In Half 1, we explored the ideology that has been adopted by a robust group of NRx technocrat-oligarchs and the way their proposals align with the pursuits of their worldwide oligarch companions. We mentioned the enterprise capital influence funding technique the NRx technocrats name “accelerationism” and the way governments are literally “purposeful oligarchies.”
The mannequin of “authorities” the NRx technocrats suggest is not like something we’re at the moment aware of. It’s far more akin to the form of authoritarian dictatorships exercised by the feudal monarchs of Medieval Europe. These gov-corp Technates, as envisaged, successfully quantity to dictatorial city-states beneath the direct management of oligarchs.
The NRx technocrats search to interrupt nation-states aside into technologically ruled “enclaves” (gov-corp Technates). These “realms” will kind a world “Patchwork,” with every enclave or “community archipelago” represented as a digital node, virtually definitely on a single, overarching blockchain or “unified ledger.” The digital entry permissions to the node, which serves because the digital twin for the bodily realm of the city-state “enclave,” will likely be managed by the “founder” or their chosen directors of the realm. This kinds a gov-corp Technate dominated by a CEO King (oligarch) the place “nothing formally exists” except it’s represented digitally on the realm’s ledger (blockchain).
The residents of the realm are clients of the sovereign company (sovcorp) that guidelines the gov-corp Technate. The shoppers may have no particular person sovereignty except they buy it from the “founder.” All worth is digital within the realm. The lifetime of your “digital twin,” monitored by way of the requirement to make use of digital ID, seamlessly hyperlinks a buyer’s offline life to that of their on-line digital twin.
By controlling the programmable digital foreign money allotted to the client’s digital twin, through their digital ID, any misbehaviour could be punished by the founder or their delegated system directors. For instance, by freezing “their deposits” or locking folks “out of all doorways for a time interval as a punishment.” There are not any technique of recourse in a gov-corp Technate. The one choice open to the persecuted buyer is to flee, if they’ve the means.
We additionally mentioned how governments world wide have already began carving out nascent gov-corp Technates within the type of 1000’s of Particular Financial Zones (SEZs). A few of which, equivalent to Shenzhen in China, have already been established as de facto city-states with their very own more and more unbiased jurisdictions and embryonic city-state governments.
On the coronary heart of this effort to create a world patchwork of city-states are the NRx technocrats, maybe most notably Peter Thiel, Elon Musk and Marc Andreessen within the US, and enterprise capital companies like NeWay Capital and Pronomos Capital. However they’re removed from alone. The NRx technocrat community is international and, on the highest governmental and intergovernmental stage, the hope is to carry concerning the international governance of a patchwork of city-state gov-corp Technates.
Sensible-Metropolis-States With out Limits
NRx technocrats need to create a world “patchwork” of digital surveillance societies the place “nothing formally exists except it’s on-chain.” All worth is digital and the personal founder[s], by virtues of the supreme sovereignty they’ve bought with their funding, management their personal fiefdoms as CEO “kings” of the ruling firms. In impact, by exploiting digital expertise and, most notably, Synthetic Intelligence (AI), the NRx technocrats need to create a world community of privately financed smart-cities.
A wise-city could be mentioned to be “an city space the place expertise and information assortment assist enhance [. . .] the sustainability and effectivity of metropolis operations. [. . .] Applied sciences to gather information—together with real-time information—are central to smart-city initiatives.” The target of smart-city design is to regulate the city atmosphere and its inhabitants’ behaviour.
Taking a optimistic view of smart-city behavioural management, researchers from the Indonesian Journal of Info Techniques and Informatics nonetheless famous:
The affect of sensible metropolis expertise on client habits in city environments and folks’s every day routines and way of life habits is important. [. . .] The event of smart-cities by way of the applying of assorted applied sciences equivalent to sensible transportation methods, site visitors administration purposes, and sensible sensors [. . .] has modified the habits of individuals. [. . .] Thus, the applying of sensible metropolis expertise not solely transforms metropolis infrastructure and companies, but additionally brings important adjustments in citizen habits.
Although behavioural management exercised by smart-city operators may probably be benign, it may be abused by despots to successfully program our lives. That’s definitely what the NRx technocrats take into account—engineering the “unthinking demos” whose sovereignty will likely be handled with “derision.” Whatever the dangers, smart-cities are being constructed the world over.
The China International Tv Community (CGTN) is a part of the state-run China Media Group. In July of this yr, CGTN reported how the Chinese language authorities was “accelerating” the event of smart-cities. CGTN revealed that Shenzhen received a world award for smart-city of the yr from the 2024 Sensible-Metropolis Expo World Congress (SCEWC).
The SCEWC emphasised how the congress was impressed with Shenzhen’s software of the Chinese language “Smarter Metropolis, Higher Life” coverage initiative that seeks to deal with “city challenges” by way of the fast deployment of expertise. Similar to the NRx technocrats within the West, Chinese language coverage assume tanks apparently see expertise as the answer; full cease.
The SCEWC mentioned:
The initiative has pursued an aggressive digital transformation technique to deal with these challenges throughout numerous sectors. Key parts embody the event of high-speed broadband networks, utilizing digital twin expertise to mannequin and handle metropolis methods, and integrating synthetic intelligence and data-driven governance into metropolis operations. [. . .] Town has additionally fostered an atmosphere that encourages technological innovation and has attracted important funding from personal corporations growing smart-city applied sciences.
Once more, there isn’t a notable distinction between the stakeholder capitalist—public-private partnership—finance mannequin for smart-city development in China’s SEZs than that discovered wherever else.
The SCEWC continued:
Shenzhen has pioneered the “4321+X” mannequin for sensible group improvement, emphasizing integrating authorities networks, video networks, IoT sensor networks, and the web to create complete information and repair platforms. These platforms present a basis for numerous sensible metropolis purposes, together with public security administration, group governance, and the supply of public companies.
The 4321+X smart-city “group” is managed based mostly upon a set of clearly outlined processes. The “4” refers back to the integration of 4 information networks: the federal government’s community, personal group CCTV networks, the web, and particularly the Web of Issues (IoT). The “3” pertains to the three areas of group exercise to be built-in inside and surveilled by way of the 4 networks: all enterprise, public safety (public conduct), and the native governance of companies, together with native safety companies. The “2” Refers to 2 main service sectors—known as “platforms”—that mix to impact the monitoring of the three key areas of exercise linked to the 4 networks. The 2 “platforms” are native authorities and legislation enforcement.
Lastly, the “1” refers back to the grasp database which, when Distributed Ledger Know-how (DLT)—equivalent to blockchain—is used, could possibly be known as the “unified ledger.” The ledger ties all of the surveillance of your entire smart-city, combining 4, 3, and a pair of collectively, into one centrally administered smart-city system. The smart-city supposedly facilitates “X” which is the artificially clever supply of governance and companies to the citizen.
The unified ledger (“1”) is monitored and managed by the “City Mind” or “Metropolis Mind” which is the central command system for the smart-city. The City Planning Society of China—a non-governmental organisation (NGO) that operates by approval from China’s Ministry of Building and Ministry of Civil Affairs—states that the aim of the “City Mind” is to allocate “public assets” and improve “social governance” with the intention to present “new pathways for selling sustainable financial and social improvement.”
As we famous in Half 1, China’s fashionable technological innovation is overwhelmingly the results of public-private partnership. In Hangzhou, as an example, the Metropolis Mind is managed by one international company:
Alibaba is the powerhouse of the expertise from information platforms to advance analytics algorithm that allows all of the sensible metropolis software.
In NRx technocrat phrases, Alibaba Group is the sovereign company (sovcorp) of town of Hangzhou, with a substantial potential to probably management the lives of its 9 million residents or “clients.” As with all smart-city developments, the media solely experiences the realised or projected social advantages. The seemingly pitfalls are studiously ignored. To know the hazard all of us face, if we take to residing in such cities, we first want to think about how social credit methods are meant to work.
There are various, persistent myths peddled within the West about China’s Social Credit score System (SCS). The mainstream media will typically have you ever imagine that it’s already a totalitarian nightmare and a few within the unbiased media will attempt to persuade you that’s doesn’t exist. The reality lies someplace in between.
China is the one nation to have formally established an SCS, however it isn’t the one nation to have applied one. The aim of social credit score is to reward or punish citizen behaviour, not by way of the courts or any authorized course of, however by way of the improved or restricted entry to each private and non-private companies. Operation Choke Level within the US noticed the Division of Justice collaborate with personal banks to cut-off entry to finance for fully authorized small to medium dimension companies deemed to current a “reputational threat.” Equally, in Canada, the federal government labored with personal banks, and insurers to shut down the small companies of lawful and bonafide protestors. These are simply a few the numerous clear examples of SCS working within the West.
China’s SCS was formally established in 2014. It’s a sprawling and infrequently complicated slew of presidency directives and laws that every provincial authority has to decipher and apply as finest as it might. The overarching goal is to ascertain a measure of “societal creditworthiness.” This doesn’t simply imply “credit score” within the monetary sense. It pertains to the diploma of “trustworthiness” the state credit to its personal departments and native administrations, to companies and to people.
China’s SCS refers to “entities,” that means each private and non-private organisations, together with companies. A lot of the SCS is targeted upon cleansing up public sector corruption, eliminating the “untrustworthiness” of these entities with the intention to promote a “harmonious” society.
It additionally focuses on the “untrustworthiness” of people. An SCS goal is to “put untrustworthy people on a credit score blacklist.” One other is to develop on-line methods to judge particular person’s on-line social credit score “trustworthiness” and, as an example, to punish those that have interaction in on-line “rumour-mongering;” it talks about methods to evaluate the “particular person character” of residents and the enforcement of “citizen morality.”
In China, a “pure individual” is a authorized assemble meaning a human being or citizen. In its 2025 introduced enhancements to its SCS, the Chinese language authorities inspired regional authorities to advertise “the credit score development of pure individuals” and to ascertain “sound credit score data of pure individuals.”
Trying on the improvement of the smart-city in Shenzhen, and the dangers of pooling “massive information,” researchers from the Berlin Institute of Chinese language Research discovered:
[T]he digital methods in Shenzhen entail a creeping centralisation of knowledge that probably turns decrease administrative authorities models into mere customers of the city-level sensible platforms quite than being answerable for their very own information assets. Sensible metropolis improvement and massive information ambitions thereby suggest shifting stakeholder relations on the native stage and likewise pull non-governmental stakeholders, equivalent to data expertise corporations and analysis establishments, nearer to new information flows and sensible governance methods.
