In keeping with this 12 months’s tax submitting, the American Athletic Convention, the $150 million collegiate sports activities league that features colleges like Rice and Tulane, is striving to be a frontrunner in inclusion, however now not in range or fairness.
… We will strive to be a leader in diversity, equity, and inclusion. As a power conference, we will pursue academic and athletic excellence in the context of our core values of integrity and sportsmanship and in a culture of compliance, by being innovative in our approach, and by engaging constructively with our communities and with our peers in the greater college community.
UNICEF USA, which supports the United Nations’ humanitarian children’s mission, no longer wants a more equitable world for every child — just a better one.
The organization’s mission is to relentlessly pursue a more equitable world for every child.
And the National Association of Community Health Centers, whose tax filing once said it focused on medically underserved populations, is now “patient-centered for all.”
To promote the provision of high-quality, comprehensive and affordable health care that is coordinated, culturally and linguistically competent, and community directed for all medically underserved populations.
The changes reflect a broader retreat underway in the nonprofit world. After President Donald Trump ordered his administration to root out “illegal” diversity, equity and inclusion efforts earlier this year, opening the door to investigations and funding cuts for offenders, more than 1,000 charities rewrote their mission statements in forms they filed this year with the Internal Revenue Service, removing or minimizing language tied to race, inequity and historically disadvantaged communities, ProPublica found.
Some went further, scrubbing diversity initiatives from their websites along with commitments to building more inclusive institutions. They changed the job titles of leaders and, in some cases, even renamed themselves. An Ohio nonprofit once called the Financial Alliance for Racial Equity, for example, is now the Financial Alliance for Representation and Empowerment.
The organizations range from large nonprofits such as Seattle Children’s Hospital to smaller ones like a Minnesota-based nonprofit that promotes time with horses as a form of therapy. While many rely on government dollars — a sixth spent more than $750,000 in federal funding last year — about half of the charities that watered down their missions reported receiving no form of government funding.
“The administration’s attacks on DEI and equal opportunity efforts have created a chilling effect through fear, intimidation and confusion,” said Maya Raghu, who leads an initiative to protect DEI at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, which did not change its mission statement.
The Trump administration’s flurry of orders declared diversity programs “pernicious discrimination,” codifying an anti-DEI agenda long animated by claims that such programs disadvantage white men.
Raghu’s group has defended nonprofits from Trump’s crackdown, winning an injunction earlier this year against a Trump rule requiring government contractors to certify they did not have what it deemed unlawful DEI programs.
A separate effort by the National Urban League and the AIDS Foundation of Chicago brought a lawsuit against the Trump administration earlier this year, arguing that its executive orders were unconstitutional. The leader of one of the groups said that the administration’s actions were “based on a blatant and corrosive lie.” The group sought an injunction against the executive orders, but the effort was unsuccessful. The case is ongoing.
To identify organizations that removed DEI language from the mission statements in their tax filings, ProPublica developed its own list of about 20 DEI-related terms, including “disadvantaged” and “underrepresented.” About three quarters of the changes made to the mission statements explicitly removed at least one word on the list. The other organizations made more subtle edits to remove an emphasis on diversity and inclusion.
ProPublica reached out to hundreds of these nonprofits, big and small. Nearly all declined to discuss their changes in depth. Three organizations said they had already removed DEI language from their mission statements before Trump was elected for a second time, as part of routine strategic planning. Others, including the National Association of Community Health Centers, made distinctions between the mission statements they include in their 990 forms and their actual mission statements and said they remain committed to DEI.
“We want to be clear: NACHC’s mission to support Community Health Centers in serving medically underserved populations has not and – will not – change,” a spokesperson said in a statement. The group has used its new 990 language on its website for years but recently revised it, too. Now the group says on its website it wants to improve “health for all.”
Tom Fenstermaker, the director of communications for the American Athletic Conference, described the organization’s removal of references to diversity and equity as “simply a change in words” and emphasized the group’s commitment to “inclusive excellence.”
UNICEF USA did not respond to requests for comment.
The White House and the IRS also did not respond to requests for comment.
Adapt or DEI
For some organizations, the commitment to diversity appears to swing like a pendulum.
In the spring of 2020, as the murder of George Floyd by a white police officer spurred a racial reckoning, institutions across the public and private sectors scrambled to meet the public’s demand for action.
Scores of public companies promised lofty investments: Comcast pledged to invest $100 million to “fight injustice and inequality.” Facebook committed $200 million to Black-owned businesses and organizations.
