The North Sea has turn into the location of a dwell coverage experiment, showcasing two dramatically totally different approaches to the power transition, with profoundly totally different outcomes.
Whereas Norway, dedicated to internet zero, backs additional exploration, offers long-term regulatory certainty, and cashes in on large oil and fuel revenues, the UK, additionally targeted on internet zero, is actively driving away traders.
This divergence happens in opposition to a backdrop of worldwide oil costs, with Brent crude at $62.68 and WTI at $59.10, being suppressed by financial slowdown worries and OPEC+ persevering with its ramp-up of manufacturing.
But, beneath the bearish sentiment, the long-term want for hydrocarbon provide is plain, highlighted by the OPEC Secretary Common’s current stark warning that the world requires $18.2 trillion in oil and fuel funding to satisfy future demand, a message clearly embraced by Norway, however ignored by the UK.
A Story of Two North Seas
“There’s a large distinction between the 2 nations’ method and it has turn into greater over the previous 5 years,” Tom Erik Kristiansen, an power specialist at Nordic-focused funding financial institution Pareto, advised The Telegraph.
“In Norway, you might have two or three of the largest events agreeing to not contact [the oil and gas industry]. Within the UK it’s rather more celebration political.”
For many years, successive governments in Norway have supported the oil and fuel business and the home provide chain, acknowledging that these create jobs and financial alternatives.
Norway, in contrast to the UK, strongly helps oil and fuel improvement and exploration for undiscovered assets on its shelf, not solely within the North Sea, but in addition within the Norwegian Sea and the Arctic waters within the Barents Sea.
Associated: Egypt is Making a $6 Billion Wager on Crude Oil
The Norwegian authorities has began to plan its twenty sixth oil and fuel licensing spherical in little-explored frontier areas as Norway appears to be like to spice up exploration and assets to stem an anticipated decline in manufacturing from the early 2030s.
In Norway, firms can get refunds of 71.8% of losses related to exploration. The taxes in Norway are excessive, however they’ve been this fashion because the Nineties, offering long-term certainty to operators.
That is so in contrast to within the UK, the place the tax regime has modified yearly since 2022 by each Conservative and Labour governments, making any funding plans so unpredictable that firms are quitting the UK North Sea.
Because the Power Earnings Levy (EPL), or the windfall tax, was initially launched by the Conservative authorities on the peak of the power disaster in 2022, oil and fuel firms working within the UK North Sea have been calling for certainty within the regulatory and tax framework. Latest adjustments in insurance policies and the rising taxes imposed by the present Labour authorities have pushed away operators, who say {that a} lack of North Sea investments would solely make the UK extra depending on oil and fuel imports.
Late final 12 months, as Labour additional raised the windfall tax, it additionally eliminated the 29% funding allowance on oil and fuel operations, additional stifling UK North Sea funding.
The consequence has been an exodus of firms, a decline in manufacturing, and a hunch in exploration drilling.
In truth, because of the fiscal turmoil lately, 2025 is ready to turn into the primary 12 months since 1960 and not using a single exploration effectively within the UK North Sea, based on power consultancy Wooden Mackenzie.
What The Future Holds
The UK’s unpredictable regulatory and tax regime has already pushed operators away from the UK North Sea.
On the finish of final 12 months, U.S. oil producer Apache stated it might stop oil manufacturing at its belongings within the UK North Sea by 2030, saying that “the anticipated returns don’t economically assist making investments required underneath the mixed affect of the laws.”
In a significant blow to the UK business, Ineos Power this summer time ended UK funding, after warning a couple of months earlier that the tax is “essentially the most unstable fiscal regime on the planet.”
The UK’s “present tax regime, its over-regulation and the destructive political perspective in direction of oil and fuel are obstacles that may deter any investor in the meanwhile,” Ineos Power chairman Brian Gilvary, a former chief monetary officer at BP, stated final December.
The UK authorities has launched consultations on what sort of tax regime ought to come subsequent and on whether or not to award licenses within the North Sea. Selections are anticipated later this autumn.
The principle offshore power industries affiliation, OEUK, urges the federal government to interchange the Power Earnings Levy with a everlasting profits-based tax system and replace licensing guidelines “to offer predictable entry to new assets, guaranteeing infrastructure is absolutely utilised slightly than decommissioned prematurely.”
The lack of funding is decreasing oil and fuel manufacturing—it has plunged by 40% prior to now 5 years and is on monitor to halve once more by 2030, OEUK warns.
Whereas the UK is in a race in opposition to time to avoid wasting its oil and fuel business and its industrial capabilities from demise, Norway is having fun with greater oil and fuel manufacturing as new fields come on-line.
However Western Europe’s largest oil and fuel producer, Norway, is just not complacent. It’s conscious that it wants extra exploration and new area developments to maintain output at excessive ranges whereas the world nonetheless wants it.
The present and previous Norwegian governments have repeatedly guess on the oil and fuel business and the huge revenues it raises for the nation and its sovereign wealth fund, the world’s largest. Authorities Pension Fund World, which is often known as ‘Norway’s oil fund’ as a result of it was created with oil and fuel revenues, has $2 trillion value of belongings and holds on common 1.5% of all listed firms on the planet.
“Norway needs to be a long-term provider of oil and fuel to Europe, whereas the Norwegian continental shelf will proceed to create worth and jobs for our nation,” Power Minister Terje Aasland stated in August, asserting the plans for a brand new licensing spherical.
“We want new discoveries to make sure that Norway can stay a secure and predictable provider of oil and fuel to Europe,” Aasland stated earlier this 12 months.
By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com
Extra Prime Reads From Oilprice.com:
Oilprice Intelligence brings you the indicators earlier than they turn into front-page information. This is identical professional evaluation learn by veteran merchants and political advisors. Get it free, twice every week, and you will all the time know why the market is transferring earlier than everybody else.
You get the geopolitical intelligence, the hidden stock knowledge, and the market whispers that transfer billions – and we’ll ship you $389 in premium power intelligence, on us, only for subscribing. Be part of 400,000+ readers at this time. Get entry instantly by clicking right here.
![[OPINION] Open the ICI hearings to the general public, institute a whistleblower program](https://www.rappler.com/tachyon/2025/10/TL-OPEN-ICI-HEARINGS-OCT-16-2025.jpg "[OPINION] Open the ICI hearings to the general public, institute a whistleblower program")
