Final 12 months, when Utah lawmakers handed the nation’s first statewide ban on neighborhood water fluoridation, they included a provision making it simpler for individuals to get fluoride dietary supplements with out having to go to a dental supplier.
This could make fluoride obtainable via particular person selection, relatively than “mass public dosing,” as a Utah Home of Representatives webpage put it — a part of the rising rhetoric of skepticism that’s led to rollbacks of water fluoridation, a confirmed methodology to cut back tooth decay.
“It’s what I prefer to seek advice from because the win-win, proper?” Speaker Mike Schultz mentioned on a June episode of the “Home Guidelines” podcast from the Utah Home. “People who need fluoride can now get fluoride simpler, and people who don’t need fluoride of their consuming water don’t must have that.”
However whilst critics level to fluoride dietary supplements as a substitute — together with fluoride toothpaste, rinses and varnishes — many are creating boundaries to those similar merchandise.
Underneath U.S. Well being and Human Companies Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s oversight, the Meals and Drug Administration mentioned it issued notices to 4 companies about their ingestible fluoride dietary supplements for youngsters and likewise put out new steerage for well being professionals.
In Texas, Lawyer Basic Ken Paxton launched investigations into two giant corporations over their advertising and marketing of fluoride toothpaste to folks and kids.
And adjustments to Medicaid in President Donald Trump’s so-called One Massive Lovely Invoice Act threaten to make it more durable than it already is for probably the most weak individuals to entry any oral well being care in any respect, not to mention fluoride therapies at a dentist’s workplace.
Greater than something, consultants say, alarmist language from high-profile officers is trickling all the way down to the general public, main extra individuals to query whether or not any type of fluoride — in consuming water or in different therapies — is a good suggestion.
Scott Tomar, a professor and affiliate dean on the College of Illinois Chicago School of Dentistry, is amongst those that have watched with dismay because the dialog about fluoride has been affected by arguments more likely to scare individuals.
“I’m sure that the online results of all of that is going to be a better reluctance on the a part of mother and father and suppliers to prescribe fluoride dietary supplements,” Tomar mentioned.
Low, constant publicity to fluoride is extensively credited for dramatic declines in decaying enamel. However long-simmering skepticism about its use gained extra affect in recent times, particularly with Kennedy’s credibility and affect because the nation’s chief well being officer.
“The proof towards fluoride is overwhelming,” he mentioned as he stood alongside Utah lawmakers at a press convention in Salt Lake Metropolis final April.
Regardless that the science to assist his conclusions is restricted, he claimed that fluoride “causes IQ loss, profound IQ loss,” and he linked water fluoridation to ADHD, hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis, and kidney and liver points.
Lee Zeldin, who leads the Environmental Safety Company, spoke on the Utah occasion, too, crediting Kennedy for serving to to spur the company’s evaluate of its normal for fluoride in consuming water. An EPA spokesperson, in a press release to ProPublica, mentioned that the company’s “subsequent evaluation of latest scientific data on potential well being dangers of fluoride in consuming water was not due till 2030, however this company is transferring at Trump Pace.”
In the meantime, the FDA is partnering with different federal businesses to develop what it known as “a fluoride analysis agenda.” And, as a part of a collection of drastic cutbacks final spring, the Division of Oral Well being on the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention was eradicated.
In a press release emailed to ProPublica, an HHS spokesperson argued that fluoride’s “predominant profit to enamel comes from topical contact with the surface of the enamel, not from ingestion. There isn’t a want, due to this fact, to ingest fluoride.”
Fluoride’s opponents cite a hotly debated “state of the science” report from the Nationwide Toxicology Program in 2024, saying that it exhibits an affiliation between fluoride publicity and a lowered IQ in kids.
However these findings will not be extensively embraced due to the evaluate’s limitations. It analyzed research carried out exterior the U.S., with totally different water situations, and involving fluoride ranges at greater than twice the usual for consuming water right here. The report itself states, in daring kind, that it doesn’t handle “whether or not the only real publicity to fluoride added to consuming water” on the beneficial degree in america and Canada “is related to a measurable impact on IQ.”
On this environment, as ProPublica has reported, there’s been widespread wavering on water fluoridation, even in Michigan, the place the therapy debuted greater than 80 years in the past.
Florida joined Utah in banning fluoridation statewide. Payments to do the identical had been launched in not less than 19 different states final 12 months, and that momentum is carrying ahead, with statewide bans not too long ago proposed in Arizona and South Carolina. In the meantime, native debates over fluoridation are turning raucous.
Utah’s dental professionals are involved about tips on how to stave off an anticipated hit to oral well being, as different communities skilled once they reduce off fluoridation.
“We get heartburn over the scenario,” mentioned James Bekker, a pediatric dentist and previous president of the Utah Dental Affiliation.
