[Pastilan] When a congressman’s ‘thought crime’ goes public

How splendidly does Quezon Metropolis Consultant Jesus “Bong” Suntay embody the persistent, unrepentant absurdity of lots of our male politicians. He reveals a mixture of old style prudishness and daring entitlement, performing as if merely imagining one thing improper, and saying it out loud for everybody to listen to, places him above criticism.

The philosophical statement that “thought crimes” are, in reality, non-crimes, is past dispute. I agree – Suntay can’t be dropped at courtroom for the issues he imagines fantasizing about and does inside the toilet. Everybody has ideas they wouldn’t say out loud, from small anger to non-public fantasies. That’s regular. That’s human.

However regular ideas don’t give anybody the license to parade probably the most intimate and grotesque imaginings in public fora, notably not in Congress, or any chamber of governance for that matter, the place phrases carry the load of institutional authority.

Play Video

I get his level: Vice President Sara Duterte didn’t commit against the law by fantasizing concerning the macabre act of decapitating the President. She took to social media to disclose that she had made an murderer promise to her that the primary couple can be killed if something untoward occurred to her. Suntay appears to mistake non-consummation for harmlessness as if it weren’t a dying menace, which, final time I checked, is punishable beneath our legal guidelines.

Suntay’s mistake lay not within the level he sought to hammer house, however in his alternative of analogy. To weaponize personal, salacious fantasies as a public assertion, particularly in Congress, is a hanging instance of what the French name bêtise, a form of absurd, inconsiderate, and socially tone-deaf stupidity.

Unwritten code

Civilization, as fragile as it’s, relies upon upon the cautious administration of speech and restraint of thought. To flout this unwritten code in entrance of colleagues, and worse, on the expense of a lady solely unconnected to the proceedings, is the very definition of bastos. A congressman might declare immunity from authorized censure, but ethics is neither reducible to legality nor to mere absence of crime.

Suntay’s defensive insistence that there was nothing unlawful or immoral about what he mentioned solely confirmed the deeper downside. Morality is just not confined to codified legislation. It encompasses decency, dignity, and respect for others, requirements that demand recognition even within the absence of authorized enforcement. But this congressman from Quezon Metropolis handled these obligations with the informal irreverence of a kid pulling down a sandcastle.

Play Video

Had he wished to make some extent, analogies grounded in private lapses – maybe the fantasy to divert public funds meant for infrastructure initiatives to his vault – would have been related, trustworthy, and self-reflective. 

Why not say, “I imagined diverting to my pocket greater than half of the funds allotted for a flood management venture in Quezon Metropolis, however – cross my coronary heart and hope to die – I didn’t act on it, and due to this fact no crime was dedicated”? 

Many within the viewers would in all probability have laughed themselves foolish, imagining that Suntay was mendacity by means of his tooth, but, naturally, that – that they merely imagined it – isn’t any crime.

Or, he might need mentioned: “I imagined a vote-buying scheme in Quezon Metropolis, the place every voter can be requested to usher in eight extra in change for money. Naturally, I didn’t act on it, so no legislation was damaged.” Maybe, it will have been far much less offensive to Curtis than turning the harmless bystander into the item of his personal fantasy that was made public. 

Such a alternative displays a profound misunderstanding of the essential rules of respect, consent, and moral accountability. Suntay’s actions expose a deeper dysfunction inside a authorities establishment nonetheless dominated by what Rappler reporter Dwight de Leon calls a boys’ membership mentality – insensitive to public scrutiny, detached to moral norms, and missing mechanisms for significant self-regulation.

Weak ethics

This episode doesn’t appear to be an remoted lapse of judgment, however reasonably as a symptom of systemic weak spot, during which private indulgence is tolerated on the expense {of professional} accountability and the general public’s belief.

Empowering girls shouldn’t be ceremonial. It requires motion, restraint, and a refusal to deal with public workplace as a confessional for puerile sexual fantasies. That Suntay can’t comprehend this, and certainly questions which phrase was “offensive,” signifies a continual deficit of judgment endemic to some quarters of our legislature. 

Phrases matter, notably when wielded by these entrusted with shaping nationwide discourse and coverage. An off-the-cuff discount of a lady to a sexual object communicates the persistent, systemic contempt for ladies that continues to poison establishments meant to serve the general public.

There isn’t a such factor as a “thought crime” – however there may be such a factor as bastos. There isn’t a legislation damaged when sexual fantasies are saved within the thoughts, however there’s something fairly not proper when misogyny is paraded with the arrogance of a person who in all probability thinks the world owes him indulgence. 

Quezon Metropolis’s 4th District is represented by somebody whose creativeness is vivid, but whose moral compass is embarrassingly weak. The nation deserves higher, girls deserve respect, and Congress deserves a mirror. 

If politicians like Suntay preserve saying out loud the issues they need to simply think about privately, Congress will appear to be the world’s most dysfunctional group-therapy session, and the remainder of the nation will get front-row seats because it watches all this dwell. – Rappler.com