President Trump’s Justice Division charged former FBI Director James Comey on Thursday with mendacity to Congress, an unprecedented step in opposition to a longtime Trump foe that revisits controversies over the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe from practically a decade in the past.
A grand jury in Northern Virginia voted to indict Comey on two counts: making a false assertion to Congress and obstructing a congressional continuing. In an uncommon transfer, the grand jury voted in opposition to indicting him on a further cost of creating a false assertion.
The felony expenses revolve round a Senate listening to in September 2020, when lawmakers grilled Comey — who was fired by Mr. Trump three years earlier — about how he dealt with the FBI’s 2016 investigations into pro-Trump election meddling by Russia and Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal e mail server. Each election-year probes have drawn Mr. Trump’s ire for years.
The five-year statute of limitations for expenses out of that listening to would have expired subsequent week.
Comey asserted in an Instagram video that he’s harmless.
In a assertion, Legal professional Common Pam Bondi mentioned the indictment “displays this Division of Justice’s dedication to holding those that abuse positions of energy accountable for deceptive the American folks.”
Depend 1: Comey accused of mendacity about media leaks
The primary rely in opposition to Comey that was accepted by the grand jury accuses him of breaking a federal legislation that makes it a criminal offense to make “any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent assertion or illustration” to a federal physique, together with Congress.
The cost hinges on a combative back-and-forth between the previous FBI director and Republican Sen.Ted Cruz of Texas through the Sept. 30, 2020, Senate listening to.
Within the listening to, Cruz pressed Comey on whether or not he had ever licensed one other FBI staffer to function an nameless supply in any media experiences concerning the bureau’s 2016 investigations involving Mr. Trump and Hillary Clinton.
Comey had answered no to an identical query throughout one other Senate listening to in 2017. However Cruz mentioned within the 2020 questioning that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe — one other Trump foe — has “publicly and repeatedly said that he leaked info to the Wall Road Journal and that you simply had been immediately conscious of it and that you simply immediately licensed it,” referring to an article about an FBI investigation into the Clinton Basis.
“Now, what Mr. McCabe is saying and what you testified to this committee can not each be true. One or the opposite is fake,” the senator mentioned to Comey. “Who’s telling the reality?”
“I can solely communicate to my testimony. I stand by the testimony,” replied Comey.
Thursday’s indictment alleges that this assertion is fake as a result of Comey “then and there knew, he actually had licensed [an unnamed person] to function an nameless supply in information experiences relating to an FBI investigation.”
A 2018 report by the Justice Division inspector normal’s workplace says Comey and McCabe mentioned the Wall Road Journal article after it got here out, however gave investigators competing tales about their assembly. Comey informed the watchdog that McCabe “led him to imagine” that McCabe hadn’t licensed the discharge of any info to the Journal. However McCabe mentioned he informed Comey a day after the article was revealed that he’d accepted the discharge himself, and Comey replied that it was a good suggestion.
The report says “the overwhelming weight of that proof supported Comey’s model of the dialog,” and McCabe “lacked candor” in his dialog with Comey.
McCabe later informed “60 Minutes” he didn’t deliberately mislead the inspector normal.
McCabe was fired in 2018, days earlier than he was set to retire.
Depend 2: Obstructing a congressional continuing
Comey was additionally indicted Thursday for allegedly making an attempt to “affect, hinder and impede” an investigation by the Senate Judiciary Committee by “making false and deceptive statements.” The indictment doesn’t say what alleged false assertion led to the obstruction cost.
Grand jury rejects a cost in opposition to Comey
A majority of the Alexandria, Virginia-based grand jury that reviewed the Comey matter voted to not cost him with one of many three counts introduced by prosecutors, in response to a kind that was signed by the grand jury’s foreperson and filed in court docket Thursday.
To ensure that federal prosecutors to criminally indict anyone, they should persuade most members of a 23-person grand jury that they’ve “possible trigger” to imagine a criminal offense was dedicated — a a lot decrease bar than the one wanted to convict anyone.
It’s totally uncommon for grand juries to say no an indictment. Within the 2016 fiscal yr, federal prosecutors declined to deliver expenses in opposition to anyone as a result of the grand jury did not return an indictment solely six occasions, out of greater than 150,000 suspects who had been investigated that yr, in response to a Justice Division report.
In current months, nonetheless, grand juries in Washington, D.C., have rejected a number of requests for indictments by the Justice Division, together with a potential felony cost in opposition to an individual who was accused of throwing a sandwich at a federal agent. Former federal prosecutor Brendan Ballou informed CBS Information earlier this month that pattern “means that the administration has completely destroyed its credibility with jurors.”
The unsuccessful rely in opposition to Comey would have accused him of illegally making false statements to Congress throughout a line of questioning by Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina in September 2020.
Graham had requested Comey if he remembered getting a lead from the intelligence group in September 2016 that alleged Hillary Clinton’s marketing campaign “was going to create a scandal relating to Trump and Russia” as a way to distract from her use of a personal e mail server.
Comey replied: “That does not ring a bell” — which the Justice Division known as false.
The allegation about Clinton’s marketing campaign first surfaced in 2020, when it was declassified by Mr. Trump’s Director of Nationwide Intelligence John Ratcliffe. Clinton marketing campaign officers denied the accusation to Justice Division particular counsel John Durham, a Trump-era prosecutor tasked with reviewing the Russia probe. However Durham mentioned in a 2023 report that FBI investigators wanting into potential Trump-Russia ties ought to’ve paid extra consideration to the claims.