In a world formed by stakeholder capitalism, “sensible governance methods” are invariably managed by the personal sector. Native governments turn out to be the “mere customers” of the “Metropolis Brains” overseen by multinational firms. The evident goal is to hyperlink the behavioural management afforded by smart-city expertise to SCS.
As identified by MIT Know-how Evaluation in 2022, there may be at the moment no crushing, common social credit score rating in China that allows totalitarian management:
There’s no proof but that this technique has been abused for widespread social management (although it stays attainable that it could possibly be wielded to harm particular person rights).
Certainly, smart-city expertise mixed with SCS definitely could possibly be wielded to socially engineer populations. The push in direction of smart-city developments able to making use of SCS “guidelines” are on no account restricted to China. It’s a international governance coverage agenda and the rollout of the mandatory digital infrastructure is worldwide. Although most of us are but to expertise the looming overt systematic oppression, this can be very unwise to disregard that indisputable fact that the seemingly digital panopticon is being erected round us.
If we settle for the continued transformation of the locations we stay into smart-cities and smart-suburbs, it’s the “belief” we may have positioned in our rulers, whoever they could be, that’s the salient problem. We may have no alternative however to belief that the digital management methods we are going to stay in are purely for our profit. We should belief that the enforcement of the SCS guidelines will likely be equitable. There may be at the moment no cause to assume that would be the case.
The potential city future that the oligarchs driving this agenda take into account is aligned with the ambitions of the NRx technocrats. It seems that our deliberate sensible city-state future is an envisioned tyranny.
Intergovernmental Gov-corp Technates
The worldwide proliferation of SEZs gives loads of engaging funding alternatives for NRx technocrats and different oligarchs (See Half 1). SEZs, nonetheless, are only one avenue for the potential location of gov-corp Technates. The worldwide transition towards urbanization provides many extra.
Paradoxically, the United Nations (UN) each experiences on the rampant criminality widespread to many SEZ developments but additionally advocates the fast and important enlargement of SEZs. As famous in Half 1, there may be at the moment little or no proof that SEZs ship socioeconomic development. There may be appreciable proof that they seize nationwide territory and remodel it into efficient personal jurisdictions.
But, in 2022, the UN established the International Alliance of Particular Financial Zones (GASEZ) to extend the SEZ international footprint. GASEZ claims:
Particular financial zones (SEZs) could make essential contributions to financial development and sustainable improvement. Zones may also help appeal to funding, create jobs, increase exports, and construct productive capability. [. . .] Collectively SEZs could be simpler in modernization and coverage advocacy, and convey on board stakeholders, together with governments, the personal sector and worldwide organizations.
Once more, there may be nearly no proof to assist GASEZ’ assertions about financial development. The explanation the UN is keen about SEZ hybrid zone/metropolis developments is that the UN considers them a simpler route for its international “coverage advocacy.”
Launching GASEZ in 2022, the UN introduced:
UNCTAD [United Nations Conference on Trade and Development ] joined fingers with seven international, regional and nationwide associations representing over 7,000 particular financial zones (SEZs) to launch a world alliance. [. . .] They [SEZs] go by many various names, together with free-trade zones and industrial parks, and are broadly utilized by developed and growing economies. The International Alliance of Particular Financial Zones (GASEZ) seeks to drive the modernization of those zones internationally and maximize their contribution to the UN Sustainable Improvement Targets (SDGs). [. . .] A brand new mannequin of sustainable particular financial zones is subsequently quickly taking form and they’re contributing to extra inclusive, resilient and sustainable economies within the nations the place they function.
The UN calls the cities and cities we stay in “human settlements.” Constitution Cities, SEZs with residential capability, hybrid zone/metropolis developments, resilient cities, 15-minute cities, and many others., are all “human settlements” so far as the UN is anxious. Moreover, all such city renewal persistently embraces smart-city expertise.
In 1977, the UN created the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) with the intention to promote “socially and environmentally sustainable cities and cities.” UN-Habitat states:
UN-Habitat is the point of interest for all urbanization and human settlement issues throughout the UN system. [. . .] UN-Habitat collaborates with governments, intergovernmental, UN businesses, civil society organizations, foundations, educational establishments and the personal sector to attain enduring leads to addressing the challenges of urbanization.
Urbanization is the method of the inhabitants shift from rural to city residing environments, or human settlements within the vernacular of the UN. UN-Habitat has wholeheartedly adopted the public-private partnership, or stakeholder capitalist, mannequin of improvement to deal with “the challenges of urbanization.”
In 2018, the UN Division of Financial and Social Affairs (UN DESA) reported the findings of its analysis into World Urbanization Prospects:
In the present day, 55% of the world’s inhabitants lives in city areas, a proportion that’s anticipated to extend to 68% by 2050. Projections present that urbanization [. . .] mixed with the general development of the world’s inhabitants may add one other 2.5 billion folks to city areas by 2050, with near 90% of this improve happening in Asia and Africa. [. . .] By 2030, the world is projected to have 43 megacities with greater than 10 million inhabitants, most of them in growing areas [. . .] lots of them situated in Asia and Africa. [. . .] Because the world continues to urbanize, sustainable improvement relies upon more and more on the profitable administration of city development, particularly in low-income and lower-middle-income nations the place the tempo of urbanization is projected to be the quickest.
With this urbanization prospectus in thoughts, and with a specific deal with managing city improvement within the “International South”—an umbrella time period for growing nations wherever they’re situated—UN-Habitat launched its Strategic Plan 2020-2023:
UN-Habitat, in its function as a focus, will name upon all improvement actors and stakeholders, [. . .] to work in live performance to help it in implementing its Strategic Plan. [. . .] An essential effort is required to rethink engagement with the personal sector to leverage funding in sustainable urbanization and to advertise extra acceptable fashions of improvement.
The UN is raring to liberate personal finance with the intention to assemble human smart-megacity settlements, particularly within the rising and growing markets of the International South, that meet UN sustainable urbanization targets. Sustainable Improvement Purpose 11—SDG 11—defines the international public-private partnership’s metropolis improvement agenda.
The UN calls this its “New City Agenda.” The New City Agenda emphasises the significance of constructing “smart-cities” to satisfy SDGs:
The New City Agenda requires expertise and communication networks to be strengthened and for smart-city approaches that use digitalization, clear vitality and applied sciences. [. . .] Modern funding alternatives and partnerships must be explored and the capability of native governments to successfully procure, take a look at and implement frontier applied sciences must be considerably strengthened. [. . .] To contribute successfully to city sustainability, frontier applied sciences and improvements must be utilized.
The “smart-city” is constructed by deploying so-called “frontier applied sciences” inside its infrastructure. A wise-city could possibly be constructed from scratch or developed in an current metropolis or conurbation. The UN explains what smart-city frontier expertise it considers important for city sustainability:
[Frontier technologies] at the moment embody, amongst others, the Web of issues, sensor networks, machine-to-machine communication, robotics, synthetic intelligence, digital and augmented actuality, 3D printing, geographic data methods (GIS), distant sensing, autonomous unmanned automobiles, drones, blockchain, cryptographic computing, and massive information processing and visualization.
The UN’s “frontier applied sciences” are, after all, precisely the form of applied sciences that the NRx technocrats allege to be the technological resolution to all the things (see Half 1). Gov-corp Technates are virtually indistinguishable from the hybrid zone/metropolis developments envisaged by the UN’s New City Agenda.
The draw back, from humanity’s perspective, is that at each the worldwide intergovernmental stage and on the international multinational corporate-network stage, there’s a agency dedication to put in the biometric digital surveillance state that threatens to enslave us all. Although the UN calls this “sustainable improvement.”
The International Governance Patchwork
Not solely is the UN amenable to the NRx technocrat’s digital panopticon plans, it additionally favours their “patchwork of realms” concept. The UN considers the way forward for international governance to put in centralised international authority exerted over a transnational community of city-states. Or, as UN-Habitat places it, “connectivity throughout city networks, between cities and their environment [. . .] have to be strengthened. That requires a country-wide – and typically cross-border – method to improvement.”
The UN’s international governance mannequin has been shifting on this path or some time. In 2005, then London Mayor Ken Livingston convened the C20 metropolis community, inviting mayors from one other eighteen cities to work collectively to cut back so-called local weather air pollution (CO2 emissions). In 2006, the addition of twenty-two metropolis mayors created the C40 cities community.
The C40 cities community is financed by, amongst others, the Youngsters’s Funding Fund Basis (CIFF) which is closely backed by the Gates Basis. The intention of CIFF is to enhance the lives of kids residing within the International South by “lobbying” their governments to create regulatory “enabling environments” to stimulate nationwide carbon buying and selling within the international Emissions Buying and selling Scheme (ETF) markets.
One other distinguished C40 funder is Bloomberg Philanthropies, led by oligarch and former New York Metropolis mayor, Michael Bloomberg. All the time pushed by a dedication to UN international governance insurance policies, in 2011, C40 formalised its relationship with the UN by agreeing on a local weather motion partnership with the World Financial institution—a specialised company of the UN. Such UN partnerships are consistent with UN ambitions to domesticate its international governance by way of a world community of city-states.
In 2013, American political theorist Benjamin R. Barber (1939 – 2017) revealed If Mayors Dominated the World: Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities. Barber contended that metropolis administrations have been extra intently related to their populations and thus extra democratically consultant than nation-states. He argued that metropolis administrations, in nations world wide, had extra in widespread with one another than that they had with their very own nationwide governments. Unencumbered by political divisions and nationwide rivalries, he posited that cities have been higher “constructing blocks of worldwide governance.”
Advocating a world community of cities, Barber wrote:
If democracy is to outlive globalization, imagining a world democratic order with town at its core could also be essential. Envision not states however cities as constructing blocks for international governance. [. . .] International governance through which town predominates is the intention.
Evidently enthused by Barber’s imaginative and prescient, Michael Bloomberg introduced he was stepping down as Mayor of New York and arrange the primary CityLab summit in 2013. Mayors from cities world wide have been invited to community and collaborate with the intention to “change concepts and deal with a few of the most pressing points affecting cities world wide.”
