California Republicans aren’t taking Tuesday’s landslide victory for redistricting sitting down, as a substitute asserting the morning after the statewide particular election that they’ve filed a federal lawsuit to problem Proposition 50.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs alleged the poll measure violates the 14th and fifteenth amendments by unconstitutionally gerrymandering congressional districts to favor one race.
Though the U.S. Supreme Courtroom has up to now permitted gerrymandered maps in restricted situations to guard minority voters beneath the Voting Rights Act, the attorneys mentioned there was no proof that gerrymandering to favor Hispanics, within the case of Proposition 50, was needed.
Other than the California Republican Get together, Assemblymember David Tangipa, R-Clovis, and 18 California voters are events to the lawsuit. It named as defendants Gov. Gavin Newsom, who pushed for Proposition 50, in addition to California Secretary of State Shirley Weber.
“We haven’t reviewed the lawsuit, but when it’s from the California Republican Get together and (U.S. Division of Justice Assistant Lawyer Normal) Harmeet Dhillon’s legislation agency, it’s going to fail,” mentioned Brandon Richards, a spokesperson for Newsom’s workplace. He added: “Good luck, losers.”
Shortly after polls closed Tuesday, the particular election was referred to as in favor of Proposition 50, a powerful victory for Newsom and the trouble to extend protected Democratic Home seats in California. Supporters of the measure have mentioned it’s meant to counter related gerrymandering plans in different states that might profit Republicans within the 2026 midterm elections.
Mike Columbo, an lawyer with the Dhillon Legislation Group, which filed the lawsuit, mentioned Democrats who drew the Proposition 50 maps, in addition to members of the California Legislature, have acknowledged that the brand new maps would improve the facility of Latino voters.
“When states racially gerrymander their voting districts, the Supreme Courtroom has permitted a restricted exception to the Structure,” Columbo mentioned throughout a press convention on Wednesday, Nov. 5. “That exception requires, amongst different issues, that the favored voters are a minority whose most well-liked candidates can not get elected due to the votes of one other majority race.”
“Hispanics make up essentially the most voters within the state. … Hispanics have had incredible success in electing candidates of their alternative. Accordingly, California can not meet this exception,” Columbo mentioned.
Of word, the Dhillon Legislation Group was based by Harmeet Dhillon, who’s now an assistant lawyer basic within the civil rights division at the usDepartment of Justice. Dhillon stepped down from her function on the legislation agency in April to work for the Justice Division.
As a part of the lawsuit, the attorneys are asking for an injunction on the Proposition 50 maps, saying that congressional candidates should know in about six weeks, once they begin submitting papers to run for workplace, which maps will probably be used for the 2026 elections.
In the meantime, Home Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, decried Proposition 50 on Wednesday, calling it “an indication of desperation” by the Democratic Get together.
“They needed to trample over their very own unbiased redistricting fee. … It was a recreation to attempt to rig the election — as in case you may gerrymander California anymore,” he mentioned, noting that 43 of California’s 52 congressional districts are already held by Democrats. “It’s only a blatant instance of Gavin Newsom’s immoral management,” Johnson mentioned.
That is growing information. Verify again later for updates.
