Neuralink’s Bid to Trademark ‘Telepathy’ and ‘Telekinesis’ Faces Authorized Points

America Patent and Trademark Workplace has rejected Neuralink’s try to trademark the product names Telepathy and Telekinesis, citing pending purposes by one other individual for a similar logos.

Neuralink, the mind implant firm cofounded by Elon Musk, filed to trademark the names in March. However in letters despatched to Neuralink in August, the trademark workplace is refusing to permit the purposes to maneuver ahead. It says Wesley Berry, a pc scientist and a cofounder of the tech startup Prophetic, beforehand filed trademark purposes for Telepathy in Might 2023 and Telekinesis in August 2024. Prophetic is constructing a wearable headset to induce lucid dreaming, however solely Berry is the writer of the trademark purposes, not Prophetic. (Berry declined to remark for this story.)

In response to Neuralink’s utility for Telepathy, the trademark workplace additionally references the prevailing trademark for Telepathy Labs, a Tampa-based firm that gives interactive voice and chatbot know-how to companies.

Musk’s Neuralink, in the meantime, is growing a brain-computer interface that includes a tool, surgically implanted within the cranium, that collects mind exercise. The corporate has been utilizing the identify Telepathy to explain its first product, which is designed to permit paralyzed folks the flexibility to function their telephones and computer systems with simply their ideas. Musk unveiled the Telepathy identify in a January 2024 social media put up, shortly after the corporate implanted its first volunteer with the know-how. A complete of 9 folks now have the Neuralink machine, based on a July announcement. (Neuralink didn’t reply to a request for remark.)

Each Berry and Neuralink filed “intent-to-use” purposes, which permit companies and inventors to order trademark rights earlier than utilizing the mark in commerce. Berry’s utility for Telepathy was accepted in December 2024 and for Telekinesis in August 2025 however the logos aren’t totally registered till he reveals that he’s truly utilizing them in commerce. Berry has three years to do this from acceptance, in any other case his purposes can be thought-about deserted and Neuralink’s utility would take precedence.

Berry has not marketed nor commercialized a product known as Telepathy or Telekinesis, however in his trademark purposes describes each as “software program that analyzes EEG to decode inside dialogue to regulate pc or cellular gadgets.” EEG, or electroencephalogram, knowledge refers back to the electrical exercise of the mind recorded by way of electrodes worn on the scalp.

The trademark workplace’s letters to Neuralink aren’t closing selections. Neuralink filed a response letter on August 28 addressing the prevailing Telepathy Labs trademark, saying that Neuralink’s Telepathy product isn’t prone to be confused with Telepathy Labs. Neuralink didn’t handle Berry’s purposes in its response.

“The usual for chance of confusion is, if a random client encountered each of those merchandise, would they assume that they’re coming from the identical firm?” says Heather Antoine, an mental property accomplice at Stoel Rives in Sacramento, California.

The trademark workplace will think about Neuralink’s response and resolve if there’s a chance of confusion. However there’s nonetheless the truth that Berry filed to register the Telepathy and Telekinesis marks first. If Berry succeeds in registering the marks, Neuralink would have a couple of choices. It may try to purchase the logos from Berry or negotiate a consent settlement, through which Berry may agree to permit Neuralink to additionally use the marks. Most of these agreements are often made when the logos aren’t prone to trigger client confusion.

If Berry is profitable in registering Telepathy, Neuralink may very well be sued if the corporate continues to make use of it.

Josh Gerben, a trademark lawyer and founding father of Gerben IP in Washington, DC, says it’s troublesome to know the way issues will shake out as a result of there’s plenty of nuance to a trademark declare. “Actually in the intervening time, although, benefit goes to this different applicant,” he says, referring to Berry. “He may develop into a substantial thorn within the facet of Neuralink by way of these logos.”