Extra Individuals now describe ICE’s operations as too robust when stopping and detaining folks, and there is a rising view that President Trump’s deportation program is concentrating on extra folks than simply harmful criminals.
In the meantime, Republicans overwhelmingly really feel the protesters have gone too far.
Within the wake of occasions in Minneapolis, total help for the deportation program — which has roughly divided the nation for months — has dipped even because it continues to attract sturdy backing from Republicans and particularly sturdy backing from MAGA.
And in sum, the general public expresses a distinction between how they see the objectives of the deportation program and the way it’s being carried out.
There are shifting perceptions of who’s being focused by this system. Individuals are more and more prone to say the administration is not prioritizing harmful criminals, and most assume the administration is making an attempt to deport extra folks than they thought it might.
So, as Individuals look total, a slight majority really feel ICE is making the communities the place it’s conducting operations much less protected, many greater than really feel it is bettering security.
Over the course of the time period, total approval of the deportation program began web positively, grew to become extra divided over the summer season, after which hovered close to that division for months. Within the wake of occasions in Minneapolis, it dropped to its lowest total mark of the time period.
Extra folks like what they consider this system’s objectives are than just like the strategy being taken. The previous is combined, whereas the latter is adverse.
Total, Mr. Trump’s approval on dealing with immigration has additionally ticked right down to its lowest level of his second time period, although it continues to outpace his approval on the economic system and inflation.
Views on the taking pictures of Renee Good by an ICE agent in Minneapolis hew intently to celebration traces. Republicans are likely to name it justified, whereas Democrats and independents say it was not. Most additionally say that they do not consider the administration’s response to it has been truthful.
Non-MAGA Republicans are much less inclined than MAGA to name the taking pictures justified.
Fascinated about what ought to be subsequent for ICE, the current occasions in Minneapolis seem to have at the very least partially bolstered preexisting views concerning the deportation program. Democrats say current occasions imply ICE operations within the U.S. ought to be decreased, although they already opposed this system. Republicans both say it means operations ought to be elevated or stored the identical; they’ve lengthy favored this system.
Trying abroad to Greenland and Iran
Trying abroad, with widespread opposition to the prospect of navy motion in Greenland or Iran, a majority of Individuals seem pessimistic about what Mr. Trump’s insurance policies would possibly deliver by way of peace and stability in 2026.
Most Individuals assume the U.S. does have strategic pursuits in Iran, however they’re extra divided on whether or not or not it has ethical tasks there.
Most do not assume the U.S. has efficient plans for navy motion there, and two-thirds really feel it might be an extended and expensive involvement. These sentiments are intently linked to opposition to the thought of drive.
The thought of utilizing navy drive to take Greenland faces overwhelming opposition throughout celebration traces, together with most MAGA Republicans, who say they might disapprove. For context, they’ve largely backed the president after he has taken navy actions, together with in Venezuela and the strikes on Iran’s nuclear services final 12 months.
Whether or not they help navy motion in Greenland and Iran or not, most Republicans do assume Mr. Trump has made the U.S. place on the earth stronger.
What do Individuals assume would occur if the U.S. took Greenland by drive?
Some assume taking Greenland would represent a present of drive to Russia and China, and simply over half assume it might present entry to wanted pure assets. However massive majorities additionally assume it might trigger the U.S. to depart the NATO alliance and create instability on the earth.
Views concerning the latter two implications are very intently related to opposition to the thought.
This CBS Information/YouGov survey was performed with a nationally consultant pattern of two,523 U.S. adults interviewed between January 14-16, 2026. The pattern was weighted to be consultant of adults nationwide in response to gender, age, race, and schooling, primarily based on the U.S. Census American Neighborhood Survey and Present Inhabitants Survey, in addition to 2024 presidential vote. The margin of error is ±2.3 factors.
