Bekker and others are piecing collectively methods to supply different types of fluoride therapy to Utahns. However he’s apprehensive, he mentioned, about “all these vulnerable, weak kids in underserved populations that don’t have a selection and don’t have a voice, however they’re going to undergo.”
Shortly after Utah banned fluoridation, the FDA took purpose on the sort of dietary supplements that lawmakers had introduced as a key various. The company introduced that it was working to take away sure ingestible fluoride merchandise for youngsters from the market. Its press launch described associations with adjustments to the intestine microbiome, thyroid issues, weight achieve “and probably decreased IQ.”
Greater than 4,600 public feedback poured into the FDA, together with many from individuals apprehensive about dropping entry to dietary supplements whereas concurrently dropping water fluoridation.
“Now that fluoride has been faraway from a lot of Utah’s water, it’s crucial to supply supplementation via different means,” one orthodontist wrote. A dentist in South Florida criticized the scare ways and dangerous science main states like hers to ban fluoridation and mentioned that prescribing fluoride drops and lozenges is likely one of the few options for pediatric sufferers.
On Oct. 31, the FDA introduced efforts to “prohibit the sale of unapproved ingestible fluoride prescription drug merchandise for youngsters.” The company mentioned it despatched notices to 4 corporations about advertising and marketing the dietary supplements for youngsters beneath 3 and older kids with average or low threat for tooth decay. It additionally mentioned it issued letters to well being care professionals “warning concerning the dangers related to these merchandise.”
Regardless that the FDA landed in need of a ban, Stuart Cooper, government director of the Fluoride Motion Community, known as the company’s shift a “main victory.” He mentioned he believes it’s simply the beginning of federal motion to restrict using fluoride merchandise that FAN has lengthy campaigned towards.
Fluoride dietary supplements, which emerged within the Forties alongside water fluoridation, by no means went via an FDA evaluate. A decade in the past, Cooper mentioned, FAN submitted a residents petition that known as for the company to drag ingestible fluoride dietary supplements from the market. “What we’re seeing is that come to fruition,” he mentioned, “as a result of we lastly have FDA workers who had been prepared to take a look at the problem.”
The FDA’s stance on dietary supplements is now at odds with a number of well being organizations, together with the American Dental Affiliation, the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry and the American Academy of Pediatrics. A number of of them collectively assist a graduated fluoride supplementation schedule that begins at six months for high-risk kids.
Johnny Johnson, a retired pediatric dentist in Florida, questions the FDA’s threat parameters. “In case you don’t have fluoride at applicable ranges in your water, by definition, you’re at excessive threat” of tooth decay, mentioned Johnson, who heads the nonprofit American Fluoridation Society.
The FDA’s letter to well being professionals recommends topical fluoride as a substitute, reminiscent of toothpaste. However even that methodology faces scrutiny. The Texas legal professional common’s workplace launched investigations into Colgate-Palmolive and Procter & Gamble, which promote Colgate and Crest fluoride toothpastes.
Their advertising and marketing to folks and kids is “deceptive, misleading and harmful,” Paxton’s workplace mentioned in a press launch. Referencing the NTP report on fluoridation, the discharge mentioned the investigation got here “amid a rising physique of scientific proof demonstrating that extreme fluoride publicity shouldn’t be secure for youngsters.”
In September, Paxton’s workplace introduced a “historic settlement” with Colgate-Palmolive. When its packaging and promotional materials for youngsters’s fluoride toothpaste exhibits the paste on a brush, the corporate will show a pea-sized quantity, relatively than the standard swirl. This month, Paxton’s workplace reported an identical settlement with Procter & Gamble.
A consultant from Colgate-Palmolive mentioned in a press release to ProPubica that Paxton’s press launch acknowledged that “we already present instructions on our packaging that complies with U.S. FDA necessities for a way our youngsters’s fluoride toothpastes ought to be used.” Procter & Gamble mentioned in a press release that “the Texas Lawyer Basic acknowledged within the settlement that our merchandise adjust to all legal guidelines and rules concerning instructions to be used.”
One other software for fluoride therapy is varnish utilized throughout a dental checkup, which can be supplied at free or diminished price via insurance coverage applications. However even with well being protection, there are boundaries that always make it troublesome to see the dentists and pediatricians offering such therapy. Latest analysis discovered that insurance coverage denials for fluoride varnish purposes can add one other layer of complication for sufferers and suppliers.
Supplemental fluoride therapies are restricted, in contrast with the effectiveness, attain and value of fluoride in consuming water, mentioned Johnson, the retired pediatric dentist, however “it’s the solely choice that now we have in Florida and in Utah.”
“Nothing replaces fluoridated water,” he added. “Nothing comes shut.”