Nonprofit tax records filed between 2019 and 2025 show a notable increase in references to many common DEI terms in mission statements filed after Floyd’s death. Those records also reflect a substantial increase in the number of leaders whose titles include some reference to DEI.
In October 2020, Teach for America, the $200 million nonprofit that places recent college graduates in schools serving low-income students, announced a new hire to lead its efforts centering DEI across the institution’s work. Longtime former CEO Elisa Villanueva Beard appointed Barbara Logan Smith as its newest head of diversity, equity and inclusiveness. The announcement described how “TFA is grounded in a commitment” to these values and linked to a page on the organization’s website that prominently displayed its pledge.
It wasn’t the charity’s first such commitment. The group adopted a diversity statement in 2007 and later created an Office of Diversity and Inclusiveness, but scrapped the department within the decade, according to news reports.
Since Trump took office earlier this year, the tides have turned again. Teach for America removed the DEI section from its website, cut out references to equity in the mission statement in its tax filings and changed Smith’s title to chief of experience and belonging.
Other nonprofits have made similar pivots. The National Council on Aging, which calls itself the first national voice for older adults and reported $100 million in revenue last year, revealed an ambitious plan in 2021 to address health disparities among aging Americans, aiming to assist those “that have been left behind for so many years [and] which have skilled so many disadvantages,” its president and chief government officer, Ramsey Alwin, mentioned on the time.
However in its newest tax filings, the group eradicated references to “susceptible” and “deprived” communities in its mission assertion; it has additionally eliminated the “Fairness Promise” web page on its web site.
In a press release, a Train for America spokesperson emphasised its dedication to cultivating educators in rural and concrete areas, and guaranteeing that each baby within the nation has entry to high quality schooling.
“Now we have made adjustments to our language to make our dedication to all kids clearer,” the assertion learn.
The Nationwide Council on Growing old didn’t reply to a listing of questions on its DEI efforts and the adjustments it made to its mission assertion.
Even organizations which have lengthy used DEI language to explain their work are altering their messaging. Galt Basis, a staffing agency centered on increasing entry to employment alternatives for folks with disabilities, referenced range and inclusion in its tax filings for nearly a decade till it eliminated the phrases from its most up-to-date disclosure.
Galt’s chief, Lisa Doyle, instructed ProPublica that eradicating references to range and inclusion on its tax filings was a enterprise resolution and that the group’s precise mission has not modified.
“Now we have a accountability to adapt whereas staying true to our mission,” Doyle mentioned in an interview. “So if we have now to adapt our language to be sure that we’re capable of proceed to create that entry, then that’s what we have to do.”
Set off Warning
Because the Trump administration deployed AI instruments to establish and root out so-called woke ideology in government-funded applications, establishments throughout the nation have been compelled to contemplate pragmatic adjustments to handle potential danger.
The administration has been aggressive in what it labels as DEI: A ProPublica evaluate of grants terminated by the Nationwide Institutes of Well being earlier this 12 months discovered that tasks swept up within the dragnet included these to curb stillbirths, baby suicides and toddler mind injury. Funding for a few of these tasks was reinstated following a lawsuit, however many stay canceled.
Establishments rushed to erase language that may set off a response; their edit trails present perception into the calculations on how far is simply too far when acknowledging inequality and advocating in opposition to it.
The adjustments to charity mission statements reveal widespread methods that organizations seem like utilizing to reframe their work with out DEI.
1
Technique One
Do not identify the deprived racial teams
CodePath is reprogramming increased schooling to create the most numerous era of engineers, CTOs, and founders. We ship industry-vetted programs and profession help centered on the wants of Black, Latino/a, Indigenous,
first AI-native era of engineers, CTOs, and founders. We ship industry-vetted programs and profession help centered on the wants of first-generation and low-income college students. Our college students prepare with senior engineers, intern at prime corporations, and rise collectively to grow to be the tech leaders of tomorrow
2
Technique Two
Do not acknowledge the previous
AI4ALL opens doorways to the factitious intelligence {industry} for traditionally excluded expertise by way of schooling and mentorship.
‘s mission is to make sure that the following era of AI leaders displays humanity. AI4ALL is remodeling the pipeline of AI practitioners who will form AI for the good thing about humanity.
