RELATE: A Faculty-Prepared Redesign to Reframe SROs as Faculty Relationship Officers

A Morning That May Go Both Means . . . 

It’s first interval. A freshman slams a locker and stalks down the corridor, hood up, eyes on the ground. He’s late once more, and a trainer steps out to intercept him. A uniformed grownup turns the nook.

In many colleges, that is the inflection level. Voices rise. Guidelines are recited. The coed stiffens, the “temperature” rises, and lateness turns into a confrontation. Instantly, everybody’s day will get more durable.

Let’s think about a special state of affairs. The uniformed grownup greets the coed by title and falls into step with them. “You look stirred up. Need two minutes to reset, or do you need to stroll with me and we’ll speak?” The coed exhales. By the point they attain the classroom, the grownup has heard the fast story—missed bus, tough morning at house—and loops the trainer right into a easy plan: a late slip now and a check-in after class. There isn’t a spectacle, no elimination. The day is salvaged.

What modified on this state of affairs isn’t the coed. It’s the position and the habits of the adults within the hallway.

Why Reframe the SRO Function at All?

Faculties that put money into relationship-rich climates, train social-emotional studying abilities, use restorative responses, and apply procedural equity (or procedural justice, as our police colleagues would say) see steadier school rooms and fewer harms. Belonging is just not a bonus; it’s a core protecting issue. Clear expectations and recognition programs scale back conduct issues. Restorative conversations, performed with teaching and constancy, restore hurt and return college students to studying. Honest, clear processes invite cooperation and belief within the system. Most circumstances resolve with out harsh exclusion.

The implication is easy: relationships regulate conduct. If the security position is constructed to create relationships, security turns into simpler to construct. The true query is just not whether or not a uniformed grownup belongs in faculties; it’s what position the grownup is supposed to fill, how their work is supposed to be achieved, and what counts as success within the near- and long run. 

From Faculty Useful resource Officer to Faculty Relationship Officer

A Faculty Relationship Officer represents the subsequent era of faculty security, formed by classes gleaned from the big selection of approaches used throughout the nation. Officers chosen for this specialised position have to be chosen by means of a deliberate and considerate course of. This mannequin of faculty local weather and conduct administration requires faculty and regulation enforcement directors to recruit and assign officers who’ve demonstrated a powerful understanding of—and skill to use—community-oriented policing ideas. These ideas emphasize constructing belief by means of sturdy partnerships and leveraging these relationships to assist proactive problem-solving with a give attention to prevention and discount of hurt. Nothing in our strategy means that faculties will disregard emergencies or fail to satisfy their authorized obligations. Our redesign merely clarifies the aim, on a regular basis apply, and accountability of the position.

RELATE: The Framework That Powers Our Redesign

Our Pillars: Respect • Empathy • Listening • Accountability • Belief • Fairness

Every interprets into seen behaviors that groups can coach and measure.

R––RESPECT

College students watch how we converse, the place we stand, and whether or not we preserve our phrase. Faculty Relationship Officers use names; provide small, honest affirmations (“Glad you made it in.”); clarify choices; and comply with by means of. Respect is regular and concrete: eye stage, calm tone, clear expectations. Every of those micro-moves and micro-moments add up. The place respect and relationship are protected, correction can land with out humiliation as a result of dignity is already established.

Why it regulates conduct: Respect lowers social risk. When college students really feel revered, they will spend much less power scanning for hazard and extra power cooperating.

Potential observable indicators: A rising positive-to-corrective contact ratio; pupil survey beneficial properties on objects akin to, “Adults deal with me with respect.”

E––EMPATHY

De-escalation needs to be a longtime stance earlier than it may well grow to be a script. Faculty Relationship Officers open their conversations with curiosity moderately than assumptions and foregone conclusions—“Assist me perceive what occurred and what you want subsequent.”—and pair calm-down choices with a predictable re-entry routine. When hurt happens, they facilitate reintegration conversations that separate the individual from their conduct, and so they give attention to restore.

Why it regulates conduct: Empathy indicators security and risk. Feeling understood will increase willingness to simply accept limits and make amends.

Potential observable indicators: Time-to-calm below 10 minutes; fewer removals for defiance; pupil voice mirrored in agreements.

