Washington — Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones requested the Supreme Court docket on Thursday to halt a virtually $1.5 billion judgment for making false claims that the 2012 taking pictures at Sandy Hook Elementary College was a hoax.
Jones, the host of the present InfoWars, is asking the excessive court docket to freeze enforcement of the record-breaking sum that he was ordered to pay after he was discovered liable in 2021 for damages in lawsuits introduced by the households of kids who had been killed within the bloodbath.
A six-person jury had determined that Jones ought to pay $965 million to the households as compensation for defamation, inflection of emotional misery and violations of a Connecticut regulation, and a state court docket decide added on one other $474 million in punitive damages.
Jones had repeatedly claimed that the 2012 taking pictures that killed 20 college students and 6 lecturers was staged by “disaster actors” as a part of a plan to enact extra restrictive gun legal guidelines. Kinfolk of the victims and an FBI agent testified throughout the defamation trial that they had been threatened and harassed by Jones’ listeners who believed his lies in regards to the bloodbath.
In a special lawsuit introduced in Texas, Jones testified that the taking pictures was “100% actual.” Nonetheless, he had slammed the Connecticut trial as a “kangaroo court docket” and argued it violated his free speech rights.
Jones and Free Speech Techniques, his firm, filed for chapter safety after he was ordered to pay the households, and the satirical publication The Onion tried to buy InfoWars at a chapter public sale for an undisclosed value final 12 months. However a chapter decide rejected the sale of InfoWars to The Onion final December. Jones’ attorneys mentioned there’s nonetheless an effort underway for InfoWars to be bought.
In his request for emergency reduction from the Supreme Court docket, Jones’ attorneys mentioned he shouldn’t must pay the $1.5 billion whereas the justices think about whether or not to take up his enchantment of the sanction.
He argued that the plaintiffs who sued him for defamation had been public figures, and mentioned the lies underpinning the judgment had been primarily based on his protection of the taking pictures, which he mentioned was of public concern.
Jones claimed that absent emergency reduction, InfoWars “can have been acquired by its ideological nemesis and destroyed — which Jones believes is the Plaintiffs’ intention,” and its listeners will likely be disadvantaged of a “valued supply of data.”