3
Technique Three
Gloss over the small print — and that means
America On Tech (AOT) is dedicated to reducing racial wealth hole in underserved and underestimated communities by creating pathways for college kids of colour into levels and careers in expertise. AOT applications are structured to finish cycles of poverty, put college students in the direction of a path to financial empowerment, allow under-resourced colleges to ship prime quality tech-education, advance a number of profession pathways for younger folks, and transcend schooling to make sure that underestimated college students are positioned for fulfillment. AOT seeks to scale its program mannequin and to foster systemic change by altering the face of the tech sector to more and more embody folks of colour from low-income communities.
Put together the following era of expertise leaders from underestimated communities by serving to college students receive levels and careers in expertise
CodePath, AI4ALL and America On Tech didn’t reply to questions on why they made the edits.
Such adjustments haven’t helped at the least one group evade discover.
Not lengthy after Trump’s second inauguration, the Middle for Workforce Inclusion, a nonprofit that helps older staff with job coaching and placement, modified the mission assertion on its web site to take away a dedication to “particularly” serving to low-income and deprived adults.
By March, the group had gone a step additional and altered its identify to CWI Works.
Regardless of the edits, the White Home nonetheless known as CWI Works a “leftist, DEI-promoting” entity in Could, when the administration proposed sweeping cuts to the Senior Neighborhood Service Employment Program, a important supply of funding for the group. CWI’s tax data, filed with the IRS later that month, listed its new identify and mission.
The administration’s actions have had an acute impression on the group’s work. In a LinkedIn publish, the group’s president and CEO mentioned CWI, like different grant recipients, was positioned within the “really terrible” place of getting to furlough tens of 1000’s of older job seekers and a few of its personal employees after the Trump administration froze funding for the SCSEP grant program.
Rita Santelli, a spokesperson for CWI, mentioned the group is dedicated to making sure that its programming is “accessible and efficient for all older staff.”
Gene Takagi, a lawyer whose agency makes a speciality of working with nonprofits, mentioned there isn’t a single proper reply on whether or not nonprofits ought to take away DEI language.
In a latest weblog publish, he advised that organizations may mitigate dangers of “unfair authorities intrusion” by eradicating references to DEI phrases in public communications like 990s, however reaffirm their dedication to range and inclusion in direct messages to stakeholders and funders.
In an interview with ProPublica, Takagi in contrast the Trump administration’s actions to a bully drawing a line within the sand and acknowledged that issues may worsen if organizations publicly retreat from their DEI values en masse.
“It’s not till any individual takes a step ahead and says, ‘No, I don’t settle for that,’ that issues are going to alter,” Takagi mentioned.
Some charities have stored their missions intact, even in paperwork filed to the federal government.
BrightSpark Early Studying Companies is a nonprofit within the Seattle space offering reasonably priced baby care providers to households, a lot of whom are low-income. The group’s curriculum has lengthy been rooted in a racial fairness lens, and its mission assertion explicitly mentions its “anti-racist” strategy to schooling. Greater than 1 / 4 of the group’s income got here from federal grants final 12 months.
YWCA USA, a social justice group whose mission features a dedication to “eliminating racism [and] empowering ladies,” has additionally stood behind its robust language. A number of dozen of the native YWCA associations across the nation have adopted go well with.
Neither BrightSpark nor YWCA USA agreed to talk with ProPublica, nor did every other charity that stored a dedication to DEI of their mission statements intact.
How We Reported This Story
ProPublica assembled a listing of nonprofit organizations which have submitted digital tax filings to the IRS in 2025. We used these filings to match mission statements to these from the earlier fiscal 12 months. There are two locations on the Kind 990 the place organizations are requested to explain their mission assertion: within the “Abstract” part in Half 1 and the “Assertion of Program Service Accomplishments” in Half 3. Our evaluation relied on the textual content included in Half 3, the place organizations usually give essentially the most expansive descriptions of their mission, however we checked the statements included in Half 1 to see if DEI commitments appeared there.
To evaluate whether or not organizations eliminated any language linked to range, fairness and inclusion, we developed a listing of key phrases generally related to DEI and checked whether or not they had been eliminated. We didn’t distinguish between variations in punctuation. Then we used synthetic intelligence to flag extra delicate adjustments that didn’t embody these key phrases. The record of key phrases included iterations of the phrases range, fairness, inclusion, accessibility, racism, folks of colour, underserved, underrepresented, oppressed, deprived, minority, BIPOC, indigenous, marginalized, gender, LGBT, discrimination and low-income. Generally a company eliminated one of many key phrases however nonetheless stored a transparent dedication to range and inclusion in its mission assertion. These organizations have been faraway from the ultimate tally when reporters manually reviewed every group’s two most up-to-date mission statements.