L––LISTENING

Voice issues, particularly earlier than choices are made. Faculty Relationship Officers use a easy “pay attention—summarize—examine” loop with college students and households and produce these stakeholder voices into advisory teams and security walk-throughs. Our Listening Loop turns into automated: “Right here’s what I heard. Right here’s what we’ll do. Right here’s after we’ll circle again.”

Why it regulates conduct: Being heard reduces reactance. When college students and households belief that their perspective can be weighed, they’re much less prone to escalate and extra prone to have interaction and problem-solve.

Potential observable indicators: Documented views; beneficial properties on “My perspective is heard”; extra early self-referrals for assist.

A––ACCOUNTABILITY

Accountability is shared. Faculty Relationship Officers personal the influence of their actions, not simply their intentions, and so they co-create restore plans with clear steps and timelines. They assist faculties publish position guardrails and publish diversion metrics in plain language in order that the varsity neighborhood can see each the position’s function and the way the position is working.

Why it regulates conduct: Clear expectations with constant follow-through construct predictability. Predictability invitations self-regulation.

Potential observable indicators: Excessive completion of restorative agreements; on-time follow-ups.

T––TRUST

Belief takes root when adults are impartial, clear, and dependable. Faculty Relationship Officers clarify the “why,” preserve confidences except security is in danger, and keep a transparent boundary between faculty self-discipline and legal enforcement. When enforcement is critical, Faculty Relationship Officers act proportionately and clarify every step.

Why it regulates conduct: Belief turns compliance into cooperation. College students cooperate not solely as a result of they need to however as a result of the system feels honest.

Potential observable indicators: Good points on equity/readability/belief objects; earlier reporting of considerations; fewer nameless complaints.

E––EQUITY

Security is for everybody. Officers and directors disaggregate outcomes, interrupt bias in realtime, develop entry to helps (e.g., translation, transportation, versatile assembly instances), and be sure that all stakeholders are included in design. Fairness is just not a parallel program or goal; it’s a mandatory ingredient of the work. 

Why it regulates conduct: Fairness is a precondition for legitimacy. When remedy is equitable, conflicts resolve sooner and with much less resistance.

Potential observable indicators: Narrowing subgroup gaps in referrals and suspensions; consultant pupil advisory teams; fairness notes in threat-assessment logs.

How Time Is Used

Most days, the Faculty Relationship Officer’s time will cluster round 4 classes of effort:

1. Relational Presence & Belonging (40–60%). Hallway “relational rounds,” classroom drop-ins, advisory circles, and household outreach grow to be the dependable rhythms of the position. That is additionally the place officers dealer future-readiness: a go to to the CTE middle, a shadow day with a neighborhood companion, a service-learning placement. The message serves as a gradual beacon: you belong right here, we wish you right here, you possibly can succeed right here, and your future is seen from right here.
   
2. Prevention (20–30%). Faculty Relationship Officers coach routines aligned with SEL core competencies, the tenets of Complete-Little one Training, et cetera, mannequin shared talent language, and assist groups design predictable de-escalation pathways that shield educational time.
3. Drawback-Fixing & Menace Evaluation (10–20%). As members of the threat-assessment staff, Faculty Relationship Officers assist to make clear danger and craft minimally intrusive security plans, monitoring helps supplied and following up about how plans are working.
4. Final-Resort Enforcement (below 10%). When authorized thresholds are met or an imminent danger is current, the Faculty Relationship Officer acts. Even then, the method is procedurally simply: steps are defined, actions are proportionate, and dignity is preserved.

What RELATE Appears to be like Like in Motion

Within the cafeteria.
Earlier than lunch, the Faculty Relationship Officer and an assistant principal stroll the house, greeting college students by title and checking in with two who clashed final week. Close to the again, the officer pauses: “We’re amassing two-minute concepts to make lunch calmer. What would you alter if you happen to held the magic wand?” College students counsel staggered strains and a clearer exit move. The following day, a easy “You mentioned / We did” notice seems by the doorways. Lunchtime improves, and college students acknowledge their fingerprints on a greater routine.

On the entrance desk.
A caregiver arrives fearful about on-line threats. As an alternative of a imprecise promise to “look into it,” the officer invitations them to a same-day seek the advice of with the threat-assessment staff. The staff listens, clarifies dangers, checks in with college students named within the report, and drafts a plan that features grownup monitoring, a restorative choice, system norms, and clear reporting channels. The household leaves with a written plan, names, and numbers—not only a case quantity.

