief chairman function, conserving him round in a similar way to Hastings.
Dana Walden and Josh D’Amaro.
Michael Buckner | Errich Petersen | Getty Pictures
Deciding on each Walden and D’Amaro as Iger’s long-awaited successor might permit Disney to maintain each leaders on the firm. If the board chooses one over the opposite, Disney dangers dropping a high govt who might want an opportunity to be CEO elsewhere. This occurred to Disney in 2020, when streaming chief Kevin Mayer departed the corporate to grow to be TikTok’s CEO after he was handed over for Chapek.
However a Disney co-CEO association additionally comes with a lot of crimson flags that do not exist at different corporations.
First, if Iger sticks round on the board, some staff — and exterior companions — should view him as a CEO. That would undercut the power-sharing construction of two CEOs, particularly given Iger’s status for wanting to stay the corporate’s No. 1 chief.
Whereas Hastings has turned his consideration to hobbies like snowboarding since giving up his CEO function, Iger has developed a status for wanting to hold round as Disney’s head honcho. He is 5 instances pushed backed retirement to stay on the helm, and he got here again to exchange Chapek in 2022 after hand-picking him as his substitute.
Second, throughout Chapek’s tenure, Iger did not totally surrender his operational duties straight away, selecting to direct the corporate’s “artistic endeavors” for greater than a 12 months. That led to an unpleasant power-sharing scenario between Iger and Chapek, as CNBC detailed in 2023. Even when Walden and D’Amaro have completely different area strengths, selecting a co-CEO mannequin after struggling by means of a latest time interval the place management strains have been blurred could also be a case of failing to be taught from one’s errors.
Third, Walden and D’Amaro have not labored collectively so long as Peters and Sarandos (or different co-leader preparations with long-term success, reminiscent of CAA’s co-chairman association with Bryan Lourd, Richard Lovett and Kevin Huvane). Walden did work in a co-chair association with Gary Newman at Fox for a few years working Fox TV, proving she’s able to succeeding in such an association, however it’s unclear if she’d relish the chance to return to a pairing.
Fourth, Disney’s company tradition is famously political. The corporate has had a number of tortured succession processes with Iger and Disney’s former CEO Michael Eisner. Whereas Netflix is basically untouched by M&A, Disney is an amalgam of many acquisitions and items over time, together with ABC, ESPN, Fox, Pixar, Marvel and Lucasfilm. That is introduced staff from many various cultures collectively, quite than breeding a unified company mindset from its founding.
“It would not work for Disney,” a senior media govt instructed CNBC privately. “There could be a lot backbiting. That is the way it’s all the time been there.”
A Disney spokesperson declined to remark.
Netflix vs. custom
On high of all of that, conventional company governance consultants have broadly dismissed a co-CEO setup as suboptimal.
About 1.2% of corporations within the Russell 3000 index have employed a co-CEO construction at any given time lately, The Wall Road Journal reported final month, citing information from Equilar.
“While you create two sources of authority in a company, that is by no means good,” mentioned Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Heart for Company Governance on the College of Delaware, in an interview. “Two in cost means nobody is in cost.”
Nonetheless, there are mitigating elements that may make a co-CEO association extra palatable, Elson mentioned. Having Hastings as govt chairman is probably going essential for Netflix as a result of he can act as a de-facto tiebreaker in a co-CEO association.
Equally, a co-CEO construction can work if it is clearly executed for more-drawn-out succession planning, reminiscent of Comcast’s choice to raise Cavanagh to co-CEO alongside Roberts, mentioned Elson.
When push involves shove, Hastings and Roberts could make the deciding calls on the most important selections, Elson mentioned. Roberts is Comcast’s controlling shareholder. Oracle equally has a controlling shareholder in co-founder Larry Ellison.
Whereas Iger might play a tie-breaking function for Disney as govt chairman, he is not a founding father of the corporate and owns lower than 1% of shares excellent. That offers him much less pores and skin within the recreation for the Disney’s future than somebody like Roberts or Ellison, famous Elson.
Deciding on only one CEO could also be a leap of religion for the Disney board, however it’s higher than organising instability, mentioned Elson.
“Inevitably, one CEO dominates and the opposite one goes away,” he mentioned. “That is the character of humanity.”
Disclosure: Comcast is the mother or father firm of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would grow to be the brand new mother or father firm of CNBC upon Comcast’s deliberate spinoff of Versant.
