The California Supreme Courtroom has as soon as once more rejected a lawsuit introduced by Republican legislators in search of to squash Democrats’ try and redraw the state’s congressional maps forward of subsequent yr’s midterm elections.
The courtroom denied the petition on Wednesday, Aug. 27 — simply two days after GOP members of the state legislature requested it to dam Proposition 50, a mid-decade congressional redistricting measure, from showing on the Nov. 4 poll. Republicans argued that the deliberate particular election violates the state Structure and would compromise voter illustration.
State Sens. Tony Strickland, R-Huntington Seashore, and Suzette Martinez Valladares, R-Santa Clarita, together with Assemblymembers Tri Ta, R-Westminster, and Kate Sanchez, R-Rancho Santa Margarita, have been petitioners within the lawsuit.
In a joint assertion following the courtroom’s choice, the group mentioned: “The Supreme Courtroom’s abdication of its duty to be a checks and stability on the opposite branches of the federal government, not to mention deny the chance to even hear the arguments being made, undermines voter confidence and units a terrifying precedent that the governor and a prepared legislature can blatantly disregard and violate the structure at will, with out the concern of any accountability or punishment.”
“We’re watching in actual time the destruction of law-and-order, and of our republic by the hands of a Democratic governor, Democratic super-majority legislature and Supreme Courtroom,” they added.
The group known as it a “unhappy preview” of issues to return ought to Prop. 50, which Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies are pushing, go.
The identical courtroom had rejected an identical petition that Republicans filed final week, asking a choose to intervene and halt Democrats’ try and enact new, partisan congressional maps in California for the following three elections.
On the time, the courtroom’s order mentioned the petitioners — who submitted their submitting earlier than the legislature truly voted to position Prop 50 on the poll — “failed to satisfy their burden of creating a foundation for reduction right now” below the state’s structure.
Republicans had hoped that submitting one other petition this week, after a particular election had formally been known as, would yield a unique end result.
Past the timing difficulty, Mike Columbo, an lawyer for the petitioners, mentioned this week that Prop. 50 illegally lumps two points into one measure — first by asking voters in the event that they assume California ought to petition Congress to go impartial redistricting nationwide, then asking voters to log out on the lately proposed partisan congressional maps for California.
Forcing voters to vote both “sure” or “no” on each questions concurrently violates a rule often known as the “single topic rule,” Columbo mentioned.
Newsom’s spokesperson didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark about Wednesday’s courtroom ruling.
However an X account for the governor celebrated Wednesday’s courtroom choice, saying, “Hold em coming, (CAGOP). We’ll hold profitable.”
Democrats have mentioned the partisan congressional maps they’re proposing would counter comparable gerrymandering efforts in Texas. They mentioned they’re solely going this path to “neutralize” comparable makes an attempt in crimson states to assist President Donald Trump retain GOP management of the U.S. Home of Representatives following the 2026 midterm elections.
Prop. 50 will ask voters, who’ve ultimate say, if they need the gerrymandered maps for use for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 Home races. Following the 2030 election, the state would revert to having a nonpartisan impartial fee draw future maps, as is the present follow.
However Columbo mentioned by proposing the gerrymandered maps and interesting within the redistricting course of earlier than voters truly granted lawmakers authority to take action, “the legislature exceeded its energy below the Structure.”
Columbo is with the Dhillon Regulation Group. That agency was based by Harmeet Dhillon, who leads the Justice Division’s Civil Rights Division within the Trump administration.
In the meantime, Meeting Republican Chief James Gallagher on Wednesday floated the thought — nonetheless unlikely — of splitting California into two states. His thought, a response to the redistricting efforts, is to have the Golden State’s 35 extra rural or conservative inland counties break free from its typically extra liberal coastal communities.
