By MARK SHERMAN
WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Courtroom on Tuesday dominated that Individuals can’t sue the U.S. Postal Service, even when workers intentionally refuse to ship mail.
By a 5-4 vote, the justices dominated towards a Texas landlord, Lebene Konan, who alleges her mail was deliberately withheld for 2 years. Konan, who’s Black, claims racial prejudice performed a job in postal workers’ actions.
Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for a majority of 5 conservative justices, stated the federal legislation that typically shields the Postal Service from lawsuits over lacking, misplaced and undelivered mail consists of “the intentional nondelivery of mail.”
In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that whereas the safety towards lawsuits is broad, it doesn’t prolong to conditions when the choice to not ship mail “was pushed by malicious causes.” Justice Neil Gorsuch joined his three liberal colleagues in dissent.
President Donald Trump’s Republican administration had warned {that a} ruling for Konan would have led to a flood of comparable lawsuits towards the cash-strapped Postal Service.
Konan, who’s additionally an actual property agent and an insurance coverage agent, claims two workers at a publish workplace in Euless, Texas, a part of the Dallas-Fort Price metroplex, intentionally didn’t ship mail belonging to her and her tenants as a result of, she alleges, they didn’t like that she is Black and owns a number of properties.
In keeping with court docket paperwork, the dispute started when Konan found the mailbox key for one among her rental properties had been modified with out her information, stopping her from amassing and distributing tenants’ mail from the field. When she contacted the native publish workplace, she was instructed she wouldn’t obtain a brand new key or common supply till she proved she owned the property. She did so, the paperwork say, however the mail issues continued, regardless of the USPS inspector common instructing the mail to be delivered.
Konan alleges the workers marked among the mail as undeliverable or return to sender. Konan and her tenants didn’t obtain essential mail resembling payments, drugs and automotive titles, in keeping with the lawsuit. Konan additionally claims she misplaced rental earnings as a result of some tenants moved out as a result of scenario.
After submitting dozens of complaints with postal officers, Konan lastly filed a lawsuit below the 1946 Federal Tort Claims Act, which permits some lawsuits towards the federal government. The case centered on the attain of the particular postal exemption to the legislation.
Observe the AP’s protection of the U.S. Supreme Courtroom at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
