Taylor Swift attends the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 02, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.
Frazer Harrison | Getty Photos Leisure | Getty Photos
A model of this text appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth e-newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly information to the high-net-worth investor and client. Join to obtain future editions, straight to your inbox.
A brand new push by states to tax the true property of the rich has sparked a backlash amongst brokers and potential consumers, who say the taxes punish a very powerful native spenders.
From tax hikes on expensive second houses in Rhode Island and Montana to Cape Cod’s proposed switch tax on houses over $2 million and the L.A. mansion tax, state and native governments see a income gold mine within the expensive properties of the rich.
“It is a smack within the face to individuals who simply spend cash right here,” stated Donna Krueger-Simmons, gross sales agent with Mott & Chace Sotheby’s Worldwide in Watch Hill, Rhode Island.
The tax hikes are being pushed by tighter state budgets and populist anger over housing prices. States wish to offset price range cuts anticipated from the brand new tax and spending invoice in Washington. On the similar time, the housing market has change into a story of two consumers, with the center class and youthful households struggling to afford houses whereas the luxurious housing market thrives from rich all-cash consumers.
The answer for a lot of states: tax the houses of the wealthy.
Rhode Island’s new levy, nicknamed “The Taylor Swift Tax,” is among the many most excessive. The popstar purchased a seaside home within the state’s elite Watch Hill neighborhood in 2013.
The measure imposes a brand new surcharge on second houses valued at greater than $1 million. For non-primary residences, or these not occupied for greater than 182 days a yr, the state will cost $2.50 for each $500 in assessed worth above the primary $1 million. That cost is on prime of current property taxes and can add as much as large will increase for luxurious houses in Newport, Watch Hill and different well-heeled, summer season communities within the state.
Swift’s home, for example, is assessed at round $28 million, in keeping with native actual property information. Her present property taxes are estimated at round $201,000 a yr. The brand new costs will add one other $136,442 to her annual taxes, bringing her yearly complete to $337,442 – though locals say she not often visits.
Actual property brokers say the rise targets the very taxpayers who already contribute essentially the most. Rich second-homeowners pay hefty property taxes however do not use many native providers, since their major residences are in New York; Boston; Palm Seashore, Florida; or different locales. Their youngsters usually do not attend the native faculties, they usually’re rare customers of the police, hearth, water and different municipal providers since most keep for less than 10 to 12 weeks out of the yr.
“These are individuals who simply come right here for the summer season, spend their cash and pay their fair proportion of taxes,” stated Krueger-Simmons. “They’re getting penalized simply because in addition they stay some other place.”
Brokers and longtime residents say the summer season residents of Newport, Watch Hill and different seasonal seaside cities are the financial engines for native companies, eating places and inns.
“You are simply hurting the individuals who help small enterprise,” stated Lori Joyal, of the Lila Delman Compass workplace in Watch Hill. “You are chasing away the individuals who spend many of the cash in these cities.”
Rhode Island can be mountain climbing its conveyance tax on luxurious actual property beginning in October. The tax on actual property gross sales might be an extra $3.75 for every $500 paid above $800,000 for an actual property buy. On the similar time, the state’s steep property tax deters lots of the ultra-wealthy from dwelling there full-time.
Brokers say some second-home house owners are contemplating promoting and lots of would-be consumers are pausing their purchases. Whereas the tax hike alone is not anticipated to result in any important wealth flight, Joyal stated potential consumers in Rhode Island are already coastal cities in Connecticut as alternate options.
“It is at all times about selections,” she stated. “On the finish of the day it is about how they’ll select to spend their discretionary {dollars}. Connecticut has some stunning coastal cities with out a few of these different excessive taxes.”
FILE – On this Might 27, 2013, file picture, individuals stroll previous a home owned by Taylor Swift within the village of Watch Hill in Westerly, R.I.
Dave Collins | AP
Montana has handed the same tax. The inflow of Californians and different prosperous newcomers who poured into the state throughout Covid has led to hovering residence costs and rising resentment over gentrification. In the meantime, the state’s low revenue tax price and lack of a gross sales tax has left it little room for income will increase to deal with the required improve in providers.
In Might, the state handed a two-tier property tax plan, reducing charges for full-time residents and elevating taxes on second houses and short-term leases. For major residences and long-term leases valued at or under the state’s median residence value, the tax price might be 0.76%. Properties value greater than that can face a tiered-rate system of as much as 1.9% on any worth over 4 instances the median value.
The Montana Division of Income expects the modifications, which can begin subsequent yr, will hike second-home taxes by a median of 68%. Brokers say some consumers are ready to see the tax payments subsequent yr earlier than making any selections about whether or not to purchase or promote.
“I’ve heard about some consumers who’ve placed on the brakes to attend for the mud to settle and see what occurs,” stated Valerie Johnson, with PureWest Christie’s Worldwide Actual Property in Bozeman, Montana.
Johnson stated that whereas the tax was touted by legislators as hitting rich second-home house owners, it should additionally hit longtime locals who personal funding houses and lease them out for revenue.
“These are small companies for many individuals,” she stated.
Manish Bhatt, a senior coverage analyst on the Tax Basis, stated tax hikes geared toward rich second-home house owners could also be standard politically, however they not often make for profitable or environment friendly tax coverage. Actual property tax reform ought to be broad primarily based, fairly than targeted on taxpayers who’re singled out simply because they do not stay in a neighborhood full-time, he stated.
“There’s a seize to search out income proper now,” he stated. “However taxing second-home house owners may have the other influence – dissuading individuals from proudly owning a second residence or proceed to personal in these communities.”
Whereas the brand new taxes alone won’t drive out the rich, “we do know that taxes are necessary to companies and people and will trigger individuals to decide to purchase in one other close by state,” Bhatt stated.
The projected income from the brand new taxes may disappoint. When Los Angeles handed its so-called “mansion tax” in 2022, proponents touted income projections of between $600 million to $1.1 billion a yr. The tax, imposed on actual property gross sales over $5 million, has solely raised $785 million after greater than two years, in keeping with the Los Angeles Housing Division.
Larger rates of interest that harm the housing market have performed a task, specialists say. But Michael Manville, professor of city planning on the UCLA Luskin Faculty of Public Affairs, stated rich consumers and sellers additionally decreased transactions in response to the tax.
“The decrease income is a cause to be involved as a result of it means that the tax may truly be lowering transactions, which in flip can cut back housing manufacturing and property tax income,” he stated.