The Constancy MSCI Shopper Staples Index ETF (NYSEMKT:FSTA) and the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Shopper Staples ETF (NYSEMKT:RSPS) each goal U.S. client staples shares, however their approaches result in distinct outcomes.
This comparability breaks down how their charges, returns, danger, liquidity, and holdings stack up for traders seeking to entry this defensive sector.
Metric | RSPS | FSTA |
|---|---|---|
Issuer | Invesco | Constancy |
Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.08% |
1-yr return (as of Feb. 3, 2026) | 7.01% | 8.34% |
Dividend yield | 2.82% | 2.34% |
AUM | $232 million | $1.3 billion |
Beta (5Y month-to-month) | 0.52 | 0.55 |
Beta measures worth volatility relative to the S&P 500. The 1-yr return represents complete return over the trailing 12 months.
FSTA is significantly extra reasonably priced than RSPS, with an expense ratio of simply 0.08% versus 0.40%. In different phrases, traders can anticipate to pay $8 per 12 months in charges for each $10,000 invested in FSTA in comparison with $40 per 12 months with RSPS. Additionally, whereas the funds provide comparable dividend yields, RSPS has a slight edge over FSTA.
Metric | RSPS | FSTA |
|---|---|---|
Max drawdown (5 y) | -18.61% | -16.57% |
Development of $1,000 over 5 years | $1,067 | $1,385 |
FSTA holds 96 shares and tracks principally client defensive names (98%), with minor allocations to client cyclical. Its prime positions are concentrated: Costco Wholesale, Walmart, and Procter & Gamble account for almost 37% of property. The fund is designed to reflect the broader client staples sector, however its largest holdings dominate total publicity.
RSPS, against this, equally weights its 36 holdings from the S&P 500’s client staples sector. This presents a extra balanced strategy, as all of its holdings make up roughly 3% of property.
For extra steering on ETF investing, try the complete information at this hyperlink.
FSTA and RSPS every take totally different approaches to the buyer staples business, and the precise alternative in your portfolio will rely in your investing preferences and danger tolerance.
FSTA is dominated by massive manufacturers, with family names accounting for a large share of property. This may be a bonus when these specific firms are thriving, but when they falter, it might hit this ETF tougher.
RSPS, then again, is an equal-weight fund. Whereas it holds far fewer shares than FSTA (simply 36 in comparison with 96), every of these shares makes up roughly the identical proportion of the portfolio. This will help scale back volatility, as all shares are on equal footing and fewer prone to sway the fund’s total efficiency.
There isn’t essentially a transparent winner between the 2 ETFs, as they provide distinctive angles that might attraction to totally different traders.
