For the previous few weeks, Elon Musk’s Grok AI bot has been producing pornographic photos of girls and underage ladies, with out their consent, at an astounding price. A current Bloomberg evaluation discovered that Grok creates 6,700 such photos per hour, or a couple of per minute. On Friday, X ultimately put some minor guardrails on the instrument, with a brand new coverage that solely paying subscribers can use Grok to generate or alter photos. On the standalone Grok app, nonetheless, anybody can immediate Grok to generate new photos, which means the deepfaked porn continues.
Grok has lengthy been one of many extra suggestive of the most important AI fashions, with “spicy” and “horny” settings that may be toggled on and off. Whereas workers have warned that the bot is getting used to generate little one intercourse abuse supplies, Musk has remained dedicated to the concept that Grok can be the sexiest AI mannequin. On X, Musk has defended the selection on enterprise grounds, citing the well-known story of how VHS beat Betamax within the Eighties after the porn business put its weight behind VHS, with its bigger storage capability. “VHS received ultimately,” Musk posted, “partially as a result of they allowed spicy mode 😉.”
There’s a certain quantity of fact to Musk’s take. The porn business tends to reward early adopters, and the cash to be made in porn signifies that it has spectacular leverage in terms of selecting between two competing and incompatible types of know-how.
But the concept that porn as an business, impartial and amorphous, settles tech wars doesn’t present us the entire fact. It might be extra correct to say that the applied sciences we use to generate and share photos are, as a rule, formed by individuals distributing photos of girls’s our bodies — usually with doubtful consent from the ladies themselves. In that sense, Grok’s skills are par for the course.
Porn didn’t solely assist VHS win over Betamax. The business has additionally been linked to the mainstreaming of Tremendous 8 movie (straightforward and handy for novice filmmakers), the growth of streaming video (non-public and simply accessible), the growth of net funds (comes with paywalled streaming video), the growth of net analytics (good for the advanced enterprise transactions of grownup streaming), and the victory of Blu-ray over HD DVD. (Like VHS, Blu-rays held much more information than its opponents, which is particularly enticing within the porn market.)
Then there have been the methods of picture distribution that developed exterior of porn as an business. A stunning quantity of them revolved round individuals attempting to share sexualized photos of girls’s our bodies as shortly as attainable — solely in these circumstances, the individuals whose photos getting distributed weren’t essentially consenting adults who had been getting paid for his or her hassle.
Generally the innovation was roughly innocent. Google Photographs was developed as a result of so many individuals went looking for footage of Jennifer Lopez in her famously low-cut Versace robe in 2000, a distinction Lopez has handled as a feather in her cap. On this case, Lopez wore the costume to a high-profile occasion and wished to be seen and talked about, so it’s affordable to imagine consent.
Different occasions it received cloudier. The impetus for YouTube got here when builders wished to look at Janet Jackson’s 2004 wardrobe malfunction and had been annoyed that it took so lengthy to search out video of it on the web. Jackson has at all times maintained that she didn’t intend for her breast to be seen on nationwide TV, so right here, we’re coping with nonconsensual nudity.
In the meantime, Mark Zuckerberg’s progenitor for Fb was Facesmash, a Scorching or Not rip-off developed to match the ladies of Harvard College’s pupil physique to livestock. The intent right here was much less to create nonconsensual pornography than it was to carry out a sexualized humiliation of nonconsenting girls — an act that turned out to be so fashionable that it overwhelmed Harvard’s servers the evening it launched.
So Musk is just not completely flawed when he says that applied sciences with what he euphemistically refers to as “spicy mode” are inclined to do effectively. A extra correct phrasing, nonetheless, may be to say that in our misogynistic society, objectifying and humiliating the our bodies of unconsenting girls is so precious that the destiny of world-altering applied sciences is determined by how good they’re at facilitating it.
AI was at all times going for use for this, in some way. However solely somebody as brutally uncaring and prepared to chop corners as Elon Musk would enable it to go this flawed.

