[ad_1]
Congress is investigating reviews that Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered a second strike on survivors of a drug-boat assault, placing the legality of the current U.S. navy marketing campaign underneath scrutiny.
MILES PARKS, HOST:
Since early September, the U.S. navy has carried out greater than 20 strikes on what they are saying are drug boats in worldwide waters, killing greater than 80 folks. Now, the Home and Senate Armed Providers Committees say they need extra solutions on these lethal strikes. That oversight comes within the wake of recent reporting that Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth personally ordered strikes, together with a second strike on a ship that had survivors on it, clinging for all times. With extra on this reporting and the congressional probe, let’s usher in NPR’s Luke Garrett, who joins me right here in studio. Hello, Luke.
LUKE GARRETT, BYLINE: Hey, Miles.
PARKS: So Secretary Hegseth has been posting movies of those lethal strikes on social media. What’s new right here?
GARRETT: That is proper. By now, we’re used to unclassified navy footage of slender motorboats being obliterated at sea. However what’s new right here is the chain of command and the precise orders given by Secretary Hegseth. A supply acquainted however not approved to talk publicly tells NPR’s Tom Bowman that Hegseth ordered the primary strike on an alleged drug boat within the Caribbean on September 2 after which a follow-up strike that killed all survivors on board. The Washington Submit first reported this story that’s elevating severe questions in regards to the legality of those strikes and whether or not they’re battle crimes. The Pentagon has denied these reviews, and Hegseth himself posted on X that these strikes are, quote, “lawful underneath each U.S. and worldwide regulation.”
PARKS: OK. So regardless of these denials from the Pentagon, we’re nonetheless seeing members of Congress demanding solutions. What precisely do they wish to know?
GARRETT: In brief, to determine the veracity of those reviews on Hegseth, says Nebraska Consultant Don Bacon. The Republican sits on the Home Armed Providers Committee and tells ABC Information…
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
DON BACON: We must always get to the reality. I do not assume he could be silly sufficient to make this determination to say, kill all people, kill the survivors, ‘trigger that is a transparent violation of the regulation of battle.
GARRETT: And over on the Senate Armed Service Committee, Democrat Mark Kelly of Arizona says he hopes these reviews are simply not true, but when they’re, he tells CNN…
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
MARK KELLY: I’ve acquired severe issues about anyone in that, you realize, chain of command stepping over a line that they need to by no means step over.
GARRETT: And in a uncommon joint assertion, committee chair Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi and rating member Jack Reed of Rhode Island wrote, quote, “we might be conducting vigorous oversight to find out the info.”
PARKS: OK. That is what we’re listening to from Congress. What are we listening to from the Trump administration?
GARRETT: Proper. So Legal professional Common Pam Bondi defended the navy marketing campaign in opposition to these alleged drug boats. Right here she is on Fox Information.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PAM BONDI: We’re dedicated to taking out these narco-terrorists. President Trump is. Marco Rubio is, our complete administration.
GARRETT: And the administration does have allies in Congress. Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin, a Republican on the Armed Providers Committee, defended Hegseth on CNN.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
MARKWAYNE MULLIN: These people do not care in regards to the lives of our associates and households. Why can we care if we take them out in worldwide water? It’s a battle as a result of they’ve declared battle on our streets.
GARRETT: After which Mullin criticized and even questioned the nameless sources who say Hegseth ordered a strike on survivors, and he pointed to different strikes the place the survivors had been despatched again to their nation of origin.
PARKS: How massive of a deal are these congressional investigations?
GARRETT: So legally, Congress does have actual highly effective levers and instruments at their disposal. You recognize, they will name hearings. They will ask for paperwork, and even, you realize, they’ve the subpoena energy. However we’ll have to attend and see how aggressive these inquiries are. However politically, it is vital as a result of, you realize, GOP-led committees have not likely probed the Trump administration but, so we’ll see what occurs right here.
PARKS: Luke, thanks a lot for being right here.
GARRETT: You wager.
PARKS: NPR’s Luke Garrett.
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts could range. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.
[ad_2]