In 2014, a month after formally leaving workplace in New York, Bloomberg was appointed because the UN’s first Particular Envoy for Cities and Local weather Change. Thus strengthening the hyperlink between city improvement and the implementation of the worldwide governance agenda.
UN Secretary Basic Ban Ki-moon mentioned the target of making the publish for Bloomberg was for the UN to seek the advice of “with mayors and associated key stakeholders” with the intention to “mobilize motion amongst cities as a part of [the UN’s] long-term technique.” Already the president of the board of the C40 cities community, Bloomberg quickly established the Compact of Mayors committing metropolis leaders to implement UN SDGs.
In 2016, the UN’s International Compact of Mayors joined with the same European Union’s (EU’s) Covenant of Mayors to turn out to be the International Covenant of Mayors for Local weather and Vitality (GCoM). At the moment performing because the UN Secretary-Basic’s Particular Envoy on Local weather Ambition and Options, Michael Bloomberg is the present co-chair of the GCoM.
The GCoM established the INVEST4CITIES initiative to generate “huge and focused funding” to assemble smart-cities. The personal sector funding alternative is ready to supply “$23 trillion in funding potential” by 2030. The general public sector’s (native authorities’s) function is to create “the enabling environments that assist native funding.” The GCoM plan is that “large-scale financing devices” will fund “native implementation” of frontier applied sciences to assemble international governance (SDG) compliant smart-cities.
In the identical yr (2016) that the GCoM was signed by a world community of mayors, Bloomberg created the International Parliament of Mayors (GPM) to provide the civic leaders formal international governance roles. The GPM was first mooted in 2013 by Bloomberg CityLab based mostly on Benjamin Barber’s “concept of a world governance platform for cities.” Barber was personally concerned within the formation of the GPM and, when he died in 2017, the GPM created the annual Benjamin Barber Award, given to probably the most international governance compliant mayor of the yr.
The objective of the GPM is to assault the supposed political sovereignty of nationwide governments and reimagine worldwide relations. The GPM champions “town’s proper to self-government” and promotes “collective metropolis decision-making throughout nationwide borders.” The GPM is “actively engaged in decision-making by worldwide organisations.” The GPM is the UN’s expression of Barber’s imaginative and prescient of “international governance through which town predominates.”
In 2017, adopting the NRx technocrats’ accelerationism, the C40 community began implementing quite a lot of “Excessive-Impression Accelerators.” The C40 accelerators kind one of many “mission pipelines” that contributes towards the GCoM’s INVEST4CITIES technique.
The GCoM goals to “speed up metropolis and native authorities entry to monetary assets” by “eradicating obstacles to investor-oriented local weather motion plans and initiatives, and unlocking large-scale financing devices to spice up city motion implementation.” As you’ll be able to think about, with $23 trillion of funding alternatives in sight, the envisaged ROI will not be solely mouthwatering, if the deliberate city-state is a startup mission it additionally guarantees oligarchs attainable metropolis possession rights (see Half 1).
The UN Financial Fee for Europe (UNECE) convened the Day of Cities in 2019. Mayors from throughout, what the UN known as, “the area”—that means Europe—met to debate “how one can create sensible sustainable cities.” This resulted within the 2020 Geneva Declaration of Mayors. In response to a number of alleged international crises—the pseudopandemic, the local weather disaster, pure disasters, and many others.—the UNECE mayors famous how the worldwide coverage response to the pseudopandemic could possibly be adopted as a mannequin for city improvement:
[C]ities have been in lockdown – and lots of industries, transport networks and companies closed – we [. . .] began to expertise an unknown city life: higher air high quality, the return of nature to our cities, and empty streets giving house to cyclists and pedestrians. [. . .] The pandemic supplied a testing floor for what cities may appear like; the transformation of city areas occurred in a single day. If there is just one lesson to be taught from this disaster, it’s that fast change of our city actuality is feasible [and] behaviour patterns could be tailored. [. . .] Sustainable Improvement Purpose (SDG) 11 requires motion to work in direction of [. . .] resilient and sustainable cities – it’s now in our fingers to put the SDGs on the centre of our restoration efforts and create new city realities.
In the present day, boasting “over 13,500 cities and native governments” from “6 continents and 147 nations” the GCoM alleges that it represents “greater than 1.2 billion folks.” It’s, nonetheless, arduous to see how GCoM “represents” anybody aside from its public-private “stakeholders.” One wonders how many individuals who elect their native and metropolis “representatives” in these GCoM coordinated cities and suburbs are advised that they’re consenting to international governance and the transformation of their communities into smart-city gov-corp Technates.
Empty streets, no automobiles, drone ports, driverless AI managed public transport, protein labs rising synthetic meals substitutes, augmented actuality, insect-based snacks, and new spiritual identities are a part of what main oligarch-led assume tank Chatham Home (The Royal Institute of Worldwide Affairs) predicted in 2021 with its notion of our Futurescape. Whether or not that is the long run city-life any of us need is irrelevant. At each stage, NRx technocrats and their fellow oligarchs view such “urbanization” because the pathway to establishing efficient international governance.
That the UN considers societal lockdowns as an exemplar of what it calls a “higher city life” betrays the oligarchs’ true intentions.
The International Governance of Sensible-Cities
The United Nations (UN) declares that it’s accountable for international governance. The UN additionally says that “governance” means: “the method of decision-making and the method by which choices are applied.” Due to this fact, the UN asserts that it’s the physique which makes and implements choices—which manifest as authorities coverage—for the world.
UN-Habitat—the UN’s “point of interest for all urbanization and human settlement issues”—with its New City Agenda to remodel the city atmosphere into a world community of smart-cities, extols stakeholder capitalism and is eager to make use of the related public-private partnership mannequin. In 2022, UN-Habitat and the World Financial Discussion board (WEF) created the The International Partnership for Native Funding (GPLI). The GPLI instantly arrange the G20 International smart-cities Alliance and clarified its public-private objective:
Public-private collaborations replicate a type of oblique administration in public administration, the place [. . .] public, personal or non-profit companions make choices collectively. [. . .] Public-private collaborations can repurpose metropolis belongings for the deployment of digital infrastructure. [. . .] Bodily belongings, equivalent to rooftops, utility poles, road lights, site visitors lights, ducts and extra, can turn out to be sensible belongings and be used to drive efficiencies and new companies. Public areas and airspace can tackle new worth as expertise, equivalent to drones, enabl[e] [sic] new use circumstances.
UN-Habitat and the WEF spotlight the personal sector funding alternative for these with the wealth to capitalise on them—oligarchs:
[S]mart-city companies can generate new income streams and income financial savings to be shared between companions.
The Futurescape imagined by Chatham Home is beneath development with the assist of the United Nations and the “main” multinational firms aligned beneath the WEF umbrella. Additionally it is a mission shared by the BRICS+ group of countries and their company companions.
The BRICS have established the Basic Meeting of Cities and Municipalities which can deal with “inter-municipal cooperation” quite than worldwide cooperation. Following the 2025 BRICS summit in Brazil, the BRICS group issued a joint assertion:
One of many key matters shaping the way forward for the BRICS is the event of smart-cities supported by rising applied sciences, significantly synthetic intelligence (AI). [. . .] With the current enlargement of the BRICS to incorporate nations equivalent to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, and Iran, the bloc is establishing itself as a number one platform for International South cooperation [. . .] significantly within the realm of sustainable urbanization pushed by applied sciences equivalent to AI. [. . .] Synthetic intelligence is more and more being adopted in main BRICS cities, notably impacting city planning, public service administration, and civic engagement. China is on the forefront of growing AI-powered smart-cities, significantly in Shanghai and Shenzhen.
The BRICS+ group emphasises the significance of the BRICS New Improvement Financial institution (NDB) to “finance sustainable infrastructure” and “improve lending for AI-driven public service initiatives.” The group observes that “South-South cooperation by way of the BRICS creates energetic dialogue.”
The UN considers cooperation within the “South-South”—referring to partnerships between Southern hemisphere nations—“a key improvement modality to speed up progress in direction of attaining the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Improvement.” The UN Workplace for South-South Cooperation (UNOSSC) collaborates strategically with the Islamic Improvement Financial institution (IsDB). In flip, the IsDB has a detailed working partnership with the NDB. Each the IsDB and the NDB have joined seven different “Multilateral Improvement Banks” (MDBs) to kind a world collaborative partnership coordinated by the UN’s World Financial institution Group:
A a lot scaled up international effort is thus required to [. . .] deal with transboundary [meaning cross-national border] challenges. [. . .] We [Heads of MDBs] will deepen our collaboration round joint revolutionary mechanisms for enhancing personal capital mobilization, each domestically and globally. [. . .] We acknowledge the necessity to discover additional avenues for strengthening mobilization of personal capital.
No matter the place you reside on the Earth, your authorities’s dedication to creating a world community of sensible hybrid zone/cities financed by “personal capital” is unshakable as a result of your authorities is following a world coverage agenda it didn’t create and can’t change.
In Vietnam, for instance, the dedication to setting up smart-cities is important. Vietnam’s state media, The Voice of Vietnam (VoV), experiences:
Vietnam is present process a sweeping transformation with a transparent objective: to construct smart-cities that serve the folks. The trouble is predicated on nationwide methods just like the Sustainable smart-city Improvement Plan 2018-2025 with a imaginative and prescient to 2030, the Nationwide Digital Transformation Program till 2025 with a imaginative and prescient to 2030, the E-Authorities Improvement Technique towards a Digital Authorities, and Mission 06 on inhabitants information and digital id.
The VoV states that residents in smart-cities can “report points on to authorities, who reply and take corrective motion.” Vietnamese digital smart-city residents can increase issues regarding “public safety[,] environmental administration, healthcare, [. . .] training,” and extra through their put in smart-city app. The VoV enthusiastically notes that centrally situated AI monitored Clever Operations Facilities (IOCs)—City or Metropolis Brains—linked to peoples’ gadgets and their Vietnam Digital Identification (VNeID), issued by Vietnam’s Ministry of Public Safety (MPS), successfully flip the Vietnamese smart-city residents’ “smartphones into ‘microphones.’”
