By Shalina Chatlani, Stateline.org
As a part of its deportation efforts, the Trump administration has ordered states at hand over private information from voter rolls, driver’s license data and packages corresponding to Medicaid and meals stamps.
On the similar time, the administration is attempting to consolidate the bits of private information held throughout federal businesses, making a single trove of knowledge on individuals who reside in america.
Many left-leaning states and cities are attempting to guard their residents’ private data amid the immigration crackdown. However a rising variety of conservative lawmakers additionally need to curb the usage of surveillance applied sciences, corresponding to automated license plate readers, that can be utilized to establish and monitor individuals.
Conservative-led states corresponding to Arkansas, Idaho and Montana enacted legal guidelines final 12 months designed to guard the non-public information collected via license plate readers and different means. They joined no less than 5 left-leaning states — Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York and Washington — that particularly blocked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from accessing their driver’s license data.
As well as, Democratic-led cities in Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Texas and Washington final 12 months terminated their contracts with Flock Security, the largest supplier of license plate readers within the U.S.
The Trump administration’s objective is to create a “surveillance dragnet throughout the nation,” stated William Owen, communications director on the Surveillance Know-how Oversight Mission, a nonprofit that advocates for stronger privateness legal guidelines.
“We’re getting into an more and more dystopian period of high-tech surveillance,” Owen stated. Intelligence sharing between numerous ranges of presidency, he stated, has “allowed ICE to sidestep sanctuary legal guidelines and co-opt native police databases and surveillance instruments, together with license plate readers, facial recognition and different applied sciences.”
A brand new Montana regulation bars authorities entities from accessing digital communications and associated materials with out a warrant. Republican state Sen. Daniel Emrich, the regulation’s creator, stated “an important factor that our complete justice system relies on is the precept in opposition to illegal search and seizure” — the precise enshrined within the Fourth Modification to the U.S. Structure.
“It’s robust to seek out people who’re constitutionally grounded and perceive the need of maintaining the Fourth Modification rights intact always for all causes — with minimal or zero exceptions,” Emrich stated in an interview.
ICE didn’t reply to Stateline’s requests for remark.
Automated license plate readers
Just lately, cities and states have grown significantly involved over the usage of automated license plate readers (ALPRs), that are high-speed digicam and pc techniques that seize license plate data on automobiles that drive by. These readers sit on high of police vehicles and streetlights or will be hidden inside building barrels and utility poles.
Some cameras acquire information that will get saved in databases for years, elevating considerations amongst privateness advocates. One report from the Brennan Middle for Justice, a progressive suppose tank at New York College, discovered the information will be inclined to hacking. Totally different businesses have various insurance policies on how lengthy they preserve the information, in accordance to the Worldwide Affiliation of Chiefs of Police, a regulation enforcement advocacy group.
Supporters of the expertise, together with many in regulation enforcement, say the expertise is a robust device for monitoring down prison suspects.
Flock Security says it has cameras in additional than 5,000 communities and is related to greater than 4,800 regulation enforcement businesses throughout 49 states. The corporate claims its cameras conduct greater than 20 billion license plate reads a month. It collects the information and provides it to police departments, which use the knowledge to find individuals.
Holly Beilin, a spokesperson for Flock Security, instructed Stateline that whereas there are native police businesses that could be working with ICE, the corporate doesn’t have a contractual relationship with the company. Beilin additionally stated that many liberal and even sanctuary cities proceed to signal contracts with Flock Security. She famous that the cameras have been used to resolve some high-profile crimes, together with figuring out and main police to the person who dedicated the Brown College taking pictures and killed an MIT professor on the finish of final 12 months.
“Businesses and cities are very a lot ready to make use of this expertise in a manner that complies with their values. So they don’t have to share information out of state,” Beilin stated.
Pushback over information’s use
However critics, such because the American Civil Liberties Union, say that Flock Security’s cameras should not solely “giving even the smallest-town police chief entry to an enormously highly effective driver-surveillance device,” but additionally that the information is being utilized by ICE. One information outlet, 404 Media, obtained data of those searches and located many had been being carried out by native officers on behalf of ICE.
Final spring, the Denver Metropolis Council unanimously voted to terminate its contract with Flock Security, however Democratic Mayor Mike Johnston unilaterally prolonged the contract in October, arguing that the expertise was a helpful crime-fighting device.
The ACLU of Colorado has vehemently opposed the cameras, saying final August that audit logs from the Denver Police Division present greater than 1,400 searches had been performed for ICE since June 2024.
“The dialog has actually gotten larger due to the federal panorama and the main target, not solely on immigrants and the performance of ICE proper now, but additionally on the facet of actually attempting to scale back and or remove protections with regard to entry to reproductive care and gender affirming care,” Anaya Robinson, public coverage director on the ACLU of Colorado.
“After we erode rights and entry for a selected group, it’s only a matter of time earlier than that erosion begins to the touch different communities.”
Jimmy Monto, a Democratic metropolis councilor in Syracuse, New York, led the cost to remove Flock Security’s contract in his metropolis.
“Syracuse has a really giant immigrant inhabitants, a really giant new American inhabitants, refugees which have resettled and been resettled right here. So it’s a really delicate difficulty,” Monto stated, including that license plate readers permit anybody reviewing the information to find out somebody’s immigration standing with out a warrant.
“After we signal a contract with somebody who’s gathering information on the residents who reside in a metropolis, now we have to be hyper-focused on precisely what they’re doing whereas we’re additionally giving police departments the instruments that they should additionally remedy homicides, proper?” Monto stated.
“Actually, if license plate readers are useful in that manner, I believe the scope is true. However now we have to be sure that that’s what we’re utilizing it for, and that the businesses that we’re contracting with are performing in good religion.”
Emrich, the Montana lawmaker, stated everybody ought to be involved about defending constitutional privateness rights, no matter their political beliefs.
“If the federal government is acquiring information in violation of constitutional rights, they may very well be violating a complete slew of people’ constitutional rights in pursuit of the people who might or is probably not protected underneath those self same constitutional rights,” he stated.
Stateline reporter Shalina Chatlani will be reached at schatlani@stateline.org.
©2026 States Newsroom. Go to at stateline.org. Distributed by Tribune Content material Company, LLC.
