NPR’s Steve Inskeep talks with John Bolton, a nationwide safety advisor in President Trump’s first time period, in regards to the prospect and dangers of pursuing regime change in Iran.
A MARTÍNEZ, HOST:
President Trump didn’t make a case for a warfare with Iran in his State of the Union speech. But the U.S. appears near warfare, so what’s that case? Our cohost Steve Inskeep referred to as an advocate for regime change. John Bolton is Trump’s former nationwide safety adviser and likewise a Trump critic who was indicted by the administration for his dealing with of categorised data.
STEVE INSKEEP, BYLINE: I need to start with the occasions on the day of the State of the Union speech. Secretary of State Rubio briefed congressional leaders about one thing. Democrats got here out of that assembly saying the president must make his case to the nation. After which the president gave his speech and didn’t actually make a case for regime change or the rest in Iran, though he talked about the subject. What do you learn out of all of that?
JOHN BOLTON: Nicely, I do not assume Trump has essentially made up his thoughts, both what his goal is in a potential use of navy power or what the quantum of that power could be. I feel selections may come pretty shortly if the talks in Geneva between the U.S. and Iran on discussions about their nuclear program do not produce something, which is what I count on will occur. Then you can get a ultimate Trump choice fairly quickly.
INSKEEP: That’s the reason you assume he wouldn’t have made the case for warfare, as a result of he is undecided he needs one?
BOLTON: Nicely, I do not assume he actually understands what the case is. I am undecided he appreciates the importance of what he is about to do. I imply, I am completely in favor of regime change. However I feel you possibly can’t simply announce it in a single speech after which count on that everyone will line up behind you. I feel this can be a political mistake he could also be about to make, however it’s typical of the best way he proceeds.
INSKEEP: What do you imply by that? Do you assume he would not perceive the necessity to get the nation behind him?
BOLTON: Nicely, I feel his basic mode of working is every little thing is a deal. It is transactional. It is not based mostly on nationwide safety concerns or coverage, as we usually describe that time period. So, you already know, deal, a strike to vindicate his pink line towards the ayatollahs for killing their – 32,000 of their fellow residents who had been protesting, overthrow the regime. They’re simply all type of fungible playing cards in his thoughts. And I say that as any individual who has supported regime change in Iran for a very long time. This takes preparation. I feel there are a selection of issues we may do militarily to assist destabilize the regime, and I hope that is what he is pondering.
INSKEEP: Let’s placed on the desk, as you mentioned, that you’ve got advocated regime change for a very long time. Do you assume it will be straightforward to do?
BOLTON: Nicely, I do not essentially assume it will be straightforward. However I do assume the regime is at its weakest level because it took energy in 1979. And if there have been ever a second to try to assist exacerbate the instability within the regime, destabilize it and assist convey it down, I do assume it will be now. There isn’t any query right here of U.S. boots on the bottom. There could also be some particular operators in nation. We might do that along with Israel. However the reality is the Iranian regime is a risk to america. It is a regime that must be overthrown.
INSKEEP: Is that this one thing that actually will be carried out with out boots on the bottom by an exterior power?
BOLTON: Nicely, I feel the position that navy power from the U.S. and maybe from Israel itself may accomplish is to trigger the regime to fragment on the high. We may do this by destroying the devices of state energy in Iran – the Revolutionary Guard, the Basij militia. I feel it is fairly clear that the 12-day warfare, waged primarily by Israel however with someday of participation by the U.S. towards Iran’s nuclear program final yr, destabilized the regime.
The response of the Iranian folks was fairly fascinating. Their conclusion was that if the regime could not even defend its crown jewels, the nuclear and ballistic missile packages, it could not defend itself. And if it will probably’t defend itself, its days are numbered.
INSKEEP: How may an operation like this go improper from the U.S. perspective?
BOLTON: Nicely, it could possibly be that Iran has extra air defenses than we predict. I do not consider that is the case. However I additionally assume that with Israel concerned, that might go a great distance towards ensuring that there aren’t any air defenses. And we do not have limitless time. There’s reporting by Reuters and different information sources that Iran could be very near signing a take care of China to get anti-ship missiles from China. The Iranians are usually not sitting round ready to be targets.
INSKEEP: I am pondering of a few different methods it would go improper. The US drops loads of bombs, fires loads of missiles, blows up loads of issues, however the authorities continues to be there on the finish. One other means it may go improper, I suppose, is Iran retaliates, kills many hundreds of individuals and disrupts the worldwide financial system, significantly the oil visitors.
BOLTON: Nicely, I feel because of this the administration ought to have been in contact with the opposition way back. There have been credible reviews that throughout the demonstrations final month, we offered 6,000 Starlink terminals for the opposition to make use of. I feel that is an excellent factor to have carried out. And I hope that there have been contacts with the opposition since they’re those we want inside Iran to be getting folks – for instance, commanders within the common military – ready to defect to the opposition as they see the regime on the breaking point.
And by way of potential Iranian retaliation, definitely the primary targets on our checklist, or along side Israel, after the air defenses could be Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities. To destroy as a lot as we may each their missile launching websites, their radars, their manufacturing amenities. And in addition, the Iranian navy, to place it on the ground of the Gulf. That basically reduces Iran’s functionality of retaliating. I actually assume that is the second.
INSKEEP: Granting, once more, that this can be a coverage you wish to pursue, do you belief this president and this administration to execute it competently?
BOLTON: Nicely, if the president makes the choice to have using navy power aimed on the goal of aiding the opposition to overthrow the regime, I’ve confidence within the Pentagon so long as Trump retains out of it.
INSKEEP: So long as he retains out of it. What do you imply?
BOLTON: So long as he would not try to second-guess the navy, as he has carried out previously.
INSKEEP: What do you say to People who look again on Iraq or Afghanistan or any variety of examples and discover that U.S. meddling in different international locations has typically gone improper?
BOLTON: Nicely, let’s begin with Germany in 1945. I feel our meddling in Germany labored out fairly properly, significantly for the Germans. I feel our meddling in Japan in 1945 and thereafter labored out fairly properly. There is a lengthy historical past right here. I feel our overthrow of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan was an excellent success.
I feel our largest mistake there was withdrawing below the Trump settlement, then executed by Biden in 2021. And as for Iraq, I feel the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, that a part of it went extraordinarily properly. I feel our mistake – and it was a mistake – was to interact in nation-building thereafter and never flip accountability for creating the brand new Iraqi authorities, leaving that with the Iraqi folks themselves.
INSKEEP: Ambassador Bolton, thanks a lot.
BOLTON: Thanks.
MARTÍNEZ: That was John Bolton, Trump’s former nationwide safety adviser, talking with our cohost Steve Inskeep.
(SOUNDBITE OF DEADLY AVENGER’S “SKIT 2”)
Copyright © 2026 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might range. Transcript textual content could also be revised to right errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.