The VoV provides:
Residents should additionally play their half: verifying VNeID at stage 2, importing private paperwork to their digital accounts, utilizing the nationwide portal [. . .] for public companies, downloading their native smart-city app, and utilizing cashless funds wherever attainable. Each faucet on a display screen lays one other brick in constructing Vietnam’s imaginative and prescient of contemporary, clever, habitable cities for the long run.
The state taking virtually unimaginable management of each “citizen’s” life is a part of Vietnam’s digital transformation plan—Mission 06. The Vietnamese authorities has already began the method of freezing as much as 86 million of Vietnam’s estimated 200 million banks accounts except they’re “verified” utilizing state accredited digital ID (biometric authentication or VNeID). So clearly, each citizen “should” comply and the digital transformation, regardless of all of the fluffy rhetoric about inclusion, is avowedly exclusionary.
Mission 06 is led by the State Financial institution of Vietnam (SBV) working intently with the Ministry of Public Safety (MPS). A significant a part of the function of the MPS is to make sure social order and to gather, analyse and consider data with a view to “forestall, detect and defeat any plots and acts of violation towards nationwide safety and get rid of any threats to nationwide safety,” to guard the “Occasion” and the “State,” and to “implement worldwide commitments and obligations.”
The digital surveillance plan has been promoted by Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh and different authorities officers, however the Mission 06 coverage initiative didn’t originate with the Vietnamese authorities. With its acknowledged “imaginative and prescient to 2030,” Mission 06 is firmly rooted within the United Nations’ (UN’s) international governance agenda.
The Vietnamese Ministry of Planning and Improvement famous that the nation’s digital transformation will contribute to the discount of (CO2) emissions, although it’s clearly designed to allow state surveillance of the inhabitants. Talking in January this yr, UN Beneath-Secretary-Basic Amandeep Singh Gill mentioned he was impressed with Vietnam’s public-private partnership (multistakeholder) method to “harness digital applied sciences for inclusive, sustainable improvement.”
He added:
I noticed with my very own eyes how Viet Nam is pushing ahead strongly and proactively within the areas of digital transformation and AI. [. . .] [F]rameworks are wanted to make sure that everybody advantages from the technical development, and that nobody is left behind. [. . .] The International Digital Compact provides such a framework on the international stage, and Viet Nam’s willingness to play an energetic function in key areas of the [sic] is welcomed and appreciated by the United Nations.
The International Digital Compact, adopted with no vote in September 2024 by UN member states as an annex to the UN’s Pact for the Future, is the UN’s “international framework” to facilitate “multi-stakeholder motion” to allow “the attainment of the Sustainable Improvement Targets.” The UN outlined “digital public items” as software program, information, AI fashions, and all content material revealed on-line. Additional, it determined that “digital public infrastructure” primarily meant all {hardware} and the bodily infrastructure for all digital communication methods.
The UN mentioned that it thought of “digital public items and digital public infrastructure to be key drivers of inclusive digital transformation and innovation.” It added that “[g]overnments, the personal sector, civil society, technical and educational communities and worldwide and regional organizations” ought to work collectively to to “leverage digital public items and digital public infrastructure to advance options for the Sustainable Improvement Targets.”
In different phrases, the UN determined that the web and digital expertise, in its entirety, ought to be leveraged to ship the UN’s international governance coverage agendas. The UN invited the “personal sector and philanthropic actors [oligarchs]” to finance the digital transformation.
Populations won’t need to go together with the digital transformation of their world, nor the diploma of public-private state surveillance foisted upon them. Maybe anticipating some pushback, the UN determined that something that questioned its transformative international governance agenda constituted a “type of violence” it calls “misinformation and disinformation”:
We should urgently counter and deal with all types of violence, together with [. . .] all types of hate speech and discrimination, misinformation and disinformation. [. . .] We decide to, by 2030, [. . .] assess the influence of misinformation and disinformation on the achievement of the Sustainable Improvement Targets. [. . .] We additional urgently [. . .] [c]all on social media platforms to supply researchers entry to information [. . .] to construct an proof base on how one can deal with misinformation and disinformation and hate speech that may inform authorities and trade insurance policies, requirements and finest practices
The concept governments and personal firms ought to kind “insurance policies” to deal with “misinformation and disinformation” would possibly sound affordable at first, however that every one relies upon upon who decides what constitutes misinformation and disinformation. The UN is obvious that misinformation and disinformation incudes data that undermines its insurance policies associated to “public well being and local weather motion.”
Questioning the worldwide digital transformation that’s designed to “advance options for the Sustainable Improvement Targets” threatens “local weather motion” and is subsequently disinformation that governments and personal firms ought to “counter and deal with.” Governments world wide are implementing legal guidelines and laws to seize management of the knowledge we will share with that objective in thoughts.
In fact, this might not be extra anti-democratic, however governments function purposeful oligarchies not democracies. Not one of the governments which have handed or intend to go on-line censorship legal guidelines are the instigators of those insurance policies or legislative strikes. They emanate from the worldwide governance of the UN and its businesses the place actual Orbital Authority is exercised.
Actual Orbital Authority
In Half 1, we mentioned NRx technocrat Curtis Yarvin’s metaphorical exploration of worldwide authorities that he termed “Orbital Authority.” The worldwide transformation of our city environments is already being propelled by such authority.
It’s an oligarch-led public-private, or multistakeholder, international governance authority. Oligarch-backed coverage assume tanks, equivalent to Bloomberg’s CityLab, and the state-funded public-private partnership assume tanks, just like the China Academy of Info and Communications Know-how (CAICT), kind the coverage and design the corresponding implementation initiatives.
The CAICT calls itself “a specialised think-tank for the federal government and an innovation and improvement platform for the trade.” The CAICT acts as an “enabler for innovation and improvement in an data society.” It’s a public-private partnership that “performs an essential function in technique and coverage” with respect to the digital transformation in China.
Chinese language state media lately reported China’s official launch of its plan to supply “processing assets throughout China,” to hyperlink Metropolis Brains and different smart-city parts collectively in a “mega computing mission” that can create regional information hubs. From the experiences, you’d think about that the CPC was main the rollout. That impression is deceptive. It was the CAICT that proposed the idea of the “Nationwide Built-in Computing Energy and Community Scheduling Platform” that has given rise to the reportedly state-led mega computing mission.
The CAICT can be a UN accomplice with an settlement in place to implement the “digital transformation aligned with the Sustainable Improvement Targets” throughout Africa. African governments are usually not designing “Africa’s digital future” any greater than China’s authorities is heading the “digital transformation” in China. The transformation is a world governance agenda, far past the affect of any citizens or inhabitants, and nationwide governments’ function is merely to create the enabling atmosphere (see Half 1) to ascertain the resultant international governance.
The UN totally backs and promotes this worldwide digital transformation. As well as, the UN has already established international governance constructions “through which town predominates.” This unwavering transformation of the worldwide polity and societal norms is exactly what the NRx technocrats need and are dedicated to attaining. The Orbital Authority that Curtis Yarvin deems vital for “1000’s of unbiased sovereign states and city-states” to “flourish” is being constructed by the UN and its multinational company “stakeholders.”
The UN is predominantly an oligarch-led mission. In 2014, professor of worldwide historical past Ludovic Tournès, writing for The Journal of Trendy European Historical past, highlighted the numerous affect of the Rockefellers in establishing the United Nations. Within the late Fifties, the Rockefeller-funded Particular Research Mission started publishing its findings, culminating within the 1961 publication of the complete report titled “Prospect for America: The Rockefeller Panel Reviews.”
Searching for to strengthen UN international governance, The Rockefeller Research Mission advisable dividing the world “into smaller models” that will “encompass regional establishments beneath a world physique of rising authority [the UN]” (web page 26). The researchers finally advisable:
Probably the most pure multination preparations are regularly regional. [. . .] We imagine that this regional method has world-wide validity. [. . .] What is required instantly is a willpower to maneuver within the path they suggest. Regional preparations are now not a matter of alternative. They’re imposed by the necessities of expertise, science, and economics. Our course is to contribute to this course of by constructive motion [pages 188–190].
The thought of a world governance system, based mostly upon a regional steadiness of energy, had been pursued by a trans-Atlantic oligarch community—of which the Rockefellers are main members—for the reason that early twentieth century. As a part of the method of “constructive motion” to ascertain this new world order, in 1965 the Rockefellers convened an worldwide convention at their Villa Serbelloni mansion in Bellagio, Italy. In the present day known as the Bellagio Heart, the 1965 assembly on the Villa arrange the Membership of Rome coverage assume tank which solidified as “a core group of like-minded thinkers” in 1968.
In September 1973, the Membership of Rome proposed a world governance mannequin that divided the world into ten areas. Of their report, titled “Regionalized and Adaptive Mannequin of the International World System,” they described these international governance areas as “Kingdoms.”
The identical yr, David Rockefeller co-founded the Trilateral Fee coverage assume tank with US political scientist and coverage advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski. Unsurprisingly, the Trilateral Fee claims the authority to “have an effect on [. . .] international coverage and nationwide safety methods,” throughout three international areas it calls pillars: North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The present mannequin of regional Kingdoms—“pillars” or “poles”—is usually known as multipolarity and the resultant Multipolar World Order (MWO) is claimed to be in prospect.
The Munich Safety Convention (MSC) is the premier worldwide public-private safety coverage convention the place predominantly, however not completely, Western “decision-makers” meet yearly to community and kind worldwide defence and safety coverage. The MSC 2025 report informs us that there’s a “altering international distribution of energy,” including {that a} “multipolar world holds important promise.” Nevertheless, it additionally notes that the brand new multipolar international governance paperwork should not impede “joint approaches to international crises and threats.”
The MSC decided that “depolarization [. . .] may set multipolarity on a optimistic monitor,” the place “depolarization” refers back to the course of of countries accepting their sociopolitical and maybe cultural variations however aligning to their respective “poles” with the intention to deal with “international crises” by way of collective motion. To elucidate its “depolarization” level, on behalf of the MSC “decision-makers” it represents, the MSC report referenced the 2023 feedback of then German Chancellor Olaf Scholtz who mentioned, with the intention to “hold multilateralism alive in a multipolar world,” it was important to keep up “larger participation in, and integration into, the worldwide order.” In different phrases, depolarization is multipolar decentralisation resulting in larger centralisation throughout the international “order.”
