Again within the 2010s, an internet site known as Let Me Google That For You gained a notable quantity of recognition for serving a single function: snark.
The location permits you to generate a customized hyperlink that you could ship any individual who asks you a query. After they click on the hyperlink, it performs an animation of the method of typing a query into Google. The concept is to point out the individual asking the query how simple it will have been for them to only search for the reply themselves.
It is an insult, mainly. It is humorous and impolite.
Now, there’s nothing incorrect with a little bit rudeness in the proper context. If an overtly hostile individual is losing your time on social media by asking simply researched questions, I believe it’s best to go forward and luxuriate in a little bit passive aggression (as a deal with).
In additional private contexts, although, utilizing Let Me Google That For You states clearly that you do not respect the individual you gave the hyperlink to, and that their query is a waste of your time. If somebody out of your office or your private life is asking you a query, it is as a result of they need your particular enter, so it is higher to only give the reply—ideally with context solely you’ll be able to present—than it’s to ship a hyperlink to a Google search outcomes web page.
Now, this being 2025, the individuals behind Let Me Google That For You additionally provide Let Me ChatGPT That For You, which works precisely the way in which you assume it does. And its existence factors to one thing new: how impolite it’s to, in response to a query, reply with AI output—particularly in a extra skilled context.
Losing Time
Telling somebody to Google one thing could be humorous and satisfying, but it surely’s not useful. I might put copy-pasting or screenshotting a dialog with ChatGPT, Claude, or every other AI agent in the identical class: not useful and form of impolite.
Developer Alex Martsinovich touched on this some time in the past in a weblog submit known as it is impolite to point out AI output to individuals: “Be well mannered, and do not ship people AI textual content,” he writes. “My very own tackle AI etiquette is that AI output can solely be relayed if it is both adopted as your personal or there may be express consent from the receiving celebration.” I believe it is a fairly good framework for AI etiquette.
If somebody asks you a query, after they may have requested the machine as an alternative, it is as a result of they needed your perspective. The web exists, not less than in idea, in order that people can join with one another, and in order that we will profit from one another’s data. Responding to a query with AI output ignores this dynamic, particularly in the event you do not say that is what you are doing.
