Novo Nordisk has raised its provide to purchase out weight problems biotech Metsera to $10bn as a bidding battle with Pfizer intensifies.
That is up from the $8.5bn that Novo provided final week when it submitted its preliminary, sudden, “unsolicited” provide. This provide shook the pharma sector after it appeared that Pfizer’s $7.3bn provide to take over Metsera was all however sure.
Beneath the newest proposal, Novo Nordisk would purchase all excellent shares of Metsera’s widespread inventory at a value of $62.20 per share in money, equal to an approximate aggregated fairness worth of $7.2bn.
The provide contains contingent worth rights (CVRs) for as much as $24.00 per share, an approximate aggregated worth of as much as $2.8bn primarily based on the achievement of sure medical and regulatory milestones. The brand new $10bn provide has been described as “superior” by Metsera’s board of administrators.
Pfizer refutes these claims, stating that Novo Nordisk’s provide “can’t qualify as superior” because the transaction is unlikely to be accomplished because of the “regulatory threat” related to it.
In the meantime, Novo Nordisk believes that the newest proposal, together with the construction of the transaction, complies with all relevant legal guidelines and highlights the corporate’s “dedication to investing within the US and curiosity in persevering with to develop the dimensions of its US investments”.
This up to date provide comes after Pfizer additionally upped its provide to $8.1bn to try to entice Metsera again.
In a Halloween scare, Pfizer launched a lawsuit towards each Metsera and Novo Nordisk on 31 October. The lawsuit, filed within the Delaware Court docket of Chancery, alleges that Novo Nordisk and Metsera breached the contractual merger settlement, claiming “breach of contract, breach of fiduciary obligation, and tortious interference”.
In the identical lawsuit, Pfizer had additionally requested the Delaware Court docket of Chancery to concern a brief restraining order to dam Metsera from terminating the Pfizer merger settlement and seeks all acceptable treatments to make sure the phrases of the merger settlement are totally enforced. This has been rejected by the courtroom, with one other listening to scheduled for five November.
Pfizer has since launched a second lawsuit towards the businesses, in addition to Metsera’s controlling shareholders, alleging Novo Nordisk’s provide violates Part 7 of the Clayton Act due to the anticompetitive results it will have within the US GLP-1RA sector.
Pfizer additionally claims that it constitutes an anticompetitive conspiracy between Novo Nordisk and Metsera in restraint of commerce in violation of Part 1 of the Sherman Act, and that it constitutes tried monopolisation and conspiracy to monopolise below Part 2 of the Sherman Act.