This is identical decentralization to recentralization trick (see Half 1) favoured by the NRx technocrats. Depolarization will not be remodeling international governance by probability. Influential oligarch-led coverage assume tanks, such because the UK-based Chatham Home and its sister organisation, the US Council on Overseas Relations (CFR), have been making an attempt to create the depolarized regional steadiness of energy international governance system for greater than a century.
The Council on Overseas Relations is among the many many Western oligarch-led assume tanks to have persistently promoted multipolarity. In 2023, a group of CFR analysts expressed their opinion about what would represent the proper “pole” in a Multipolar World Order:
The EU [European Union] is a networked union that permits its members to behave collectively in some methods and aside in others. The EU [. . .] has much more energy over its members, which stay sovereign states, than some other regional entity. It’s one in all a sort. [. . .] The EU has developed a template that different regional organizations are following and customizing in numerous methods. [. . .] Overseas coverage practitioners ought to hope these blocs succeed. Highly effective regional unions are the mandatory intermediaries between worldwide or international establishments and state and native governments.
In accordance with the CFR, the European Union (EU) presents us with the best “template” for a MWO pole. Talking on the 2025 Munich Safety Convention, H.E. Wang Yi, Director of the CPC’s Committee Overseas Affairs, careworn that “China has at all times seen in Europe an essential pole within the multipolar world.” China is at the moment main the push to create an Asian Union. The CPC and the CFR look like in settlement on the proper “pole.”
Although nation-states supposedly stay “sovereign,” the EU-pole exerts “energy over its members”—constituent governments. This CFR argument is self-contradictory nonsense. The governments of nation-states can’t probably be each “sovereign” and, on the identical time, subservient to the management of their “pole.” It’s unconscionable to think about that the CFR analysts don’t admire this level. What they provide is MWO propaganda.
The entire level of the regional “pole,” or “union,” is to behave as a very pointless “intermediar[y] between worldwide or international establishments and [. . .] governments.” The CFR defines “worldwide or international establishments” because the UN, its specialised businesses, and teams just like the Worldwide Financial Fund and the the G20 (Group of Twenty).
We’ve got simply mentioned the G20 International smart-city Alliance. It embraces stakeholder capitalism, the place governments and their personal sector companions “make choices collectively [to] repurpose metropolis belongings for the deployment of digital infrastructure.” Given the UN dedication to international governance the place “town predominates,” the discernable nature of the actual “Orbital Authority” is materializing.
Governments which are purposeful oligarchies (see Half 1) are being subsumed into regional poles inside a Multipolar World Order that has been actively sought by generations of globalist oligarchs. The poles will empower public-private “worldwide organisations”—dominated by personal capital (oligarchs)—to set coverage for the regional pole’s member state, thereby eradicating any significant expression of nationwide sovereignty. Concurrently, privately financed smart-city “zones” are being carved out of nation-states as international governance strikes towards “collective metropolis decision-making throughout nationwide borders.”
Curtis Yarvin’s “Orbital Authority” was a metaphor, however there may be nothing metaphorical concerning the deliberate, oligarch-led transformation of our world. What they’re setting up mirrors the “patchwork” of community states—gov-corp Technates—proposed by the NRx technocrats. The intention is the digital enslavement of humanity to the asserted authority of personal capital. Removed from resisting this rising tyranny, governments are willingly hastening the method as a result of they’re purposeful oligarchies.
Understanding the form of feudalistic tyranny they portend, who would ever select to stay in a gov-corp Technate? Sadly, tens of millions of probably the most susceptible folks on earth don’t have a lot alternative concerning the place they stay and designers of the gov-corp Technates are targetting them to be amongst their first “clients.”
Orbital Authority Over Refugees
In 2025, the UN Excessive Fee for Refugees (UNHCR) reported that refugee migration in 2024 was “pushed by battle, persecution, human rights violations, and instability.” Refugees fled man-made warfare zones, man-made financial destruction, and man-made persecution—overwhelmingly from nations within the co-called International South—however there isn’t a signal of individuals fleeing any local weather disaster, anthropogenic or in any other case.
In fact, folks have to flee pure disasters equivalent to floods and forest fires. However there isn’t a proof of any upward development in both the frequency or severity of climate associated pure disasters. Once more, all too typically, we discover that the deadly scale of, for instance, catastrophic flooding, although undoubtedly attributable to excessive climate occasions, is exacerbated by very poor planning choices. However, because the UNHCR experiences, local weather change will not be a driver of mass migration.
But, the UN and its companions always discuss with refugees as largely escaping the “local weather disaster.” As there are not any local weather refugees, the core PR message on the contrary is designed to supposedly justify and facilitate the worldwide governance agenda— the Sustainable Improvement Targets (SDGs). That there isn’t a proof of any local weather disaster is irrelevant. Our collective perception within the propaganda is all that issues.
Again in 2018, shortly earlier than the UN adopted the International Compact on Migration, on the annual UN convened Mayoral Discussion board on Human Mobility, Migration and Improvement, civic leaders from eighty cities fashioned the UN’s Mayors Migration Council (MMC). The MMC is a sponsored mission of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors that goals to make “a tangible distinction within the lives of city migrants, displaced folks, and receiving communities worldwide.” It additional proclaims that it “accelerates formidable international motion on migration and displacement to create a world the place city migrants, displaced folks, and receiving communities can thrive.”
NRx technocrat accelerationism (see Half 1) is now enmeshed in all ranges of worldwide governance. Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors overtly declares that its “mission is to speed up philanthropy in pursuit of a simply world by offering deep international experience.” It’s straightforward to think about that the ever present use of the time period “speed up,” or variations thereof, is only a reflection of in vogue terminology, however it’s omnipresent and we might be naive to miss its ideological significance.
The UN outlines its objective in its related International Compact:
Our Ambition is to: Speed up and scale the worldwide collective influence of enterprise by [. . .] delivering the SDGs by way of accountable corporations and ecosystems that allow change.
To this finish, the UN provides:
The United Nations International Compact is main Accelerators to embed SDG-aligned practices deep into enterprise operations and throughout the worth chain to speed up progress and influence for the 2030 Agenda. Out there to collaborating corporations of the UN International Compact, the Accelerators are run in shut collaboration with International Compact Nation Networks and are designed with a view to producing habits change throughout a lot of corporations on the native stage – attaining most influence and scale.
The UN’s International Compact is a supposedly “non-binding” coverage agenda, first adopted by the United Nations in 2000. The Compact will not be targeted on intergovernmental cooperation and has nearly nothing to do with nation-states. The UN describes it as “the world’s largest company sustainability mission.”
Agenda 21 can be a non-binding “plan of motion” that, in 1992, laid the foundations for the worldwide sustainable improvement. The Agenda 21 international coverage agenda has formed the lives of practically everybody on earth in subsequent years. The UN coordinates coverage globally and calling its coverage agendas “non-binding” is meaningless if the general public sector and the personal sector rigidly adhere to them.
The UN is decided to create “international governance through which town predominates.” Consequently, the MMC has been empowered by the UN to “affect coverage choices on the nationwide and worldwide stage.” As NRx technocrat accelerationism pervades just about all the things the UN does, the MMC says that it “accelerates international motion on migration and displacement.”
The MMC has established job forces with different city-state networks, C40 for instance, to handle the migration attributable to the local weather disaster, no matter the truth that the UN concedes there are not any local weather refugees. As well as, so far as the MMC is anxious, worldwide relations based mostly on Westphalian sovereignty is a “damaged system” and it has subsequently created the monetary pathway for traders to instantly fund city-state plans for refugees.
The MMC’s International Cities Fund for Migrants and Refugees is ready to remodel the damaged system by instantly funding city-states. The Cities Fund provides worldwide donors an funding “pipeline” to bypass nationwide governments and instantly channel “worldwide assets to metropolis governments.” That is to allow “metropolis governments and their native companions to implement initiatives of their very own design.”
The main target of the funding is to assist “metropolis governments” to handle “their migrant and displaced communities.” The funding pipeline will create a “a market of city-led options” and the explanation for all of that is to make sure the UN’s “International Compacts for Migration” is applied.
The UN claims that its International Compact on Migration (GCM) is grounded within the “values of state sovereignty.” As now we have simply mentioned, there may be scant proof of that. As a substitute, the International Compact seeks to use a “widespread method to worldwide migration in all its dimensions.”
These dimensions are encapsulated within the twenty-three GCM Goals. The primary Goal is to reap as a lot information as attainable from refugees and financial migrants. The third is to develop methods for the sharing of that information with stakeholders. This accompanies Goal 4, which seeks to drive “all migrants [to] have proof of authorized id,” by which the UN means digital ID. On the metropolis or “municipal” stage, the UN desires to make use of migrants to implement digital ID as a way of exclusion:
Construct upon current practices on the native stage that facilitate participation in group life, equivalent to interplay with authorities and entry to related companies, by way of the issuance of registration playing cards to all individuals residing in a municipality, together with migrants, that comprise primary private data.
That’s to say, everybody’s “participation in group life” and everybody’s entry to companies will likely be contingent on you having a UN-approved, suitable digital ID.
As now we have repeatedlydiscussed, the UN’s personal analysis clearly reveals that there isn’t a local weather crisis-related immigration. Goal 2 is targeted upon “minimising the drivers” of migration flows however identifies nearly none however the alleged migration impacts of the so-called local weather disaster.
Of the twelve clauses to Goal 2, only one briefly mentions “battle” however solely to the extent of “making an allowance for related suggestions from State-led consultative processes, such because the Tips to Shield Migrants in International locations Experiencing Battle.” Regardless of realizing full effectively that individuals must flee from warfare, persecution, and poverty, not local weather change, the UN’s GCM, supposedly designed to help the dispossessed and probably the most susceptible refugees, has virtually nothing to say about tackling any of the precise underlying causes of their plight.
Even goal 7, to “scale back vulnerabilities in migration,” says nothing about persecution, impoverishment, or battle. As a substitute it insists upon offering refugees with “identification,” presumably as a result of humanitarian help merely can’t be supplied in any other case. Refugee kids ought to be added to nationwide id methods and “stakeholders” ought to be totally engaged within the little one’s identification course of.
The unmistakable objective of the UN’s GCM “Goals” is to take advantage of immigration to cement the UN’s international governance agenda. That is starkly highlighted by “Goal 19: Create situations for migrants and diasporas to completely contribute to sustainable improvement in all nations.”
