Introduced by Celonis
85% of enterprises need to turn out to be agentic inside three years — but 76% admit their operations can’t assist it. In response to the Celonis 2026 Course of Optimization Report, primarily based on a survey of greater than 1,600 international enterprise leaders, organizations are aggressively pursuing AI-driven transformation. But most acknowledge that the foundational work — modernizing workflows, decreasing course of friction, and constructing operational resilience — stays unfinished. The ambition is evident. The infrastructure to execute on it’s not.
To behave autonomously and successfully, AI brokers want optimized, AI-ready processes and the method knowledge and operational context that solely comes from course of intelligence. With out that, they’re guessing. And 82% of decision-makers consider AI will fail to ship return on funding (ROI) if it doesn’t perceive how the enterprise runs.
"The size of the chance is actually outstanding: 89% of leaders see AI as their largest aggressive alternative," says Patrick Thompson, international SVP of buyer transformation. "That’s not a marginal discovering. What’s attention-grabbing is the shift within the framing. Leaders are assured that AI will remodel operations. The query now could be find out how to gasoline their ambitions with the proper AI enablers."
Explaining the hole between ambition and actuality
Proper now, 85% of groups are utilizing gen AI instruments for on a regular basis duties, so the “will this work?” query is essentially settled. The actual query has shifted to: “Why isn’t it working the way in which we want it to?” And that’s a a lot tougher drawback, as a result of it’s structural. It’s siloed groups. Programs that don’t speak to one another. AI that appears spectacular in a demo however falters as soon as it’s dropped into an actual enterprise surroundings. That’s the wall corporations are hitting.
So, regardless of the overwhelming ambition, solely 19% of organizations use multi-agent programs at the moment. All of it comes all the way down to an operational readiness drawback, Thompson says.
"9 in ten leaders are already utilizing or exploring multi-agent programs, so the desire is totally there, however ambition with out infrastructure doesn’t get you very far," he explains.
Till now, course of has largely been a “ok” drawback, as a result of processes which can be messy and disconnected can nonetheless produce outcomes, simply inefficient and opaque. So long as the enterprise is rising, there hasn’t been a burning urge to repair them. AI modified the calculus. If 82% of leaders consider AI can solely ship ROI with correct enterprise context, then sub-optimal processes aren’t simply an operational inconvenience, they’re actively blocking an AI technique. Abruptly, course of optimization isn’t a background IT venture, however a prerequisite for competing.
"That is the place structural modernization turns into essential," he says. "Organizations which have invested in modernizing their knowledge, programs, and processes are in a far stronger place to allow AI at scale."
The opposite AI stopper: Lack of enterprise context
AI won’t be able to offer the strongest ROI potential till it understands the operational context of the enterprise. That features how KPIs are outlined and calculated, any distinctive inner insurance policies and procedures, how the group is structured, and the place the true resolution authority sits.
This data is normally trapped in several departments which have developed their very own languages and programs over time. They don’t naturally share a typical understanding. Bringing AI into that surroundings is one thing like dropping somebody right into a dialog that’s been happening for years, with none of the backstory.
Course of intelligence turns into the connective layer — a shared operational language that grounds AI selections in how the enterprise really runs.
Why AI adoption can be a change administration drawback
The AI adoption problem is much less a expertise drawback and extra of a change-management and operating-model drawback than many extra leaders need to admit, as a result of expertise issues really feel simpler to unravel. The information reveals that solely 6% of leaders cite resistance to alter as a hurdle. The actual blockers are siloed groups (54%) and an absence of coordination between departments (44%). And 93% of course of and operations leaders explicitly state that course of optimization is as a lot about individuals and tradition as it’s about instruments and expertise.
"When corporations come to us searching for a expertise repair, a part of our job helps them see that the working mannequin has to evolve alongside the tooling," Thompson says. "You’ll be able to’t bolt AI onto a damaged course of and anticipate it to work. True enterprise modernization means redesigning how groups, programs, and selections join, and AI solely works when that modernization occurs first."
Making course of optimization a strategic benefit
How do you make course of optimization a strategic benefit, moderately than one other operational venture? Join it on to outcomes that executives care about. When processes work, they transcend IT metrics, immediately affecting board-level considerations. A full 63% of leaders use course of optimization to proactively handle dangers, whereas 58% see sooner decision-making.
Plus, the financial and geopolitical surroundings proper now makes agility a survival ability. Have a look at the availability chain trade, the place 66% already view course of optimization as a essential business-wide initiative.
"That’s the mindset shift we’re attempting to catalyze throughout the remainder of the group," Thompson says. "It’s not upkeep work. It’s what helps you to transfer quick when the world modifications, and proper now the world is transferring continuously."
Closing the readiness hole in enterprise agentic AI
To succeed, and even triumph, organizations have to be prepared to shut the readiness hole, and so they should be sincere about the place they're ranging from, Thompson says.
"The most important threat I see is corporations persevering with to layer AI on high of fragmented, opaque processes after which questioning why they’re not getting outcomes," he says. "Shifting from static, conventional instruments to actual course of intelligence, the place you might have reside visibility into how your operations really run, that’s the foundational shift that makes agentic AI viable."
With out it, brokers get deployed within the improper locations, can’t be built-in with present programs, and organizations find yourself with costly pilots that don’t scale. The decision to motion is evident: cease beginning with instruments and begin with operational visibility.
"The leaders who will win within the agentic period aren’t essentially those with essentially the most refined AI," he says. "They’re those who’ve carried out the arduous work of constructing a shared, correct image of their operations. Course of intelligence is the start line. It’s what allows enterprise modernization in observe, creating the operational readability AI must ship actual ROI. Grasp your processes, give AI the context it wants, after which you possibly can really deploy it someplace it can ship."
Sponsored articles are content material produced by an organization that’s both paying for the put up or has a enterprise relationship with VentureBeat, and so they’re at all times clearly marked. For extra info, contact gross sales@venturebeat.com.

