NPR’s Leila Fadel asks veteran diplomat Richard Haass about President Trump’s targets together with his deal with to the World Financial Discussion board in Switzerland.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
OK, we’ll dig additional into President Trump’s rambling speech at Davos as we speak. As we heard, it went on for greater than an hour as he veered from portray a very rosy image of the U.S. financial system that does not appear to match actuality to calling European allies ungrateful, to creating racist remarks about Somalis being low-IQ individuals and pirates. To unpack Trump’s remarks that lasted all this time and what this speech means for the U.S.-led world order, Richard Haass joins me now. He was a distinguished American diplomat and the president emeritus of the Council on International Relations. Good morning, and welcome again to this system.
RICHARD HAASS: Good morning, and good to be again.
FADEL: So I wish to begin with what U.S. allies in Europe had been listening for, Trump’s place on Greenland and whether or not it is comfortable. And as we heard from our correspondent, Trump did say he would not use pressure, however he demanded rapid negotiations with Denmark for the U.S. to amass Greenland. Let’s hear somewhat little bit of what else he stated.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: So we would like a bit of ice for world safety, they usually will not give it. We have by no means requested for anything, and we might have saved that piece of land, and we did not. So that they have a selection. You possibly can say sure, and we will probably be very appreciative, or you possibly can say no, and we are going to keep in mind.
FADEL: I imply, how will this message land with European allies, with Denmark and with Greenland?
HAASS: Let me provide you with two solutions. When it comes to Greenland, individuals will probably be relieved over the ruling out of army pressure. They’re going to be uneasy ‘trigger it is nonetheless not clear what america requires and whether or not Trump is ready to just accept one thing wanting what he calls possession. And if he would not get it, what can be his retaliation? What can be the results for Ukraine or for Europe? In order that’s one set of questions.
So possibly there is a shallow sigh of reduction, however not a deep one. And the opposite response is solely one in all – in some methods, it goes again to the Canadian prime minister’s speak yesterday of actual unease. They see this American president. They hear him, his views his disparaging views of NATO, of particular person European leaders, his tackle historical past. I’d assume the common European says, that is an untenable scenario. We not have a United States we are able to belief or companion with. We want to consider the subsequent period of historical past ‘trigger the earlier one has come to an in depth.
FADEL: So you do not see anyone being reassured about U.S. management, given this speech?
HAASS: On the contrary. There is a narrowness about U.S. international coverage when it comes to business acquire. There’s – we have moved from working by way of consent to coercion. We see our allies not as companions, however, in lots of circumstances, as quasi-adversaries wanted to be pushed. You recognize, should you keep in mind, additionally, the nationwide safety technique, the best way Europe was handled, virtually a contempt for European tradition. You heard a few of that as we speak, the insulting feedback about a number of leaders. So no, this was not a – this is not going to be taken by anybody in Europe as a pleasant deal with.
FADEL: And as you identified, as our correspondent identified, the prime minister of Canada, Mark Carney, received plenty of consideration yesterday for principally saying the outdated U.S.-led world order was a pleasing fiction that not serves its allies, and center powers like Canada must get – to unite towards this bullying, nice energy, bullying nice energy. He known as this second a rupture and never a transition. After which we heard Trump instantly reply with what appeared like a menace. And we heard it earlier, however I am simply going to cite him right here once more. Canada lives due to america. Do not forget that, Mark, the subsequent time you make your statements. What did you make of that?
HAASS: That was crude. I do not know every other phrase for it. It was crude. It was heavy-handed. That sounded extra like a mob boss than just like the president of america. It was a veiled warning. Nothing was specific. And I do not know what it would imply when it comes to tariffs or different pressures. However that was – once more, that’s not the language you employ to a neighbor and an ally. Keep in mind, one of many nice structural benefits of america is we have now this companion on our northern border. We do not have to place troops up towards Canada. We will calm down. Most different international locations have to fret about harmful neighbors. We do not. And the president appears to be going out of his solution to alter this relationship for the more severe.
FADEL: Just a few instances, we heard Trump say a model of this.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
TRUMP: The USA is the financial engine on the planet. And when America booms, your complete world booms. It has been the historical past.
FADEL: And he principally was saying, gee, you simply must comply with what the U.S. is doing. If we do nice, you may do nice. Do what we are saying. And he was chatting with European allies who had made it clear they had been on edge over whether or not this alliance was now turning into an adversarial relationship over NATO, over Greenland. Will they stroll away reassured in any respect?
HAASS: Look, on the financial, the president have a degree. Properly, when the U.S. does properly, the remainder of the world advantages. After we sneeze, the remainder of the world catches a chilly. So I believe that is a truth of life, however they are not going to be reassured. Give it some thought. The assaults on the independence of the Federal Reserve Board, america is operating near a $39 trillion deficit, questions on American steadiness and reliability. So the truth that america is so essential to their financial and strategic futures, but this isn’t a United States they acknowledge anymore. So no, they do not come away reassured. Although they do nonetheless admire, I believe it is truthful to level out, the fact in our potential for financial innovation and development.
FADEL: If the outdated order is useless, what’s the new order, in your view, and the place does that go away america?
HAASS: Properly, that is the stuff of historical past. And that is – you recognize, it should be messier. It’ll be in all probability extra battle, much less affluent, much less free, much less American affect. However the particulars are to be decided. And that is why, you recognize, historical past by no means ends. You could have pauses. You could have transitions. And my sense is we’re approaching a transition. However I nonetheless assume to be decided is what is the character, each of the place we get to and the way we get there. And that is nonetheless a giant concern for this administration and, conceivably, for the subsequent one.
FADEL: And as you listened as we speak to this speech, what was your one massive takeaway from as we speak and what that may imply for the long run?
HAASS: How little this administration and this president respect what they inherited and the way little they worth the final eight a long time. And so they appear so keen to frivolously, virtually recklessly, throw it away for one thing that is unknown and virtually sure to be far worse. And it is the sense of recklessness and virtually irresponsibility. They’re stewards and custodians of the welfare of this nation. And I come away uneasy after which some – that is a diplomatic understatement – with how they’re treating the inheritance and the way sanguine they appear to be that we are able to transfer to one thing completely different that they’re persuaded will probably be higher.
FADEL: Veteran diplomat Richard Haass is president emeritus of the Council on International Relations. Thanks on your time.
HAASS: Thanks.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
Copyright © 2026 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might fluctuate. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its authentic broadcast or publication. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.