The UN desires to “harness the advantages of migration as a supply of sustainable improvement.” The principle objective is to:
Guarantee the complete and efficient implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Improvement [. . .] by fostering and facilitating the optimistic results of migration for the belief of all Sustainable Improvement Targets
The UN’s marked lack of any real concern for the predicament of refugees is unhealthy sufficient however, after we then contemplate who it chooses as its “companions” to help with its deliberate migration, the truth that dawns is abdomen churning.
Refugee Gov-Corp Technates
Titus Gebel is the previous Chairman of the Board of the Patri Friedman’s Seasteading Institute—a joint mission between Peter Thiel and Friedman—and a accomplice at NeWay Capital. He’s the founding father of Tipolis Inc and a number one investor in and authorized advisor to Próspera, having beforehand acted as a authorized advisor for the Honduran authorities’s authentic ZEDE program (see Half 1).
In 2018, Gebel revealed Free Personal Cities: Making Governments Compete For You. His e book outlines how personal firms—i.e. Yarvin’s sovcorps—can present “authorities as a service.” He advised that clients ought to signal a contract in return for the governance they obtain from their sovcorp. Governance suppliers, in numerous city-states, would compete for purchasers (residents) who can be free to depart, topic to contract, in the event that they didn’t just like the personal authorities service on provide of their zone (gov-corp Technate).
It appears Gebel primarily plagiarised the NRx technocrat’s concepts, first put ahead by Curtis Yarvin and Nick Land a couple of decade earlier than Gebel took credit score for his supposedly “fully new” gov-corp Technate mannequin. Clearly an NRx technocrat, Gebel established Tripolis Inc—within the tax haven of Singapore—with the intention to create new fashions of revolutionary governance. Through Tripolis Inc, Gebel, and his coterie of angel investor companions, hope to turn out to be the “proprietor[s] and operator[s]” of their very own Worldwide Cities:
Worldwide Cities are privately run communities, based mostly on clear contracts, which offer, allow and facilitate alternative and selection. Worldwide Cities will likely be established at a number of places world wide. [. . .] Worldwide Cities construct on the idea of Particular Administrative Areas (SARs) and are the following evolution of Particular Financial Zones (SEZs). [. . .] Worldwide Cities will likely be thriving hubs of enterprise and innovation.
Particular Administrative Areas (SARs) have been formulated by the Chinese language authorities beneath Deng Xiaoping as a part of its “one nation, two methods” coverage. Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan have been legally designated SARs by the Chinese language authorities within the early Eighties. The intention was to supply regulatory autonomy to hopefully reunified territories, although Taiwan has but to decide to reunification. That Gebel considers the bigger SARs as “the following evolution” of SEZs speaks to the territorial ambitions of these pursuing the city-state agenda.
Gebel can be an advisor to the Swiss-based Andan Basis led by its founder Dr Christian H. Kälin (or Kaelin). The Andan Foundations explains its objective:
Andan leads personal sector initiatives to assist households fleeing their houses as a result of warfare, inner battle, and local weather change. It identifies and develops revolutionary, sustainable options. [. . .] Andan prioritizes initiatives that develop financial, monetary, and political alternatives for each refugee populations and the communities that welcome them. Andan facilitates and propels partnerships between the personal sector and UN businesses, governments, NGOs, and educational establishments involved with refugees and migrants.
Andan proposes a enterprise that capitalises on the “alternatives” offered by refugees, asylum seekers and financial migrants. The Basis provides that its “predominant, long-term mission is the Andan Free International Metropolis mission—or “Worldwide Metropolis” as Gebel would name it—which it says has the potential to “fully upend and reform how we cope with the rising international refugee and migration disaster”:
In the present day, the world is spending billions of {dollars} every year in dead-end, protracted refugee administration with camps and concrete settings. [. . .] We intention at a minimum of fully flip round the best way we take a look at refugees and migrants. [. . .] What we’d like is once more a secure harbour, a brand new place the place refugees and different migrants compelled to depart their houses obtain the chance to stay. [. . .] We want free International Cities – autonomous, self-governed subnational entities that present a secure atmosphere. [. . .] We’re additionally actively engaged with a number of governments world wide, in addition to with a couple of main traders who’re ready to finance the institution of the primary free International Metropolis, which can even present an honest return on capital from personal traders.
Kälin, an advisor to the Swiss authorities amongst others, suggests studying a 2022 article by Albert Steck to actually get a really feel for what he, Gebel and different worldwide NRx technocrats are proposing:
[Kälin] sees his Andan International Metropolis not solely as a humanitarian mission, but additionally as a worthwhile enterprise concept. [. . .] In Kälin’s metropolis [refugees] can be motivated staff and founders of companies. [. . .] [Kälin is] in talks with representatives of the U.N. and the World Financial Discussion board. [. . .] The largest problem is discovering a rustic that can present an uninhabited or sparsely populated territory for an autonomous metropolis, he says. [. . .] Initially, a number of tens of 1000’s of individuals may stay there – with the prospect that it would finally turn out to be a metropolis of tens of millions. Personal financing is subsequently essential to the success of such a big mission, says entrepreneur Titus Gebel. [. . .] Gebel, who was born in Germany, can be the founding father of the Free Cities Basis, which works to ascertain particular financial zones in numerous nations, following the instance of Shenzhen in China or the European free cities within the Center Ages.
Like all NRx technocrat fronts, the Andan Basis staunchly advocates digital ID and means that blockchain “has the potential to create new options for refugee and identification methods” and that digital ID, saved on a unified ledger, ought to be “instantly accessible to refugees and immigrants.” As soon as the refugee’s digital twin is operational, the refugees can function “motivated staff” within the Free International Metropolis—gov-corp Technate. Presumably, ought to they be insufficiently motivated, their entry to cash and meals “could possibly be frozen” they usually could possibly be “locked out of all doorways” to important companies till they rediscover the proper motivation.
Christian Kälin can be the Chairman of Henley & Companions, a UK based mostly consultancy that specialises in a profitable enterprise which Kälin claims to have “pioneered.” Henley & Companions touts itself as “the world’s foremost specialists in funding migration and citizenship-by-investment.”
Serving a clientele of “internationally cell entrepreneurs and traders,” Henley & Companions (H&P) says that it helps “high-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth people” to acquire “bespoke residence and citizenship by funding.” Primarily, Kälin and H&P advises “ultra-high-net-worth people”—together with oligarchs—the place to speculate with the intention to purchase residency visas and citizenship after which manages the applying course of for them.
The historical past of “citizenship-by-investment” (CBI) schemes will not be very edifying. For instance, Paolo Zampolli, President Trump’s international envoy for particular partnerships, was evidently concerned in a seemingly corrupt CBI scheme that bought Dominican Republic residency to Chinese language billionaires, equivalent to Ng Lap Seng, who have been beneath investigation by the UN for bribing UN officers. John Ashe, the previous president of the UN Basic Meeting, was additionally suspected of involvement however died in a particularly weird bar-bell “accident” shortly earlier than he was as a result of testify within the case.
Kälin has been dubbed the “Passport King” for his pioneering efforts within the CBI area. Nevertheless, in accordance to US-based Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Mission (OCCRP), H&P has been concerned in quite a few corrupt CBI schemes. As an illustration, within the Caribbean nation of the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis between 2006 and 2013.
The St. Kitts and Nevis Sugar Business Diversification Basis (SIDF) was “arrange in 2006 to maneuver the island economic system away from dependence on sugar.” The SIDF turned agricultural land into improvement land. The acquisition of territory was funded by the federal government and H&P’s “high-net-worth” shoppers searching for residency in St. Kitts and Nevis, lots of whom had prison ties or have been needed in numerous jurisdictions.
Cash from the SIDF fund was then directed to put money into corporations that Kälin was intently related to. H&P insisted there was no battle of curiosity. The SIDF turned inoperative round 2017 and, with essential agricultural land misplaced and no signal of any return on the federal government’s SIDF funding, the OCCRP famous that the “final losers have been the folks of St. Kitts and Nevis.”
Kälin was seemingly the financier behind the Strategic Communications Laboratories Group’s (SCL’s) 2010 re-election marketing campaign for then St. Kitts and Nevis Prime Minister Denzil Douglas. In 2018, an interim UK parliamentary investigatory report issued by the highly effective Digital, Media, Tradition and Sports activities Committee (DMCSC) famous:
211. We have been advised, behind a lot of SCL Elections’ campaigning work was the hidden hand of Christian Kalin, Chairman of Henley and Companions, who organized for traders to produce the funding to pay for campaigns, after which organised SCL to jot down their manifesto and oversee the entire marketing campaign course of. In change [. . .] Henley and Companions would achieve unique passport rights for that nation, beneath a citizenship-by-investment (CBI) programme.[. . .] Christian Kalin [has] been described as having a ‘Faustian pact’. With the unique passport rights got here a authorities that will be conducive to Mr. Kalin and his shoppers.
The British defence contractor SCL is the mum or dad firm of the infamous Cambridge Analytica (CA)that was broadly accused of manipulating the 2016 US presidential elections and the UK “BREXIT” referendum on leaving the European Union (EU). The CA operation additionally illegitimately acquired the information of tens of millions of Fb customers. Therefore, the UK parliamentary investigation.
CA, and thus SCL, is evidently related to Peter Thiel’s Palantir. As CA’s suspected election manipulation, and what was tantamount to information theft, got here beneath worldwide scrutiny, Palantir disavowed that connection. However, when the New York Instances revealed that one in all its staff—Palantir enterprise supervisor Alfredas Chmieliauskas—had labored with CA to kind “behavioural profiles” of voting social media customers, Palantir modified its assertion and mentioned Mr Chmieliauskas was not performing on Palantir’s behalf on the time, although he was a Palantir worker all through the interval.
H&P’s CBI schemes weren’t restricted to the Caribbean. They’ve reportedly been discovered to be wholly corrupt in Cyprus, as an example. When, in 2017, Maltese investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia began to show H&B’s involvement in Malta’s corrupt Particular person Investor Programme (IIP)—Malta’s CBI scheme—subsequent inquiry hearings revealed emails indicating that H&P instigated a Strategic Lawsuits towards Public Participation (SLAPP) towards her. It appears H&P meant to file the lawsuit within the UK as a result of they needed a “sympathetic choose.” Daphne Caruana Galizia, who was additionally instrumental in reporting the Panama Papers, was assassinated in a automotive bombing in Malta in October 2017.
