Officers on the U.S. Forest Service knew gear worn by wildland firefighters contained doubtlessly harmful “perpetually chemical compounds” years earlier than the company publicly acknowledged the difficulty, in line with inner correspondence obtained by ProPublica.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, often known as PFAS, have been linked to adverse well being impacts, together with sure cancers and delayed improvement in kids. For years, PFAS chemical compounds had been generally used to deal with the heavy gear worn by municipal firefighters to assist it repel water and oil.
Federal companies have stated little about whether or not the compounds had been additionally discovered within the lighter heat-resistant clothes worn by wildland firefighters. In February 2024, when ProPublica was reporting on the risks of wildland firefighting — together with the danger of most cancers — the information group requested each the Forest Service and the Division of the Inside if federal wildland firefighting gear contained PFAS. Each companies gave practically equivalent solutions, writing that they didn’t have “particular measured focus information exhibiting that PFAS is contained in protecting clothes and equipment.”
However electronic mail correspondence obtained by ProPublica exhibits that authorities officers had been alerted to the presence of PFAS in pants utilized by wildland firefighters as early as 2021. In April 2022, a senior Forest Service official requested colleagues if they’d an obligation to inform firefighters that PFAS had been discovered of their gear.
Based on the emails, the company determined to not instantly share the data, as an alternative ready for the outcomes of a research into whether or not PFAS could be absorbed by means of the pores and skin.
The emails had been launched final week in response to a Freedom of Data Act request filed in 2022 by George Broyles, a former Forest Service worker who for years studied smoke publicity amongst firefighters, and who has repeatedly raised issues concerning the company’s reluctance to acknowledge most cancers amongst its workforce. “They only obfuscate,” stated Broyles. “It’s only a continuation of the identical factor: ‘We’re going to stay our heads within the sand and hope that no one notices.’”
The Forest Service declined to reply questions concerning the data, PFAS chemical compounds in its gear, and firefighter well being. In 2024, the company stated in an announcement to ProPublica, “The Forest Service is deeply dedicated to not solely understanding occupational dangers to staff however mitigating these dangers.”
The Division of the Inside didn’t reply questions on PFAS.
By 2021, public consciousness of the ubiquity and dangers of PFAS was rising. At first of that yr, Congress ordered the Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Expertise, a subagency of the Division of Commerce, to seek out out if firefighting gear contained PFAS. Researchers from the company started amassing hoods and gloves worn by municipal firefighters — who sort out constructing fires — in addition to numerous samples of wildland firefighting gear.
In April, in line with the paperwork, a Forest Service gear specialist emailed certainly one of its suppliers, TenCate, which produces cloth utilized in wildland firefighting gear. On the time, the corporate’s “Advance” cloth, a Kevlar mix utilized in some pants, was handled with a ending product known as Shelltite. “Query,” requested the Forest Service specialist. “Does the Shelltite end on the Advance cloth have any PFAS presence?”
A TenCate supervisor rapidly responded by attaching a doc confirming that certainly one of its finishes contained a type of PFAS that had been utilized to repel hydrocarbons and gasoline. The supervisor additionally stated that TenCate was “within the closing phases of growing” a end with out the compound.
TenCate didn’t reply to repeated requests for remark from ProPublica.
PFAS is a broad class of chemical compounds. Based on emails despatched from TenCate to the Forest Service, the corporate’s end used a type of PFAS with six or fewer fluorinated carbon atoms. Based on consultants, these “short-chain” PFAS chemical compounds are much less dangerous than different ones, however some can linger within the surroundings for years and within the human physique for months. Their full impression on human well being shouldn’t be recognized.
All firefighters have considerably larger most cancers dangers than the overall inhabitants, however much less is known concerning the well being of wildland firefighters than of their counterparts who battle blazes in buildings and different buildings. That is largely the fault of the federal government: As ProPublica has reported, the Forest Service has recognized of carcinogenic components in wildfire smoke for many years however the authorities dragged its heels in learning the impacts on wildland firefighters. Researchers have discovered elevated ranges of some PFAS within the blood of structural firefighters, however much less is thought about these chemical compounds of their wildland friends.
Whereas structural firefighting departments typically require clothes that repel oil and water, consultants say it’s not all the time essential for wildland firefighters, who typically put on the identical gear for weeks in distant places.
“From the wildland firefighting perspective, I don’t see any purpose to have the PFAS therapies of their gear. They don’t really want the oil repellency,” stated Bryan Ormond, an affiliate professor of textile engineering, chemistry and science at North Carolina State College, in an electronic mail. “It could be a safer choice to not have the PFAS remedy.”
