[ad_1]
The complaints share quite a few arguments, from Duterte’s alleged mishandling of confidential funds, to her obvious threats to the lifetime of President Marcos and his household
The three impeachment complaints filed towards Vice President Sara Duterte could also be totally different in type, however they echo one another’s arguments on why she deserves to be faraway from public workplace.
Rappler enumerates the important thing arguments within the three following petitions:
- The criticism of leftist leaders: Filed by France Castro et. al., endorsed by ACT Academics Consultant Antonio Tinio, Gabriela Consultant Sarah Elago, and Kabataan Consultant Renee Co
- The criticism of civil society leaders: Filed by Kiko Aquino Dee et. al., endorsed by ML Consultant Leila de Lima and Akbayan Consultant Chel Diokno
- The criticism of spiritual leaders: Filed by Reverend Father Joel Saballa et. al., endorsed by ML Consultant De Lima
Alleged misuse of confidential funds as Division of Schooling secretary and as Vice President
Cited in: First, second, and third impeachment complaints
Duterte is dealing with allegations that she misused P612.5 million in confidential funds inside her first 18 months in workplace — P500 million for the Workplace of the Vice President (OVP), and P112.5 million for the Division of Schooling (DepEd).
The P500 million for the OVP contains P125 million that was exhausted inside 11 days in December 2022. The Fee on Audit (COA) later disallowed P73 million from that spending.
All complaints cited the Home testimony of OVP particular disbursing officer Gina Acosta and DepEd Particular Disbursing Officer (SDO) Edward Fajarda, who stated that upon the Vice President’s directions, they turned over the confidential funds to her safety officers.
The refiled complaints additionally now point out Ramil Madriaga, a former aide of the Vice President who claimed in his sworn affidavit that upon her directions, he had labored with Duterte’s safety officers (significantly colonels Dennis Nolasco and Raymund Dante Lachica) in transporting massive sums of cash to a number of individuals.
Alleged fabrication of submissions to COA
Cited in: First, second, and third impeachment complaints
Respondents flagged the supposed false attestations within the certifications she signed to liquidate her confidential bills earlier than the COA.
These embody the 1000’s of acknowledgment receipts that supposedly bore fabricated names, such because the notorious “Mary Grace Piattos.”
The second criticism identified that out of 1,992 names of recipients of confidential funds, a minimum of 1,322 didn’t have beginning data with the Philippine Statistics Authority.
The third criticism believes Duterte needed to fabricate proof after COA flagged in September 2023 the primary studies submitted by the OVP for lack of acknowledgment receipts.
“The reality is sort of simple. VP Sara didn’t perform reliable actions with the confidential funds. She misappropriated them for herself. Thus, the OVP couldn’t submit (acknowledgment receipts) when it liquidated the confidential funds for the primary time,” the third criticism additionally learn.
Alleged bribery of DepEd officers
Cited in: Second, third impeachment complaints
Duterte is being accused of bribing DepEd subordinates throughout her time as schooling secretary.
This allegation relies on the Home testimonies of:
- former schooling undersecretary Gloria Mercado, who stated she acquired 9 envelopes containing P50,000 every from then-DepEd assistant secretary Sunshine Fajarda, in a perceived try and affect her determination as procurement head;
- former DepEd director Resty Osias, who stated he acquired a complete of 4 envelopes every containing money between P12,000 and P15,000;
- and DepEd chief accountant Ma. Rhunna Catalan, who stated she acquired a complete of 9 envelopes containing P25,000 every.
Obvious refusal to acknowledge Home’s authority throughout price range deliberations
Cited in: First impeachment criticism
The primary criticism identified that Duterte refused to acknowledge congressional oversight throughout price range deliberations.
The few occasions she attended deliberations on her workplace’s proposed price range for the succeeding yr, Duterte supplied non-answers, resembling:
- “I wish to forego the chance to defend the price range in a question-and-answer format. I’ll go away it as much as the Home to determine on the price range submitted.
- ”On the problem of confidential funds, we’ve acquired audit actions from COA relating to the confidential funds of the OVP. We have now submitted our responses, and we guarantee the general public of our full cooperation with the continuing audit.”
The primary criticism additionally took be aware of her absences throughout plenary price range deliberations with out prior discover, and even her refusal to cooperate within the inquiry of the Home good authorities committee into her alleged misuse of public funds.
The complainants stated her actions are tantamount to dereliction of official responsibility.
Alleged unexplained wealth
Cited in: Second, third impeachment complaints
The complainants flagged alleged irregularities within the financial institution transactions of Vice President Sara Duterte, primarily based on paperwork obtained by former senator Antonio Trillanes IV in 2016.
They marvel how Duterte, who had been an area official in Davao Metropolis for probably the most half between 2007 and 2022, and solely had an estimated annual earnings of P2 million, managed to considerably develop her internet price, from P13 million in 2007 to P44 million in 2017.
The complainants additionally sounded the alarm over the reported P111 billion in her checking account transactions between 2016 and 2015, which have been supposedly grossly disproportionate to her wage as a public official.
Obvious threats to the lifetime of the President and his household
Cited in: Second, third impeachment complaints
In November 2024, a distraught Duterte stated in a Zoom interview whereas locking herself contained in the Batasang Pambansa that she had employed an murderer to kill President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and then-Home speaker Martin Romualdez if one thing dangerous have been to occur to her. She additionally categorically acknowledged that she was not joking.
The assertion got here weeks after admitting she had imagined beheading the President.
The third criticism referred to as her actions a “basic instance of tyranny,” whereas the second criticism argued that her phrases are seditious and an act of terrorism.
Cited in: Second impeachment criticism
The second criticism cites the testimony by former Davao Loss of life Squad murderer and now-Worldwide Prison Court docket witness Arturo Lascañas which implicated the Vice President within the extrajudicial killings in her hometown.
Lascañas had stated that Duterte green-lit the continuation of the killings throughout her time as mayor of Davao Metropolis,
The second complainant argued that this makes Duterte accountable for the excessive crime of homicide and conspiracy to commit homicide. – Rappler.com
[ad_2]
.jpg "Ferrari’s New Jony Ive–Designed EV Is Swathed in Glass and Aluminum")