Extra lately, the European Courtroom of Justice (ECJ) has dominated the Maltese CBI scheme unlawful. As an EU member state, a Maltese passport supplied some questionable “ultra-high-income people” with EU citizenship. It’s not with out justification that the ECJ characterised CBI schemes, together with these run by H&B, as making “the acquisition of nationality a mere industrial transaction.”
Kälin, who conceded that some H&B shoppers have been “drawback[s]” who fell by way of H&B’s claimed “due diligence” checks, was undeterred by the ECJ ruling. He was enthused by the worldwide enlargement of CBI schemes and, particularly, the Trump administration’s plan to problem everlasting residency visas to anybody who can afford the $5 million price ticket. If he desires to maneuver to the US, Kälin may definitely afford a US “gold card.”
Fours years earlier, In 2021, quite a few hedge funds confronted potential smash on account of the GameStop brief squeeze. When Reddit customers seen the mass shorting of inventory within the the GameStop chain of high-street shops, they apparently spiked demand for the inventory and pushed the value up by coordinating large-scale inventory purchases. Thus leaving these with brief positions—betting the inventory worth would fall—uncovered to huge losses. By his firm Arnova Capital, Christian Kälin consequently made a fortune on the GameStop inventory his firm held. He additionally precisely predicted, earlier than any WHO announcement of a worldwide pandemic, that vitality costs would soar throughout the pseudopandemic. Kälin’s 2000% ROI on his preliminary funding in Arnova Capital is actually outstanding.
The Andan Basis, based by Kälin and suggested by Gebel, that seeks to revenue from refugee migration by establishing Free International Cities, is a “long-standing” accomplice of the United Nations. The objective of the partnership is to “propel and facilitate the personal sector’s involvement,” in managing worldwide refugee migration with a view to create “private and non-private initiatives that create long-term options for refugees.”
The appalling stench of neocolonialism exudes from each a part of the UN’s international migration coverage agenda. The oligarch-led UN public-private partnership is implementing a technique that goals to take advantage of migrants and refugees to attain UN targets. There isn’t any severe try and do something to deal with the issues that trigger mass migration. The migrant is just a “human useful resource” to be recognized, stamped and relocated into communities the world over with the intention to obtain UN coverage targets.
The UN desires to assemble a world community smart-city gov-corp Technates as a result of that too will higher facilitate the rollout of its international governance; it has fashioned partnerships with NRx technocrats who need to use the displaced as a workforce and who view refugee “residency” of their gov-corp Technates as a “worthwhile enterprise concept;” the UN is supporting and inspiring the nationwide governments at hand over territory to oligarch traders in preparation for its New City Agenda, and the UN desires all lives, together with these of refugees and financial migrants, to be managed by digital expertise linked to the digital ID of their digital twin.
The networks, technological methods, and funding “pipelines” are in place to allow gov-corp Technate ultra-high-net-worth “founders” to purchase citizenship, ought to they want, and arrange gov-corp Technates both by investing in SEZs or smart-city developments already underway. In 2024, the UNHCR estimated that there have been 123.2 million displaced folks searching for refuge. Clearly, NRx technocrats like Titus Gebel and Christian Kälin hope to supply mentioned refuge for a worthwhile return.
Gov-corp Technates in america
In 2023, on the US election marketing campaign path, calling it a “quantum leap,” Donald Trump proposed initially setting up ten “Freedom Cities” within the US. As reported by Bloomberg:
The tip recreation is audacious: Excessive-tech firm cities free from state legislation and most federal guidelines—together with the Inside Income Code, main environmental legal guidelines just like the Clear Water Act and the Endangered Species Act; employee protections just like the Truthful Labor Requirements Act and the Occupational Well being and Security Act; and the Inexpensive Care Act.
There are at the moment round 300 SEZs within the US and the potential for enlargement of the Freedom Metropolis idea within the US is already marked. The Freedom Metropolis concept, although it gives the identical SEZ regulatory benefits to multinational firms, stands aside considerably from different SEZ initiatives. The Freedom Cities will likely be constructed on parcels of US territory sold-off instantly to non-public traders.
Initially, the Trump administration tried to sell-off US territory to oligarchs by way of public land sale provisions included in Trump’s One Massive Lovely Invoice. On account of public and political opposition, the general public land sale clauses have been eliminated previous to the Invoice passing. The NRx technocrats behind the Trump administration are, nonetheless, decided. They’re now making an attempt to make use of Trump’s proposed Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) for a similar objective.
Inherent within the US SWF plan is the intention to liquidate—sell-off—US public land (territory) to boost capital. It stays to be seen if this line of assault will work the place the Massive Lovely Invoice assault failed. There’s a highly effective worldwide community, led by US NRx technocrats, exploring each avenue to get the gov-corp Technates—Freedom Cities—constructed within the US.
Peter Thiel protégé, and an NRx technocrat in his personal proper, Sam Altman, stood near Oracle’s Larry Ellison, SoftBank’s Masayoshi Son and President Trump when Trump introduced his administration’s Stargate Mission.
In accordance with Altman’s OpenAI:
The Stargate Mission is a brand new firm which intends to speculate $500 billion over the following 4 years constructing new AI infrastructure for OpenAI in america. [. . .] The preliminary fairness funders in Stargate are SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX. SoftBank and OpenAI are the lead companions for Stargate, with SoftBank having monetary accountability and OpenAI having operational accountability. Masayoshi Son would be the chairman. Arm, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Oracle, and OpenAI are the important thing preliminary expertise companions. [. . .] All of us sit up for persevering with to construct and develop AI—and particularly AGI [artificial generative intelligence]—for the advantage of all of humanity. We imagine that this new step is important on the trail, and can allow artistic folks to determine how one can use AI to raise humanity.
“All of us” refers back to the international NRx technocrat group of which Sam Altman, Larry Ellison, and Masayoshi Son (Masayoshi Yasumoto) are members. The intention to make use of AI to “elevate humanity” means to meld us with expertise and switch is into programmable “technoplastic beings.”
Masayoshi Son is the pinnacle of the expertise funding holding firm SoftBank Group (SBG) which has capitalised handsomely on its investments in Chinese language expertise companies equivalent to Alibaba. That is largely as a result of its management of the Chinese language social media agency TikTok, ByteDance, the biggest social media firm on the planet by income, is at the moment valued at round $330 billion. This makes SoftBank’s 4% stake in ByteDance value roughly $13.2 billion.
It stays to be seen if Larry Ellison’s $14 billion deal to purchase out ByteDance’ stake in TikTok’s US operation will assist Masayoshi Son’s to extend his ByteDance holdings. Definitely, it ought to present him with a wholesome dividend. Trump has spoken about “4 or 5 world-class traders” benefiting from the deal, however each he and Ellison have been coy about formally naming them.
Mission Stargate was launched to a lot fanfare, consistent with the rhetoric within the Heritage Basis’s Mission 2025, because the US was supposedly set on a course to outcompete China’s DeepSeek AI improvement program, which is vital to the Hangzhou Metropolis-Mind mission. Nearer scrutiny of Stargate, nonetheless, brings the entire notion of competitors into query.
Previous to the Stargate launch, in September 2024, Blackrock, its owned subsidiary International Infrastructure Companions (GIP), Microsoft, and MGX introduced their International AI Infrastructure Funding Partnership (GAIIP) to to gasoline AI innovation. This was a worldwide enterprise however there was a deal with supporting AI innovation within the US. The GAIIP implementing companions included NVIDIA.
As a founding member of GAIIP, UAE-based AI investor MGX can be a “lead accomplice” in Stargate. MGX is owned by the sovereign wealth fund (Mubadala) of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi dominated by former UAE president Sheik Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. Shortly after the January 2025 launch of Stargate, in February, Sam Altman visited Abu Dhabi to debate finance for Stargate with MGX. This resulted in an preliminary, accelerated $6.6 billion Stargate start-up funding spherical.
BlackRock, and notably its GIP, obtain billions of {dollars} of personal fairness funding from China’s state-run funding arms such because the State Administration of Overseas Belongings and the China Funding Company (CIC). As Trump ramped up his allegedly powerful aggressive stance towards China, by April 2025 the Chinese language financiers have been pulling again on their huge US personal fairness commitments. Likely, this was a lot to the chagrin of Blackrock, MGX and different GAIIP companions.
DeepSeek AI builders in China have been reliant on the US-based multinational NVIDIA’s H20 processors that are manufactured beneath license in Taiwan. NVIDIA is a “key expertise accomplice” of Stargate. Having initially “banned” H20 gross sales to China, reportedly following some conferences with Jensen Huang—co-founder and CEO of GAIIP accomplice NVIDIA—the Trump administration began lifting the H20 export ban, roughly as quickly because it had been imposed, in April 2025. This later turned the official place as, it appears, the preliminary ban was a mistake.
In Might 2025, Trump was dispatched to Abu Dhabi the place he signed a deal to produce US AI-chips, together with NVIDIA processors, to the Abu Dhabi AI digital transformation hub. An related settlement was made for US tech companies to collaborate on AI improvement within the Emirate and the broader UAE. Trump known as the deal the “U.S.-U.A.E. A.I. Acceleration Partnership.”
In what was clearly a deal sweetener, simply a few weeks previous to the Trump-UAE deal, Steve Witkoff, Trump’s Center East envoy, met Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Sardinia. Sheik Tahnoon is the Abu Dhabi Emir’s brother, UAE Nationwide Safety Advisor, and CEO of MGX (Mubadala). Sheik Tahnoon agreed to make investments $2 billion in World Liberty Monetary, a cryptocurrency enterprise owned by the Witkoff and Trump households.
Although this appears to be like like blatant corruption, the official fact-checkers have declared all the things unimpeachable and have outlined the reality for us. Any solutions that this chain of occasions clearly evidences excessive stage political corruption have all been formally labelled as “baseless rumours.”
Reality-checking heavyweight Snopes reliably knowledgeable us:
Whereas the 2 offers occurred inside two weeks and there was an overlap of people that have been concerned in them, there was no proof the primary, between MGX and World Liberty Monetary, was a direct bribe for the second deal, which concerned the chips.
