Shaking the inventory market from deep slumber 

Securities and Trade Fee (SEC) Chairman Francis Lim’s current assertion on the tiered public-float proposal serves as a agency reminder that the round stays a residing draft, not a predetermined end result. By stressing that “nobody ought to count on to have their means” and nothing is remaining, Lim positions the SEC as an establishment dedicated to open session somewhat than regulatory seize. His message is aimed equally at massive issuers lobbying for decrease floats and investor teams urgent for stricter thresholds: the reform will transfer solely on the power of knowledge, liquidity concerns, and long-term market affect, not on stress campaigns or political noise.

By asserting that the SEC “will resolve solely on what is true for the market, not on who shouts the loudest,” Lim is signaling a recalibration of regulatory self-discipline at a important second for Philippine capital markets. The comment reinforces the company’s independence and asserts that the ultimate framework will steadiness competing pursuits with a watch towards credibility, liquidity depth, and investor safety. In a market hungry for each modernization and belief, this posture of principled neutrality could show as necessary because the float reform itself.

The arrival of Lim on the helm of SEC has injected an uncommon burst of power right into a capital market lengthy accustomed to incrementalism. 

Lim, a seasoned capital-markets lawyer and former Philippine Inventory Trade (PSE) president, has wasted little time diagnosing the nation’s structural deficiencies: too few listed firms, chronically shallow liquidity, and a regulatory structure that has not saved tempo with neither the size of contemporary issuers nor the calls for of worldwide buyers. 

Within the Group for Financial Cooperation and Improvement (OECD) cross-country comparisons, the Philippines persistently posts one of many lowest market-capitalization-to-GDP ratios amongst members of the Affiliation of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and an anemic pipeline of recent listings. For years, regulators lamented these indicators however delivered solely modest reforms. Lim, to his credit score, is making an attempt a extra complete reset. The OECD is a worldwide coverage establishment made up of 38 member nations, principally high-income economies, that work collectively to form financial, social, monetary, and regulatory requirements. (READ: Worth entice: Why the PSE is one among world’s worst-performing markets)

Essentially the most controversial — and doubtlessly transformative — piece of that reset is the SEC’s newly launched publicity draft introducing a tiered minimal public-float framework for preliminary public choices (IPO). It replaces the long-standing flat 20% rule with a size-sensitive ladder: 33% float for firms valued at P500 million or under; 25% for these as much as P1 billion; 20% for these with mid-capitalization as much as P50 billion; 15% for giant issuers between P50 billion and P150 billion; and a sharply decrease 12% for mega-capitalized ones above P150 billion, supplied they nonetheless adjust to minimal peso-value thresholds.

Applause, considerations

Unsurprisingly, this triggered applause from some corners of the market and discomfort from others. Massive issuers, significantly monetary know-how firms (fintechs) and conglomerate carve-outs considering blockbuster listings, see eventually a regulatory regime that understands the absorptive limits of a shallow market. 

However governance advocates fear {that a} 12% float is dangerously skinny, doubtlessly entrenching already highly effective controlling households, whereas conferring on them the reputational advantages of public standing. 

As with most issues in market microstructure, the reality lies within the interaction of incentives, liquidity dynamics, and regulatory self-discipline.

To grasp the logic of the reform, one should start with the essential arithmetic of an IPO. Beneath the outdated flat 20% rule, a ₱300-billion firm considering an inventory would have been compelled to unload ₱60 billion price of shares. In a market the place annual whole turnover typically hovers at ranges smaller than that single issuance, such provide would overwhelm each home establishments and overseas funds. The coverage, well-intentioned because it was, all however assured that enormous, fast-growing firms would keep personal, listing overseas, or keep away from the general public markets solely. The tiered framework is an express try and take away this structural bottleneck.

In contrast, a small- or mid-sized issuer presents a wholly completely different downside. Skinny public floats within the micro-cap and small-cap phase are infamous breeding grounds for cornering, insider-driven spikes, and worth manipulation. Requiring the next float — 33% for the smallest, 25% for the following tier — improves worth discovery, broadens investor participation, and protects retail consumers who depend on clear, aggressive order books somewhat than insider networks. These firms are likely to have restricted analyst protection, small free floats, and infrequently unstable buying and selling profiles. 

Extra public float on this house — not much less — is exactly the corrective the market wants.

Regulatory transfer

Considered by way of this lens, the tiering system is just not a deregulation of floats; it’s a reallocation of regulatory strictness. 

The SEC is tightening the float requirement the place governance and liquidity dangers are highest and loosening it the place the 20% threshold was virtually stopping listings altogether. In pure coverage design phrases, it is among the extra rational calibrations that the market has seen in a decade.

However the reform’s potential have to be weighed in opposition to its dangers. 

A 12% float for mega-caps raises official considerations about market integrity. In markets the place shareholder activism is weak and related-party transactions stay a systemic governance problem, permitting controlling shareholders to retain 88% of fairness, whereas tapping public capital, magnifies the danger of minority squeeze-out, valuation opacity, and governance complacency. 

