By STEFANIE DAZIO, Related Press
Denmark and Greenland are looking for a gathering with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio after the Trump administration doubled down on its intention to take over the strategic Arctic island, a Danish territory.
Tensions escalated after the White Home stated Tuesday that the “U.S. army is all the time an choice.” President Donald Trump has argued that the U.S. wants to regulate the world’s largest island to make sure its personal safety within the face of rising threats from China and Russia within the Arctic.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned earlier this week {that a} U.S. takeover would quantity to the tip of NATO.
“The Nordics don’t flippantly make statements like this,” Maria Martisiute, a protection analyst on the European Coverage Centre suppose tank, informed The Related Press on Wednesday. “However it’s Trump, whose very bombastic language bordering on direct threats and intimidation, is threatening the actual fact to a different ally by saying ‘I’ll management or annex the territory.’”
The leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and the UK joined Frederiksen in a press release Tuesday reaffirming that the mineral-rich island “belongs to its individuals.”
Their assertion defended the sovereignty of Greenland, which is a self-governing territory of Denmark and a part of NATO.
The U.S. army motion in Venezuela final weekend has heightened fears throughout Europe, and Trump and his advisers in current days have reiterated a want to take over the island, which guards the Arctic and North Atlantic approaches to North America.
“It’s so strategic proper now,” Trump informed reporters Sunday.
Danish International Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and his Greenland counterpart, Vivian Motzfeldt, have requested a gathering with Rubio within the close to future, in line with a press release posted Tuesday to Greenland’s authorities web site.
Earlier requests for a sit-down weren’t profitable, the assertion stated.
‘That is America now’
Thomas Crosbie, an affiliate professor of army operations on the Royal Danish Protection School, stated an American takeover wouldn’t enhance upon Washington’s present safety technique.
“The USA will achieve no benefit if its flag is flying in Nuuk versus the Greenlandic flag,” he informed the AP. “There’s no advantages to them as a result of they already take pleasure in the entire benefits they need. If there’s any particular safety entry that they need to enhance American safety, they’ll be given it as a matter after all, as a trusted ally. So this has nothing to do with enhancing nationwide safety for the US.”
Denmark’s parliament authorised a invoice final June to permit U.S. army bases on Danish soil. It widened a earlier army settlement, made in 2023 with the Biden administration, the place U.S. troops had broad entry to Danish airbases within the Scandinavian nation.
Rasmussen, in a response to lawmakers’ questions, wrote over the summer time that Denmark would have the ability to terminate the settlement if the U.S. tries to annex all or a part of Greenland.
However within the occasion of a army motion, the U.S. Division of Protection at present operates the distant Pituffik Area Base, in northwestern Greenland, and the troops there might be mobilized.
Crosbie stated he believes the U.S. wouldn’t search to harm the native inhabitants or interact with Danish troops.
“They don’t must deliver any firepower. They don’t to deliver anyone.” Crosbie stated Wednesday. “They might simply direct the army personnel at present there to drive to the middle of Nuuk and simply say, ‘That is America now,’ proper? And that will result in the identical response as in the event that they flew in 500 or 1,000 individuals.”
The hazard in an American annexation, he stated, lies within the “erosion of the rule of legislation globally and to the notion that there are any norms defending anyone on the planet.”
He added: “The influence is altering the map. The influence I don’t suppose could be storming the parliament.”
‘Greenland is just not on the market’
French International Minister Jean-Noël Barrot stated he spoke by cellphone Tuesday with Rubio, who dismissed the concept of a Venezuela-style operation in Greenland.
“In the US, there’s large assist for the nation belonging to NATO – a membership that, from sooner or later to the following, could be compromised by … any type of aggressiveness towards one other member of NATO,” Barrot informed France Inter radio on Wednesday.
Requested if he has a plan in case Trump does declare Greenland, Barrot stated he wouldn’t interact in “fiction diplomacy.”
Whereas most Republicans have supported Trump’s assertion, Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Thom Tillis, the Democratic and Republican co-chairs of the bipartisan Senate NATO Observer Group, have criticized Trump’s rhetoric.
“When Denmark and Greenland make it clear that Greenland is just not on the market, the US should honor its treaty obligations and respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark,” their assertion on Tuesday stated. “Any suggestion that our nation would topic a fellow NATO ally to coercion or exterior stress undermines the very ideas of self-determination that our Alliance exists to defend.”
Geir Moulson in Berlin and Mark Carlson in Brussels contributed to this report.