So, fortunately, the accredited fact-checkers have answered all of our questions for us and that’s an finish to the matter.
Within the media-spun confrontation, and that’s evidently all it’s, China has now reportedly banned the import of the NVIDIA RTX Professional 6000D—the successor to the H20. However China doesn’t must import processors from the US as a result of the UAE-China AI partnership, particularly the Abu Dhabi digital transformation hub, has a Trump administration settlement in place for the provision of the processors and it serves as a “essential base for Chinese language AI companies.”
The purported Stargate “competitors” with DeepSeek AI appears to be like extra like a “partnership.” So what else is perhaps happening right here?
When Forbes reported the launch of Stargate on January 2025, its journalists mentioned the “particulars of the enterprise are unclear at this early stage.” Why they made this declare is perplexing. The small print weren’t unclear. In November 2024, Sam Altman’s OpenAI, the driving drive behind Stargate, introduced its “blueprint for U.S. AI infrastructure.”
AI in America: OpenAI’s Financial Blueprint, is Stargate mapped out. This was revealed earlier than the official White Home Stargate announcement and there was no want for any journalist to be “unclear” about any side of it.
The “Blueprint” talks about the necessity to merge “private-sector imaginative and prescient and innovation with public-sector enlightenment to unlock the brand new expertise;” a plan for “constructing the infrastructure wanted to provide sufficient vitality;” funding to develop “the following era of vitality expertise, together with sustainable sources equivalent to fission, fusion, and different promising applied sciences;” and it notes the necessity for “common sense guidelines” to assist “innovators thrive by encouraging funding [. . .] and larger freedom.”
The NRx technocrat “Blueprint” additionally defines the alleged want for Freedom Cities:
We want a foundational technique to make sure that funding in infrastructure advantages the most individuals attainable and maximizes entry to AI. This consists of insurance policies and initiatives that encourage quite than stifle builders; assist a thriving AI-ready workforce and ecosystems of labs, start-ups and bigger corporations; and safe America’s management on AI into the long run, equivalent to:
AI Financial Zones, created by native, state and the federal authorities along with trade, that considerably pace up the allowing processes for constructing AI infrastructure like new photo voltaic arrays, wind farms and nuclear reactors.
These will likely be what Bloomberg calls “cities free from state legislation and most federal guidelines.” Simply because the plan for Freedom Cities within the US preceded Stargate, the UK’s cope with Blackrock to develop “freeports” within the UK (see Half 1) had preceded the rollout of the NRx technocrats’ UK Stargate mission. It’s the identical NRx technocrat community imposing the identical SEZ-based unbiased jurisdiction mannequin wherever you look.
Mark Lutter, for instance, serves on the board of the Frontier Basis that was set as much as promote the Freedom Metropolis initiative within the US. As we mentioned in Half 1, Lutter can be the founder and Govt Director of the Constitution Cities Institute which states it’s proud to assist the event of Freedom Cities within the US.Titus Gebel, who desires to revenue from migrants and refugees, works intently with Lutter. As beforehand famous, Lutter served as the pinnacle economist for NeWAY Capital and Gebel is a NeWay Capital Accomplice.
Nick Allen, President of the Frontier Basis and Lutter’s colleague, could be very keen to utilize Trump’s SWF grift and advisedWIREDthat federal land near cities like Boise, Idaho; Grand Junction, Colorado; and Redmond, Oregon can be nice locations to construct gov-corp Technates.
Talking on behalf of the Frontier Basis, Allen added:
If we’re in a position to get a legislative switch of land from the US authorities to make a public-private partnership, or a belief, or perhaps a personal company, then it’s a decrease price of capital. [. . .] There’s a lot capital and there’s a lot political will, however but there’s an incapacity to develop these [frontier] applied sciences. And the lack comes from lack of house and too many laws.
NeWay capital established the Freedom Cities Coalition (FCC) which promotes the concept of Freedom Cities as “Cities With out Limits.” This implies cities and cities the place there are not any regulation and oligarchs are free to do what they please. Along with NeWay Capital, the FCC can be backed by Pronomos Capital led by NRx Technocrats Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen, and Joe Lonsdale.
The FCC claims that Freedom Cities or, in Stargate terminology, “AI Financial Zones,” symbolize “America’s boldest resolution to unleash our nation’s full potential.” They are going to be constructed in “zones of regulatory readability” which will likely be “specifically designated areas” the place “entrepreneurs” can “transfer on the pace of human ingenuity” with out having to trouble with any overbearing federal legal guidelines or laws.
The FCC provides:
Freedom Cities are extra than simply financial zones. [. . .] Think about communities the place housing is ample and inexpensive, [. . .] the place breakthrough applied sciences transfer from lab to market at lightning pace as a result of innovators are free to innovate. That is how we’ll overcome stagnation, outcompete China, and create a brand new American century. Freedom Cities give us the prospect to show as soon as once more what Individuals can obtain after we’re unshackled from outdated methods and empowered to construct the long run.
With regard to the place the Freedom Cities will likely be constructed, the FCC notes:
28% Of US land is federally owned and prepared for revolutionary improvement.
If the Trump administration’s SWF plans proceed, this may open the door for NRx technocrats and different oligarchs to purchase up US territory to construct their gov-corp Technates. The political will definitely seems to be there.
Trump’s long-time financial advisor Stephen Moore helps the city-state mannequin. Moore is the previous chief economist on the Heritage Basis, which was behind Mission 2025’s Promise to America.
The Trump administration got here to energy promising to deal with the pernicious affect of “American elites” and was subsequently wanting to distance itself from the Heritage Basis’s Mission 2025 “Promise,” which was funded by the Koch and Bradley households, amongst different so-called American elites. Regardless, most of Trump’s Govt Orders, issued when he got here to energy for the second time, have been virtually written by the Heritage Basis’s Mission 2025.
The identical group of American elites are additionally behind the State Coverage Community (SPN) that proposed the “Compact For America” shortly earlier than Trump’s first US election win in 2016. What Trump termed Freedom Cities in 2023, the Compact for America, whose Nationwide Spokesman was Stephen Moore, known as Prosperity Districts in 2015. The terminology has modified, however the intention to create gov-corp Technates within the US has not.
As we mentioned in Half 1, simply because the “authority” is fashioned to supervise the unbiased jurisdiction of a Particular Financial Zone (SEZ), so the Prosperity District (PD) can be the authority that guidelines throughout the jurisdictional boundaries permitted by amenable “Prosperity States” throughout the US.
As soon as accredited, the PD would wield policing powers, it will management all “municipal companies” by way of public-private partnerships, and set all laws inside its jurisdiction. Simply as with the “authority” ruling an SEZ, the PD would develop by petitioning the prepared State to develop itself:
The formation or enlargement of the PD replaces, inside its boundaries, all state legal guidelines above the baseline of the state structure, widespread legislation, prison legislation and current compacts. The PDs created inside Prosperity States liberate residents, remodeling states into strongholds of free markets, federalism and restricted authorities as soon as once more.
Protected to say, Trump didn’t give you the notion of the Freedom Metropolis. It’s merely the rebranding for the oligarchs’ Prosperity District concept. The gov-corp Technate has been the NRx technocrat’s favoured path to company “prosperity” and social management for greater than a decade at this level.
Throughout its first time period, the Trump administration tried to place Stephen Moore on the board of the Federal Reserve to make sure beneficial financial coverage suited to the formation of Prosperity Districts. The Democratic wing of the Institution reacted strongly towards Moore’s attainable appointment and the bid didn’t succeed. With their second Trump time period underway, the NRx Technocrats—the Silicon Valley-based new breed of American elites—have joined forces with their extra conventional oligarch companions for a similar ends: to construct Freedom Cities, Prosperity Districts, SEZs, gov-corp Technates, name them what you want.
The US intelligence group can be onboard. This isn’t stunning on condition that NRx technocrat’s firms, equivalent to Peter Thiel’s Palantir and Larry Ellison’s Oracle, have deep ties with US intelligence.
America’s Frontier Fund (AFF), is a supposedly a “nonprofit” enterprise capital operation with a nonprofit basis, backed by Bilderbergers Eric Schmidt and Peter Thiel. The AFF is actually an influence funding cut-out of the US intelligence and nationwide safety equipment. It was based and is at the moment led by Gilman Louie. He’s the “former” CEO of the CIA’s funding arm In-Q-Tel (1999 – 2006) and thereafter acted as a defence, nationwide safety and intelligence advisor for the US authorities. Notably, Louie was on the helm of In-Q-Tel when it “accelerated” the startup known as Palantir.
The AFF’s intention is to harness the “promise of frontier expertise.” This is identical “frontier expertise” that the UN’s “New City Agenda” is predicated upon, with a view of setting up sensible city-states the world over. It’s not a coincidence that it’s also exactly the identical “frontier expertise” that the NRx technocrats behind the AFF need to use to enslave humanity. It’s, in any case, a part of the identical, international gov-corp Technate plan.
The worldwide agenda, shifting us towards digital slavery, is impregnable and isn’t one thing any of us can vote are means out of. Our solely practical choice is to not adjust to the adoption of the “sensible” frontier expertise folks like Gilman Louie, and his intelligence linked community of NRx technocrats need us to undertake.
This whole, international, gov-corp Technate mission couldn’t be extra anti-democratic. The Darkish Enlightenment and the Technocracy favoured by the NRx technocrats symbolize the zenith of totalitarian ideology. Their oligarch companions enthusiasm to undertake the identical Patchwork of city-states is equally born from the need to regulate everybody and all the things.
Schmidt, Thiel, and Louie have been instrumental in organising the AFF beneath the earlier Biden administration. It could be a mistake to think about the worldwide agenda to entrap us in sensible city-states is a partisan problem. The squabbles we see, equivalent to Democrat opposition to the appointment of Moore to the Fed, are simply that: petty squabbles among the many ranks.
In 2024, the Future Union, which seeks to “fuse personal sector capitalism” with political authority, declared Gilman Louie the “high investor supporting democracy.” Louie narrowly pipped different egalitarian, democracy-loving NRx technocrat traders, like Peter Thiel, Eric Shmidt, and Marc Andreessen, to the highest prize. Had been the intention of their accelerationist funding methods not so malevolent we may maybe snort on the irony.