Based on a former fireplace service official with direct data of the dynamic, the presence of PFAS in pants was a subject of debate round 2021 by a danger administration committee made up of senior officers from a number of companies, together with the Forest Service and the Division of the Inside. The official stated that committee members needed to know: “Is it a giant deal, little deal, or no deal?”
In April 2022, a full yr after TenCate advised the Forest Service concerning the PFAS remedy used on its cloth, a senior company official named David Haston raised the difficulty once more. An assistant director of operations on the Forest Service on the time, Haston emailed colleagues asking whether or not TenCate’s cloth was “nonetheless coming with PFAS within the end? Can Tencate inform us whether or not or not that is hazardous to people who put on these clothes? Do we now have an obligation to inform staff?”
The e-mail was forwarded to a Forest Service gear specialist named David Maclay-Schulte who stated he’d requested the corporate if its PFAS-free cloth was prepared. “They stated they’ll look into it and get again to me,” wrote the specialist. “I’m hopeful it’s sooner quite than later.”
5 months later, in September, Maclay-Schulte wrote to Forest Service officers that he nonetheless hadn’t heard again from TenCate. Within the electronic mail, Maclay-Schulte stated he would contact the corporate once more, however added that the Forest Service had determined to attend till the Nationwide Institute for Occupational Security and Well being had accomplished research, together with one about whether or not PFAS could be absorbed by means of pores and skin, “earlier than any selections could be made.” In the identical electronic mail, he requested colleagues whether or not he ought to reply to questions on PFAS that Broyles had requested on behalf of a labor advocacy group known as Grassroots Wildland Firefighters. The opposite officers all agreed that they’d not instantly inform Grassroots concerning the PFAS. “They should ship the FS an official request asking for this data,” wrote a physiologist for the company.
Based on a number of wildland firefighters and authorities officers conversant in contracting and buying, the Forest Service by no means advised rank-and-file wildland firefighters that their pants may comprise PFAS.
“To me it demonstrates that managers excessive up within the company over a number of years have by no means actually prioritized the well being and well-being of the particular firefighters,” stated Riva Duncan, the president of Grassroots and a former Forest Service fireplace chief. Duncan famous that many wildland firefighters put on their pants even within the offseason. “They’ve recognized about this. They’ve recognized about different threats to well being and well-being but they’ve chosen to not be proactive and share the data with staff. It appears it’s solely after they’re compelled to offer data that we discover out about it.”
Up to now few years, beneath strain from labor teams and lawmakers, the federal authorities has begun to acknowledge most cancers within the workforce, and the Forest Service final yr made masks out there to wildland firefighters in response to reporting from The New York Occasions. However a full accounting of the dangers remains to be not out there; the federal government’s preparedness information for incoming wildland firefighters, produced in 2022, makes no point out of most cancers. When ProPublica requested the Division of the Inside if it deliberate to replace the information, a spokesperson directed the information group to a weblog submit about analysis into office hazards that doesn’t point out most cancers.
In January 2023, nearly two years after the Forest Service discovered of the PFAS therapies, TenCate lastly responded to Maclay-Schulte. “To the most effective of our data sporting ADVANCE with Shelltite or Supershelltite has not triggered deleterious well being impacts,” wrote a senior director on the firm. However the firm additionally knowledgeable the company that it was now producing its PFAS-free end for the pant cloth.
It’s unclear if the federal government started buying pants with the brand new end or if it continued to buy the pants with PFAS.
In 2024, NIST launched the research of PFAS in firefighting gear that Congress had mandated in 2021. The research discovered that some wildland firefighting gear contained PFAS. Most of it had modest quantities of the chemical compounds. However, NIST wrote, in a abstract of the research, “there have been some circumstances that had notably excessive ranges.” Based on Heather Stapleton, an publicity scientist and professor at Duke College, the research confirmed ranges in sure samples “much like what has been reported in structural firefighting gear.”
The research didn’t specify the businesses it had sourced its gear from, and NIST didn’t reply to questions from ProPublica. The NIOSH research that the Forest Service officers had been ready on when deciding the way to act, nevertheless, remains to be ongoing.
![[Time Trowel] Heritage shouldn’t be luxurious](https://www.rappler.com/tachyon/2026/01/heritage-mesa-verde-jan-3-2025.jpg "[Time Trowel] Heritage shouldn’t be luxurious")