If the peso-value ground is just not rigorously enforced, a mega-cap may listing with simply sufficient public shares to fulfill the letter of the rule, whereas ravenous the market of real liquidity. Worse, if such firms are admitted to the principle index, passive funds with mechanical allocation guidelines can be compelled to purchase right into a tightly held title with restricted free float, magnifying worth distortion in each instructions.

Strengthening guardrails

For that reason, the float rule can’t be evaluated in isolation. It lives or dies primarily based on the SEC’s skill to strengthen the encircling regulatory guardrails: audit enforcement, related-party scrutiny, valuation requirements, and disclosure self-discipline. 

That is the place Lim’s broader reform agenda turns into related. 

The SEC beneath his management has begun clearing inner backlogs, simplifying procedural necessities, redesigning registration and IPO workflows, and pushing the implementation of the Capital Markets Effectivity Promotion Act (CMEPA). The fee can also be refining the principles governing REITs, syncing reinvestment timelines with market realities and widening the definition of income-generating property. On the non-bank monetary facet, consumer-protection reforms purpose to curb abusive assortment practices and strengthen disclosure obligations.

In different phrases, the tiered float is arriving inside a bigger regulatory modernization plan, not as a standalone experiment. If the SEC follows by way of, this creates a scaffolding strong sufficient to help a extra versatile float regime.

The remaining query is whether or not such a regime is favorable to the market as a complete. On this, a forensic studying of liquidity mechanics, investor conduct, and historic precedent factors to a cautiously affirmative reply.

• First, the Philippine market desperately wants a deeper bench of large-cap names. The PSE Index is dominated by a small cluster of conglomerates whose mixed buying and selling volumes have been declining. New sectors — digital finance, logistics, knowledge infrastructure — are underrepresented. 

When markets lack sector variety, overseas buyers deal with them as tactical short-term trades somewhat than strategic long-term allocations. A extra versatile float construction is a prerequisite for bringing within the form of mega-cap issuers that alter index composition, appeal to international funds, and produce spillover liquidity throughout the board.

• Second, liquidity is just not decided solely by float share; it’s pushed by absolute float worth, institutional participation, and the rate of shares. A 12% float of a P300-billion issuer continues to be P36 billion of tradable paper — bigger than your entire free float of many current index constituents. The structural threat is just not insufficiency of float, however weak spot in valuation enforcement or regulatory seize. If the SEC disciplines inflated valuations and enforces peso-value flooring tightly, liquidity considerations develop into much less materials.
• Third, for small caps, rising the float is a long-overdue correction. Too many Philippine micro-cap IPOs through the years have had float sizes so small they have been functionally managed markets, susceptible to round buying and selling and worth orchestration. Retail buyers, specifically, have clamored for higher transparency and deeper float to cushion volatility. On this phase, the SEC’s transfer is explicitly pro-investor.

A wager grounded on financial realities

The most important unknown is issuer conduct. 

Will SMEs balk on the greater float requirement and decide out of the IPO observe altogether? Probably. Some family-owned companies could want debt or personal fairness to protect management. However others — particularly these eyeing enlargement capital — could discover {that a} bigger float broadens their enchantment and stabilizes post-IPO buying and selling. Conversely, will mega-caps listing extra readily now that they’ll float 15% or 12% as a substitute of 20%?  Sure. The fee-benefit calculus shifts, significantly for issuers whose scale would have required unloading tens of billions of pesos beneath the outdated rule.

Finally, the tiered float framework is just not a assure of market revival. It’s merely the removing of one of many structural boundaries that saved the market stagnant. Its success will hinge on execution: whether or not the SEC enforces the brand new guidelines with out exception, whether or not it cracks down on valuation abuses just like the current audit and appraisal controversies, and whether or not the trade revisits index inclusion guidelines to keep away from overweighting tightly managed firms.

Francis Lim has positioned a strategic wager: that market enlargement, not inflexible governance orthodoxy, is what the Philippine capital market wants most at this second. It’s a wager grounded within the financial realities of a shallow market that should compete regionally for listings, liquidity, and investor consideration. However it isn’t with out threat. A float that’s too low can breed opacity; a float that’s too excessive for mega-caps can kill offers. The brand new framework makes an attempt to stroll that tightrope.

The true take a look at will come not within the rule’s publication, however within the offers it allows — or fails to allow — over the following 24 months. If main issuers lastly listing, if liquidity deepens, and if governance enforcement retains tempo, the reform can be remembered because the turning level. If not, it would be part of the lengthy listing of well-meaning regulatory changes that failed to maneuver the needle.

For now, the decision is neither triumph nor cautionary story. It’s a uncommon second of regulatory ambition in a market that sorely wants it. The revival of Philippine capital markets would require greater than a brand new float regime. However with out it, revival wouldn’t come in any respect. – Rappler.com

Click on right here for extra Vantage Level articles