The Justice Division on Friday introduced it’s charging 30 extra individuals for his or her roles in a January anti-ICE protest at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, in a prison civil rights case that has additionally ensnared journalist and former CNN anchor Don Lemon.
The division moved to unseal the superseding indictment within the U.S. District Court docket for the District of Minnesota. Lawyer Common Pam Bondi in an announcement on X mentioned that 25 of the 30 have been arrested, with extra to come back.
The unique 9 defendants within the case, together with Lemon and one other fellow journalist, have all pleaded not responsible.
The brand new model of the indictment doesn’t add any extra prison fees.
It accuses all 39 individuals of violating two civil rights legal guidelines. One is a misdemeanor offense within the FACE Act, which prohibits individuals from intimidating or interfering with individuals exercising their constitutional freedom to follow faith. The opposite is a felony cost of conspiring to intrude with people’ spiritual rights.
Former Justice Division civil rights attorneys beforehand informed CBS Information they see weak spot within the case and predict it may very well be dismissed.
That is as a result of the part within the FACE Act criminalizing interference at homes of worship basically misstates the rights individuals have underneath the First Modification.
The First Modification protects people’ spiritual freedom from authorities interference. Nevertheless it doesn’t defend them from interference by non-public people, just like the protesters and journalists charged within the indictment, they are saying.
Congress handed the FACE Act in 1994 to deal with rising issues about threats and intimidation that ladies have been going through at reproductive well being clinics.
Since then, it has solely been utilized by the Justice Division to prosecute individuals accused of interfering with entry to medical care at such clinics — and never at homes of worship — as a result of courts have discovered that interfering with entry to a reproductive well being clinic impacts interstate commerce.
Earlier than acquiring the primary indictment within the case, the Justice Division tried to cost a number of the defendants with a prison grievance. However a Justice of the Peace decide rejected 5 of the arrest warrants, together with these in opposition to the journalists, for an absence of possible trigger. That very same decide additionally rejected the FACE Act cost in opposition to a number of different defendants on the identical grounds.
Lemon and Georgia Fort, the opposite journalist charged within the case, have requested the court docket to contemplate disclosing the grand jury transcripts, that are hardly ever made public attributable to grand jury secrecy guidelines.
“Grand jury proceedings are presumed common and, with some exceptions, ordinarily protected against outdoors scrutiny. However the authorities has squandered that presumption right here. Its conduct has been extremely uncommon, nakedly political, and inconsistent with follow on this District,” they wrote.
“A number of judges thought of the federal government’s ‘proof’ in opposition to Don Lemon and Georgia Fort and declined fees. Undeterred, the federal government took the prosecution President Trump demanded to a grand jury and obtained an indictment,” Lemon and Fort argued. “These circumstances—by no means earlier than seen on this District, and for good motive—elevate severe issues concerning the authorities’s presentation to the grand jury.”
