By DIDI TANG
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Communications Fee on Monday stated it could ban new foreign-made drones, a transfer that can hold new Chinese language-made drones equivalent to these from DJI and Autel out of the U.S. market.
The announcement got here a 12 months after Congress handed a protection invoice that raised nationwide safety issues about Chinese language-made drones, which have develop into a dominant participant within the U.S., broadly utilized in farming, mapping, legislation enforcement and filmmaking.
The invoice known as for stopping the 2 Chinese language firms from promoting new drones within the U.S. if a evaluation discovered they posed a threat to American nationwide safety. The deadline for the evaluation was Dec. 23.
The FCC stated Monday the evaluation discovered that every one drones and demanding parts produced in overseas nations, not simply by the 2 Chinese language firms, posed “unacceptable dangers to the nationwide safety of america and to the protection and safety of U.S. individuals.” But it surely stated particular drones or parts can be exempt if the Pentagon or Division of Homeland Safety decided they didn’t pose such dangers.
The FCC cited upcoming main occasions, such because the 2026 World Cup, America250 celebrations and the 2028 Summer season Olympics in Los Angeles, as causes to deal with potential drone threats posed by “criminals, hostile overseas actors, and terrorists.”
Michael Robbins, president and chief government officer of AUVSI, the Affiliation for Uncrewed Car Methods Worldwide, stated in a press release that the business group welcomes the choice. He stated it’s time for the U.S. not solely to cut back its dependence on China however construct its personal drones.
“Latest historical past underscores why america should enhance home drone manufacturing and safe its provide chains,” Robbins stated, citing Beijing’s willingness to limit essential provides equivalent to uncommon earth magnets to serve its strategic pursuits.
DJI stated it was upset by the FCC choice. “Whereas DJI was not singled out, no data has been launched relating to what data was utilized by the Government Department in reaching its dedication,” it stated in a press release.
“Issues about DJI’s information safety haven’t been grounded in proof and as an alternative mirror protectionism, opposite to the rules of an open market,” the corporate stated.
In Texas, Gene Robinson has a fleet of 9 DJI drones that he makes use of for legislation enforcement coaching and forensic analyses. He stated the brand new restrictions would harm him and plenty of others who’ve come to depend on the Chinese language drones due to their versatility, excessive efficiency and reasonably priced costs.
However he stated he understands the choice and lamented that the U.S. had outsourced the manufacturing to China. “Now, we’re paying the worth,” Robinson stated. “To get again to the place we had the independence, there shall be some rising pains. We have to suck it up, and let’s not have it occur once more.”
Additionally in Texas, Arthur Erickson, chief government officer and co-founder of the drone-making firm Hylio, stated the departure of DJI would supply much-needed room for American firms like his to develop. New investments are pouring in to assist him ramp up manufacturing of spray drones, which farmers use to fertilize their fields, and it’ll deliver down costs, Erickson stated.
However he additionally known as it “loopy” and “surprising” that the FCC ought to develop the scope to all foreign-made drones and drone parts. “The way in which it’s written is a blanket assertion,” Erickson stated. “There’s a worldwide allied provide chain. I hope they may make clear that.”
![[OPINION] Main corruption scandals and instances from 1989: The place are they now?](https://www.rappler.com/tachyon/2025/12/Major-corruption-scandals-where-are-they-now-December-11-2025.jpg "[OPINION] Main corruption scandals and instances from 1989: The place are they now?")