After attendance.
Attendance slides for a pupil who used to reach daily like clockwork. The officer notices the pattern, learns that the coed is caring for a sibling earlier than faculty, and brokers a late-start elective and a two-day job-shadow. Attendance rebounds. The coed says he can “see a lane” after commencement. Security and readiness transfer collectively.

None of those situations depends on heroics. Every depends on a job deliberately designed to RELATE—and on adults working towards collectively till making these strikes is the norm.

Conserving the Work Humane and Efficient

To guard college students and employees and preserve the position anchored in prevention, districts ought to write expectations right into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), so that they outlast the management of anybody individual.

• Clear roles. Faculty Relationship Officers don’t handle routine classroom conduct, move checks, or non-criminal code violations; they don’t run attendance sweeps; and any custodial interviews comply with administrator/guardian protocols.
• Information governance. Faculty self-discipline knowledge keep in class programs. Regulation enforcement databases are used just for legally required reporting or imminent security threats. When unsure, default to instructional knowledge programs and privateness norms.
• Joint supervision & analysis. The officer solutions to each the district and the companion company. Analysis weights local weather, belonging, perceived equity, diversions, and helps.
• Fairness critiques. Every quarter, groups disaggregate referrals, removals, and police contacts by subgroup. When disparities seem, leaders determine drivers and alter practices rapidly. If the info reveal gaps, the response is educational, not punitive.
• Transparency. A plain-language position description is posted clearly so the varsity neighborhood can see what the officer does—and, simply as importantly, what the officer doesn’t do.

Our Implementation Blueprint: Begin Small, and Begin Now

Part 1 — Co-design & readiness (3–6 months)

Deliver a design staff collectively—college students (together with these with self-discipline historical past), households, classroom employees, particular providers, union reps, the officer, and neighborhood companions. Write the MOU with them. Codify RELATE expectations, the threat-assessment partnership, data-sharing limits, the least-intrusive-means precept, and a transparent grievance pathway.

Set a easy baseline: workplace referrals; suspensions/expulsions; arrests or referrals to regulation enforcement; quick pupil surveys on belonging and perceived equity; fundamental threat-assessment metrics (time to decision; proportion resolved with out exclusion). Then inform the story publicly and plainly: we’re constructing security with you.

Part 2 — Capability-building (yr 1)

Present practice-based studying (40–60 hours): adolescent growth; trauma and incapacity fundamentals; alignment to SEL and whole-child tenets; restorative conferencing; procedural-justice micro-skills; and the nuts and bolts of risk evaluation. Create teaching triads—administrator, officer, and counselor, for instance—that meet month-to-month to assessment logs, rehearse de-escalation language, and search for disproportionality. Use easy constancy instruments: a one-page RELATE look-for sheet, a brief threat-assessment guidelines, and a quick high quality rubric for restorative conversations. Mannequin two-minute hallway huddles and five-minute advisory circles. Co-teach, don’t police.

Part 3 — Steady enchancment (yr 2+)

Run 8–12-week cycles focusing on one friction at a time (e.g., tardies, lunchroom noise, hallway conflicts, classroom disruptions). Have interaction in a cycle of steady enchancment: plan, strive, research, alter. Share knowledge every quarter: diversions, referrals/removals, student-reported belonging and equity, and easy readiness proxies like attendance and on-track indicators. Share shiny spots and fixes. All through all of it, preserve college students and households on the desk.

Our One-Web page Toolkit

• 100 names, 100 greetings. Decide to 100 real constructive contacts. Observe what number of college students provoke the interplay the subsequent week.
• An advisory mini-circle. 5 minutes: “Once I’m confused at college, one factor that helps is . . . ” Shut with a thank-you spherical and one subsequent step the category can strive.
• Undertake one phrase. Use “Assist me perceive what occurred and what you want subsequent” in each battle dialog for every week, for instance. Discover what adjustments.
• Map 5 companions. With counselors, determine 5 neighborhood organizations for shadow days or micro-internships. Schedule two visits this month.
• Equity audit: one routine. Select a typical infraction (e.g., tardiness). Change the punitive sequence with educational, restorative steps and a brief re-entry script.
• Be a part of threat-assessment prep. Evaluate one case with the staff. Draft a support-first plan and examine it towards the least-intrusive-means precept. Observe up in two weeks.

Print this record. Put it on the officer’s clipboard and the principal’s desk.

