By JOEY CAPPELLETTI, Related Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan is refusing to voluntarily adjust to a Justice Division investigation right into a video she organized urging U.S. navy members to withstand “unlawful orders” — escalating a dispute that President Donald Trump has publicly pushed.
In letters first obtained by The Related Press, Slotkin’s lawyer knowledgeable U.S. Lawyer for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro that the senator wouldn’t conform to a voluntary interview concerning the video. Slotkin’s authorized staff additionally requested that Pirro protect all paperwork associated to the matter for “anticipated litigation.”
Slotkin’s lawyer individually wrote to Lawyer Basic Pam Bondi, declining to sit down for an FBI interview concerning the video and urging her to right away terminate any inquiry.
The refusal marks a possible turning level within the standoff, shifting the burden onto the Justice Division to determine whether or not it would escalate an investigation into sitting members of Congress or retreat from an inquiry now being brazenly challenged.
“I did this to go on offense,” Slotkin stated in an interview Wednesday. “And to place them able the place they’re faucet dancing. To place them able the place they should personal their decisions of utilizing a U.S. legal professional’s workplace to come back after a senator.”
‘It’s not gonna cease except I battle again’
Final November, Slotkin joined 5 different Democratic lawmakers — all of whom beforehand served within the navy or at intelligence businesses — in posting a 90-second video urging U.S. service members to comply with established navy protocols and reject orders they consider to be illegal.
The lawmakers stated Trump’s Republican administration was “pitting our uniformed navy and intelligence neighborhood professionals in opposition to Americans” and referred to as on troops to “arise for our legal guidelines.”
The video sparked a firestorm in Republican circles and shortly drew the eye of Trump, who accused the lawmakers of sedition and stated their actions had been “punishable by demise.”
The Pentagon later introduced it had opened an investigation into Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, a former Navy pilot who appeared within the video. The FBI then contacted the lawmakers searching for interviews, signaling a broader Justice Division inquiry.
Slotkin stated a number of authorized advisers initially urged warning.
“Possibly if you happen to hold quiet, this can all go away over Christmas,” Slotkin stated she was informed.
However in January, the matter flared once more, with the lawmakers saying they had been contacted by the U.S. legal professional’s workplace for the District of Columbia.
In the meantime, safety threats mounted. Slotkin stated her farm in Michigan acquired a bomb risk, her brother was assigned a police element as a result of threats and her mother and father had been swatted in the course of the evening.
Her father, who died in January after an extended battle with most cancers, “might barely stroll and he’s coping with the cops in his house,” she stated.
Slotkin stated a “change went off” in her and he or she grew to become offended: “And I stated, ‘It’s not gonna cease except I battle again.’”
Democratic senators draw a line
The requests from the FBI and the Justice Division have been voluntary. Slotkin stated that her authorized staff had communicated with prosecutors however that officers “hold asking for a private interview.”
Slotkin’s lawyer, Preet Bharara, within the letter to Pirro declined the interview request and requested that she “instantly terminate any open investigation and stop any additional inquiry regarding the video.” Within the different letter, Bharara urged Bondi to make use of her authority to direct Pirro to shut the inquiry.
Bharara wrote that Slotkin’s constitutional rights had been infringed and stated litigation is being thought-about.
“All choices are most undoubtedly on the desk,” Slotkin stated. Requested whether or not she would adjust to a subpoena, she paused earlier than responding: “I’d take a tough take a look at it.”
Kelly has equally pushed again, suing the Pentagon final month over makes an attempt to punish him for the video. On Tuesday, a federal decide stated that he is aware of of no U.S. Supreme Courtroom precedent to justify the Pentagon’s censuring of Kelly as he weighed whether or not to intervene.
Slotkin stated she’s involved with the opposite lawmakers who appeared within the video, however she wouldn’t say what their plans had been within the investigations.
A rising profile
Trump has incessantly and persistently focused his political opponents. In some instances, these assaults have had the unintended consequence of elevating their nationwide standing.
In Kelly’s case, he raised greater than $12.5 million within the last months of 2025 following the “unlawful orders” video controversy, based on marketing campaign finance filings.
Slotkin, like Kelly, has been talked about amongst Democrats who might emerge as presidential contenders in 2028.
She beforehand represented one of many nation’s best Home districts earlier than profitable a Senate seat in Michigan in 2024, whilst Trump carried the state.
Slotkin delivered the Democratic response to Trump’s handle to Congress final yr and has since urged her celebration to confront him extra aggressively, saying Democrats had misplaced their “alpha vitality” and calling on them to “go nuclear” in opposition to Trump’s redistricting push.
“If I’m encouraging different individuals to take threat, how can I not then settle for threat myself?” Slotkin stated. “I believe you’ve acquired to point out people who we’re not going to put down and take it.”
