When YouTuber Jimmy Donaldson, higher often known as MrBeast, launched his newest video, he known as it his “most bold mission but.” Touring throughout continents, he and his group rescued greater than 1,000 animals — from lions and rhinos to canine and turtles — in a whirlwind of veterinary missions, relocations, and sanctuary partnerships, Hindustan Occasions reviews.
The 17-minute video, titled *“I Saved 1,000 Animals From Dying,”* begins in Africa, the place MrBeast assists veterinarians performing a root canal on a lion affected by a extreme an infection.
“If we don’t repair this, he might actually die,” he says, because the lion lies sedated on an working desk.
From there, the group tranquilizes and relocates overcrowded rhinos and makes use of air rifles to vaccinate giraffes from a helicopter — “sniping giraffes to avoid wasting their lives,” he jokes within the video.
Photograph: Wikimedia Commons / 小Lin说, License: CC BY 3.0
MrBeast’s new video claims to have saved greater than 1,000 animals worldwide.
From Battle Zones to Shelters
The rescue operation stretches far past Africa. In Ukraine, MrBeast’s group helps evacuate zoo animals trapped in war-damaged enclosures, flying them to security in South Africa. Within the U.S., they help greater than 100 shelter canine to find properties, purchase miniature horses from slaughter auctions, and rehabilitate injured wildlife comparable to birds, deer, and turtles.
He additionally stops by Alveus Sanctuary in Texas, run by streamer Maya Higa, to rebuild after flooding and donates $50,000 towards its animal care packages.
“We saved 1,000 animals, however our work isn’t achieved but,” MrBeast says in closing — a line that has shortly grow to be a rallying cry amongst followers who flooded social media with reward for his philanthropy.

Photograph: Wikimedia Commons / Fidias, License: CC BY 3.0
he YouTuber’s rescue efforts embody lions, rhinos, giraffes, canine, and turtles.
Critics Query Animal Welfare in His Content material
But not everyone seems to be celebrating. Some animal welfare organizations argue that MrBeast’s involvement with wild animals blurs the road between advocacy and leisure. Earlier this 12 months, international animal welfare group FOUR PAWS criticized a separate video wherein MrBeast featured elephants portray and cheetahs racing in opposition to automobiles — challenges they described as “weird” and “unnatural.”
“When do you see a wild elephant portray with a brush? By no means,” stated Vanessa Amoroso, who leads the group’s ‘Animals Abused in Leisure and Work’ initiative. “Creators like MrBeast have the ability to drive actual and optimistic change, however they need to use that attain responsibly — selling compassion as a substitute of clicks.”
FOUR PAWS emphasised that reliable sanctuaries by no means enable bodily interplay between guests and animals, warning that such content material can normalize dangerous practices.

Photograph: Wikimedia Commons / Steven Khan, License: CC BY 4.0
MrBeast’s group as soon as carried out a root canal on a lion affected by an an infection.
PETA Weighs In
The controversy resurfaced months later when MrBeast teased a hypothetical “100 Males vs. a Gorilla” video — a viral web joke that prompted backlash from PETA.
The group urged the YouTuber to “depart animals out of your content material,” responding to his tweet with, “Perhaps strive 100 causes to go away animals out of your content material as a substitute.”
Whereas MrBeast’s animal rescue mission drew applause for its scope and funding, animal rights advocates stay cautious of his sample of that includes unique species in high-production movies. They argue that even well-intentioned content material dangers decreasing sentient beings to leisure props.
The Divide Between Good Intentions and Moral Boundaries
MrBeast’s international rescue mission undeniably funneled consideration — and cash — towards animal welfare. However his critics say that the identical platform able to mobilizing thousands and thousands might additionally perpetuate exploitative portrayals if used carelessly.
For some, his viral animal movies signify a robust name to motion. For others, they mark the skinny line between compassion and commodification.