Curious Questions and Clear Solutions

Is your RELATE mannequin softer on security?
No. Faculty Relationship Officers preserve full emergency authority. The shift is within the default: we select prevention, readability, and connection first as a result of they work. Enforcement stays out there when actually wanted—and is more practical inside a trusted relationship.

Will your mannequin add to lecturers’ plates?
Executed properly, it lightens them. Officers co-design routines, mannequin de-escalation, and shoulder some relational work that lecturers already do. The purpose is to guard educational time, not erode it.

What if our present officer isn’t a match?
Choice issues. Rent (or reassign) for youth-development orientation, cultural humility, and collaborative problem-solving. Then coach to RELATE-aligned observable indicators and consider towards them. Individuals rise to clear expectations and helpful suggestions.

How will we all know the RELATE Mannequin is working?
Watch near-term indicators: fewer removals, extra diversions, sooner restoration after conflicts, rising pupil rankings of equity and belonging, earlier reviews of concern, and stronger attendance and different on-track proof. Share the tales behind the numbers so the neighborhood understands the mechanisms of human change, not simply the metrics.

Concluding Ideas from Dr. Alley and Chief March

Relationship work is security work. When faculties and stations each promote an SRO position designed to assist their officer to RELATE by means of Respect, Empathy, Listening, Accountability, Belief, and Fairness, college students and different stakeholders expertise faculty as a spot that protects dignity, teaches abilities, and opens doorways. That is how we regulate conduct immediately and construct future-readiness for tomorrow. This isn’t wishful pondering. Our RELATE Framework foregrounds a set of routines any faculty can apply. This week, begin with names and greetings. Add a brief advisory circle. Rewrite one coverage for equity. Deliver college students and households into the design. Submit our RELATE Framework the place the radios cost. Then preserve going. 

Bibliography

Allen, Ok. A., Kern, M. L., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hattie, J., & Waters, L. (2018). What faculties needto learn about fostering faculty belonging: A meta-analysis. Instructional Psychology Evaluate, 30(1), 1–34. 

Cipriano, C., Strambler, M. J., Naples, L. H., et al. (2023). The state of proof for social and emotional studying: A recent meta-analysis of common school-based SEL interventions. Little one Growth, 94(5), 1181–1204. 

Cornell, D. G. (2020). Menace evaluation as a college violence prevention technique. Criminology & Public Coverage, 19(1), 235–252.  

Karlberg, M., Klang, N., & Svahn, J. (2024). Optimistic conduct assist in class: a quasi-experimental blended strategies research and a randomized managed trial [Study protocol]. BMC Psychology, 12, 521. 

Augustine, C. H., Engberg, J., Grimm, G. E., Lee, E., Wang, E. L., Christianson, Ok., & Joseph, 

A. A. (2018). Can restorative practices enhance faculty local weather and curb suspensions? An analysis of the influence of restorative practices in a mid-sized city faculty district (RR-2840). RAND Company.

Paige, J. W., & Bushway, S. D. (2024). The position and influence of faculty useful resource officers: A quick dialogue (PE-A243-2). RAND Company. 

Soderstrom, M. F. P. (2024). Formalizing and increasing faculty useful resource officer presence: Inspecting the affect on pupil arrests. Journal of Prison Justice, 94, 102236. 

Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The position of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public assist for policing. Regulation & Society Evaluate, 37(3), 513–547. 

Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Selling constructive youth growth by means of school-based social and emotional studying interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up results. Little one Growth, 88(4), 1156–1171.

Authors: Leigh Reagan Alley, Ed.D., College of Maine at Augusta

Chief (ret.) Noel C. March, M.A., College of Maine at Augusta

Leigh Reagan Alley, Ed.D. is Coordinator of Instructor Training on the College of Maine at Augusta, the place she designed and leads the primary devoted Grasp of Arts in Instructing Complete Little one Training. She is an architect of the xSELeratED Faculties Framework, serves on the Advisory Board of the Institute for Humane Training, and is the writer of award-winning Social-Emotional Studying texts for kids and educators.

Chief (ret.) Noel C. March, M.A. is Director of the Maine Neighborhood Policing Institute on the College of Maine at Augusta and the previous United States Marshal for the District of Maine. He’s a graduate of the FBI Nationwide Academy, a Fellow of the Future Policing Institute, and a former member of the IACP Board of Administrators. His work facilities on community-oriented policing and cross-sector partnerships that construct public belief.