Paramount letter questions Warner Bros. Discovery sale course of

Expensive Mr. Zaslav: We write on behalf of Paramount Skydance Company (“Paramount”, “we” or “us”) to precise our critical issues concerning the equity and adequacy of the bidding course of for a possible mixture with Warner Bros. Discovery (“WBD” or “you”). It has grow to be more and more clear, by means of media reporting and in any other case, that WBD seems to have deserted the illusion and actuality of a good transaction course of, thereby abdicating its duties to stockholders, and launched into a myopic course of with a predetermined final result that favors a single bidder. We particularly request and count on this letter can be shared and mentioned with the complete board of administrators of WBD.

We’ve got just lately seen reporting within the U.S. and overseas media that offers critical trigger for concern. The German newspaper Handelsblatt just lately reported on a gathering that reportedly passed off in Brussels between Gerhard Zieler, President of WBD’s Worldwide Enterprise and a direct report back to WBD’s Chief Govt Officer, who “arrived with a three-person group,” with the E.U. Fee Vice President Hena Virkkunen, to debate the potential merger prospects for WBD. In that dialog, the article experiences that “issues had been raised that the Ellison household’s deliberate acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery may result in extreme media focus,” and that the E.U. Fee would contemplate intervening in a possible merger with Paramount for that reason. The article quotes “sources shut” to Zeiler as saying “that the talks with the Fee had been essential as a result of each Warner and the EU needed to protect media variety.” The implications of such a gathering, if it occurred, are clear and evince a tacit resistance to, if not energetic sabotage of, a Paramount supply.

Whereas this report is regarding in itself, this isn’t an remoted report concerning purported WBD resistance to a mix with Paramount. A number of U.S. media shops have reported on the keenness by WBD administration for a transaction with Netflix, and on statements by administration {that a} transaction between WBD and Netflix could be a “slam dunk,” whereas additionally referring to Paramount’s bid in a adverse gentle. Extra reporting for the reason that submission of revised bids on December 1 has indicated that WBD’s “board has actually warmed to” a transaction with Netflix because of the “chemistry between” WBD administration and Netflix administration. We’ve got come to you first to inquire whether or not this reporting is correct, and to interact in a productive dialogue with you round any precise or perceived points that it could replicate.

Furthermore, these media experiences echo related indications that we’ve got been listening to all through this course of, regardless of what we seen as in any other case productive conversations that we’ve got had with WBD management. Paramount has a reputable foundation to imagine that the gross sales course of has been tainted by administration conflicts, together with sure members of administration’s potential private pursuits in post-transaction roles and compensation because of the financial incentives embedded in current amendments to employment preparations. These issues are amplified by indications of director bias and beholdenness to others whose pursuits might not align with the stockholders’, and the truth that alternate options involving solely sure WBD property are being prioritized however their heightened regulatory danger and potential to deprive stockholders of consideration for the whole lot of WBD’s enterprise worth.

Additional, as you understand, Paramount agreed to sure standstill preparations in trade for the chance to take part in a really aggressive and unbiased bidding course of. Paramount didn’t cut price for WBD to foster, whether or not deliberately or unintentionally, a tilted and unfair course of. We imagine that each one events to this course of ought to have a shared want for, and can mutually profit from, an unimpeachable transaction course of. As we assume you agree, even discounting the accuracy of any media experiences, simply the looks of a flawed course of imperils any potential transaction that may outcome and should undermine the potential worth maximization to WBD stockholders from any potential transaction.

In gentle of our grave issues concerning the integrity of WBD’s course of, we search affirmation as as to whether WBD has appointed an unbiased particular committee of disinterested members of its board to contemplate the potential transaction alternatives and to make a last dedication concerning a sale or break-up of all or a part of the corporate. If not, we strongly urge you to empower such a particular committee comprised of administrators with no potential look of bias or beholdenness to others whose pursuits might differ from these of the stockholders. This may appear to be an essential step at this stage, to make sure the equity and unimpeachability of the transaction course of and to maximise the worth of no matter final result WBD determines to pursue. Participating with WBD all through this course of, we’ve got been inspired by the big potential from a mix of our entities. We stay assured that the Paramount supply would offer the utmost worth to WBD stockholders and sit up for the chance to proceed to interact with you productively on this course of. However at this level we should insist on assurances and steps taken to make sure that a really truthful and unbiased course of is being performed, each for Paramount’s profit and within the curiosity of WBD’s stockholders.